Hiisern

Hiisern — CS2 Stats

76561198017876659[U:1:57610931]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,133Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+24Tracked matches · now 1,133
0.0ppWin rate · 53.8% → 53.8%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,702 -4,468 9 Nov – 16 May · 9 days played
8,70214,694peak 14,6949 Nov16 May
14,801Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2025-11-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHiisernFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning40
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–50–7Last 10043%Win rateWWLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −47ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 8–9–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility5.9
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning4.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact6.3

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time601ms−98ms
first ⅓ avg 699ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 13 Jan →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 3–9 · inferno, 23 Aug →
445msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · dust2, 17 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 13 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC269–1735%-0.03
dust2C2310–1343%-0.03
infernoS1510–567%-0.01
nukeD123–925%-0.07
ancientA74–357%-0.02
cacheC52–340%-0.03
overpassD51–420%-0.02
cache_b—31–233%-0.03
anubis—11–0100%-0.06
eldorado—11–0100%0.02
sanctum—10–10%-0.22
alpine—11–0100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,099Matches
50%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
58.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3152%0.7010.7
Mirage2846%0.7511.1
Dust22572%0.7011.9
Ancient1942%0.6611.1
Anubis1644%0.6911.3
Nuke1233%0.8212.8
Cache683%0.9111.0
Vertigo1100%0.7911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
23.5%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
598msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
12.94HE damage / grenade
9.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.087% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.0614%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0324%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0422%19 Sept →
inferno13–30.0332%19 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0021%17 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0818%17 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0429%5 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0621%29 Aug →
dust213–10-0.058%29 Aug →
cache6–130.0420%28 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0421%28 Aug →
inferno13–100.0413%28 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0519%28 Aug →
mirage5–130.0229%28 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.056%26 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0730%26 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0418%26 Aug →
nuke13–100.0127%24 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0223%24 Aug →
dust213–20.0836%23 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0517%23 Aug →
eldorado9–70.0255%23 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1560%23 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0215%21 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0425%22 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0331%22 Jun →
inferno13–60.0150%20 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0212%16 May →
dust215–15-0.0516%16 May →
ancient10–13-0.0429%15 May →
mirage13–9-0.0612%15 May →
dust27–13-0.0542%15 May →
dust213–70.0126%15 May →
nuke5–13-0.090%15 May →
overpass13–40.0227%9 May →
mirage11–13-0.0218%9 May →
ancient13–100.0424%9 May →
nuke5–13-0.098%9 May →
mirage9–13-0.0727%9 May →
dust213–9-0.0323%9 May →
ancient6–130.0241%8 May →
mirage6–13-0.0613%8 May →
inferno13–6-0.0026%8 May →
dust211–130.0030%8 May →
nuke4–9-0.0920%8 May →
overpass6–90.0131%8 May →
sanctum4–9-0.2233%8 May →
nuke15–15-0.0815%6 May →
cache10–130.0025%6 May →
mirage12–16-0.0313%6 May →
mirage13–110.0111%26 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0813%26 Mar →
nuke3–13-0.0436%26 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0025%26 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0410%25 Mar →
cache_b12–16-0.0231%15 Feb →
mirage13–40.0730%15 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0917%15 Feb →
cache_b13–11-0.0217%14 Feb →
cache_b11–13-0.0628%14 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.1022%13 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.099%13 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0217%10 Feb →
dust213–8-0.0635%10 Feb →
dust215–15-0.0419%10 Feb →
alpine13–5-0.0615%10 Feb →
mirage1–13-0.0711%8 Feb →
nuke15–15-0.0227%30 Jan →
inferno9–13-0.030%30 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.0326%29 Jan →
nuke2–13-0.1015%13 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0224%13 Jan →
mirage13–11-0.0422%13 Jan →
inferno13–7-0.0125%13 Jan →
inferno13–10.0831%13 Jan →
mirage13–9-0.0321%12 Jan →
dust213–10-0.0237%12 Jan →
nuke6–13-0.0725%1 Jan →
dust213–6-0.0425%1 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.1043%23 Nov →
overpass10–13-0.0529%22 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0425%22 Nov →
ancient13–20.0328%22 Nov →
dust214–16-0.0129%22 Nov →
dust24–13-0.1119%13 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0214%12 Nov →
mirage13–8-0.0420%12 Nov →
inferno13–10-0.0218%12 Nov →
mirage16–130.0222%12 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.080%9 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0420%9 Nov →
dust213–9-0.0557%9 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0425%9 Nov →
inferno13–100.0721%9 Nov →
overpass9–13-0.0022%9 Nov →
mirage10–130.0225%9 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0912%9 Nov →
dust213–40.0416%9 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0123%9 Nov →
nuke13–11-0.0221%9 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.