AcilioN

AcilioN — CS2 Stats

PRO“ewewew”EACDenmarkRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198017015164[U:1:56749436]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,897Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,644Top 50% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90518 of 258795 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,897 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,644 +9,538 11 Nov – 19 Oct · 12 days played
10,10619,999peak 19,99911 Nov19 Oct
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
57Days played since 2023-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 355 below peak (19,999)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 356 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAcilioNFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER19,644 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning54
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–42Last 10058%Win rateLLWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 458ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility7.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.6

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.4
Utility7.7
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time526ms+133ms
first ⅓ avg 393ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 10–1 · overpass, 11 Nov →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · anubis, 2 Mar →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 14 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 26 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 81% over 27anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2722–581%0.00
nukeA159–660%-0.01
anubisC145–936%0.00
mirageC114–736%0.00
vertigoA117–464%0.02
infernoC83–538%0.00
overpassS86–275%0.04
dust2—31–233%0.01
train—31–233%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,849Matches
57%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
79.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient17265%1.1815.4
Anubis10858%1.0515.1
Mirage8649%1.0015.3
Nuke7060%1.1816.9
Inferno3554%1.2516.1
Vertigo2352%1.1616.1
Train1638%0.8312.8
Dust21553%1.5316.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$515Inventory value168ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
StatTrak™ AK-47 | Blue Laminate (Minimal Wear)$49StatTrak™ Desert Eagle | Conspiracy (Factory New)$43SSG 08 | Turbo Peek (Minimal Wear)$42StatTrak™ MAC-10 | Toybox (Minimal Wear)$39Lt. Commander Ricksaw | NSWC SEAL$31'The Doctor' Romanov | Sabre$19

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
527msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
14.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4539% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0723%14 Jun →
inferno13–16-0.0128%14 Jun →
inferno13–80.0110%14 Jun →
ancient13–110.0112%14 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.076%13 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.049%8 Jun →
nuke13–7-0.0310%7 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0118%31 May →
train13–90.0122%31 May →
ancient14–16-0.0417%31 May →
ancient13–50.0217%26 May →
nuke16–14-0.0222%26 May →
dust29–13-0.0621%26 May →
nuke8–13-0.0517%22 May →
inferno10–13-0.0413%22 May →
anubis6–13-0.0019%11 May →
train9–130.0520%11 May →
anubis12–16-0.0216%10 May →
inferno9–13-0.0312%10 May →
nuke9–130.0019%27 Apr →
ancient13–30.028%27 Apr →
train11–13-0.0115%27 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0419%25 Apr →
anubis12–16-0.0222%23 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0115%16 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.022%6 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0014%3 Apr →
anubis13–30.0116%30 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0016%23 Jan →
mirage13–40.0414%8 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.0220%8 Jan →
anubis5–130.0213%26 Dec →
vertigo13–90.019%21 Dec →
inferno13–160.0423%18 Dec →
nuke13–90.0117%16 Dec →
nuke11–13-0.0016%13 Dec →
vertigo13–80.0129%11 Dec →
inferno13–11-0.0519%20 Oct →
inferno9–130.0219%21 Aug →
anubis16–140.0124%30 Jul →
mirage13–60.019%25 Jul →
vertigo16–130.1018%15 Jul →
ancient13–20.000%24 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0734%20 Apr →
overpass13–90.000%16 Apr →
ancient13–90.000%16 Apr →
mirage16–120.1518%22 Mar →
anubis13–50.1825%22 Mar →
overpass11–13-0.0221%10 Mar →
overpass10–130.000%7 Mar →
ancient13–110.0321%7 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0115%7 Mar →
ancient13–100.0719%7 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0750%2 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0228%2 Mar →
dust213–40.1643%2 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0335%2 Mar →
nuke13–90.000%29 Feb →
ancient13–50.000%29 Feb →
ancient7–130.000%26 Feb →
ancient13–110.000%26 Feb →
nuke13–70.000%26 Feb →
vertigo16–140.000%26 Feb →
ancient13–10.000%26 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0226%20 Feb →
nuke13–70.000%19 Feb →
overpass13–20.0330%18 Feb →
ancient13–5-0.029%17 Feb →
vertigo8–13-0.089%17 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.0414%16 Feb →
ancient13–2-0.0118%16 Feb →
ancient13–80.0723%16 Feb →
ancient13–3-0.0516%16 Feb →
ancient13–30.0819%16 Feb →
vertigo11–130.0116%15 Feb →
overpass13–70.0225%15 Feb →
vertigo13–20.000%15 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0021%14 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0040%14 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0716%13 Feb →
ancient11–130.000%13 Feb →
ancient13–50.000%13 Feb →
vertigo13–110.0834%12 Feb →
mirage13–80.0129%12 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0219%12 Feb →
vertigo1–130.000%10 Feb →
overpass13–100.000%10 Feb →
vertigo13–10.000%10 Feb →
ancient16–130.000%8 Feb →
nuke5–130.000%6 Feb →
anubis6–130.000%28 Jan →
ancient13–90.000%28 Jan →
overpass13–70.000%28 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0417%11 Dec →
overpass10–10.3023%11 Nov →
anubis9–13-0.0318%21 Sept →
nuke13–50.0021%8 Sept →
inferno13–50.0715%1 Sept →
nuke13–30.080%1 Sept →
vertigo8–160.0415%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.