EngaChick

EngaChick — CS2 Stats

NO76561198016462804[U:1:56197076]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,492Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating7,591Light Blue band · top ~66.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 7,591 → 7,591
+5Tracked matches · now 2,492
+3.4ppWin rate · 41.4% → 44.8%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 27 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,591 +1,534 30 Jun14 Sept · 8 days played
6,0577,591peak 7,59130 Jun14 Sept
7,697Peak Premier in tracked matches
455Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-06-27

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 7,591
  • +1,534 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,409 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEngaChickFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER7,591 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO455csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning35
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46504Last 10046%Win rateWWWWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.6 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility6.7
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning3.5
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time618ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 693ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy12.0%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 28 Jun
37%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · cache, 27 Jul
453msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · anubis, 2 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 28 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB22101245%-0.03
ancientB179853%-0.04
cacheB136746%-0.05
anubisC125742%-0.03
dust2C125742%-0.02
infernoS107370%-0.05
mirageD103730%-0.04
train110100%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.05
overpass1010%0.02
office1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

127Matches
47%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
60.5ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4144%0.6911.2
Nuke3358%0.8812.5
Dust21225%0.598.8
Cache1050%0.599.9
Mirage862%1.0612.1
Overpass838%0.8412.6
Train633%0.486.8
Inferno560%0.617.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.0%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
620msReaction time
19.7%T opening success
30.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
10.14HE damage / grenade
16.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.027% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.6629% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.066%21 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0511%21 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0511%21 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0318%20 Sept
nuke13–9-0.029%20 Sept
ancient7–13-0.093%9 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0820%9 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0111%6 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0414%5 Sept
inferno13–10-0.089%5 Sept
inferno13–90.0114%5 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0810%5 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0815%2 Sept
anubis12–12-0.0617%2 Sept
dust29–13-0.0414%2 Sept
mirage11–130.008%2 Sept
ancient9–130.0015%2 Sept
anubis9–130.0522%31 Aug
anubis13–100.0116%31 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0913%31 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0612%31 Aug
nuke13–3-0.038%30 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0613%30 Aug
dust213–4-0.096%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0213%28 Aug
nuke2–6-0.050%28 Aug
ancient6–13-0.078%28 Aug
nuke10–13-0.1010%28 Aug
dust213–5-0.039%28 Aug
nuke8–130.0316%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.0218%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0310%27 Aug
anubis13–60.0320%27 Aug
ancient13–5-0.069%27 Aug
train13–8-0.0521%26 Aug
inferno8–8-0.086%26 Aug
nuke9–13-0.077%26 Aug
cache13–11-0.0215%26 Aug
cache13–3-0.0513%26 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0212%26 Aug
cache6–13-0.0616%22 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.057%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.107%22 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0714%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0326%21 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0723%21 Aug
inferno1–13-0.087%21 Aug
nuke13–90.0413%21 Aug
ancient13–60.027%21 Aug
dust211–130.0219%21 Aug
dust213–50.0121%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0316%16 Aug
dust21–13-0.066%28 Jul
mirage13–20.018%28 Jul
anubis5–13-0.1014%28 Jul
overpass10–130.0211%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0116%27 Jul
cache13–10-0.0215%27 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0316%27 Jul
dust213–5-0.0224%27 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0118%27 Jul
nuke13–8-0.052%27 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0319%27 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0423%27 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0823%27 Jul
cache3–13-0.0937%27 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0010%27 Jul
mirage9–13-0.078%8 Jul
office9–130.000%8 Jul
nuke7–13-0.060%8 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0213%8 Jul
cache3–13-0.093%8 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0019%8 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0310%5 Jul
nuke13–5-0.007%5 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0318%5 Jul
cache9–13-0.0620%5 Jul
cache13–6-0.0014%5 Jul
dust213–110.0312%1 Jul
anubis12–160.0114%1 Jul
cache11–13-0.0917%1 Jul
nuke10–13-0.1211%1 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0624%1 Jul
nuke8–13-0.076%30 Jun
cache13–6-0.0429%30 Jun
cache13–7-0.0123%30 Jun
nuke9–13-0.018%30 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0410%30 Jun
ancient13–60.009%29 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0913%29 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0319%29 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0411%29 Jun
dust213–16-0.0714%29 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0710%29 Jun
anubis4–13-0.095%28 Jun
nuke13–30.0817%28 Jun
cache11–13-0.0610%28 Jun
nuke13–60.1411%28 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0413%28 Jun
dust25–130.055%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →