nash_

nash_ — CS2 Stats

76561198015906094[U:1:55640366]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,364Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating24,230Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#27033 of 224719 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,364 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 17 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,230 -19 17 Apr10 Sept · 48 days played
23,85626,292peak 26,29217 Apr10 Sept
26,292Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,652Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-04-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,062 below peak (26,292)
  • +320 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,029 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 770 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnash_FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,230 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,652csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning58
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62371Last 10062%Win rateWLWTLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility7.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.8
Utility7.8
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time565ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 13 Jul
67%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · ancient, 2 Jun
391msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · cache, 29 Jul
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 30 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 21ancientWeakest map · 50% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2115671%0.02
mirageA1710759%0.00
cacheA169756%0.04
ancientB147750%0.04
dust2A138562%0.03
anubisS107370%0.02
nukeA74357%0.06
overpass220100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,646Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
81.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage29354%1.2116.9
Anubis13956%1.1516.4
Ancient13851%1.1616.8
Dust211550%1.3316.9
Inferno8540%1.1817.7
Nuke4154%1.2517.5
Vertigo3037%0.9914.1
Train3050%1.5318.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
570msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
49.8%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
11.82HE damage / grenade
16.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6815% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.1017%18 Aug
cache6–13-0.0417%15 Aug
inferno16–140.0314%15 Aug
inferno15–150.0117%13 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0420%10 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0214%8 Aug
dust25–13-0.0120%7 Aug
ancient13–40.0517%6 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0718%5 Aug
cache10–130.0524%4 Aug
cache7–130.0116%4 Aug
ancient13–160.0110%30 Jul
inferno13–10.0424%30 Jul
dust213–6-0.0415%30 Jul
mirage13–10.0423%29 Jul
cache13–70.0324%29 Jul
dust28–130.0015%29 Jul
dust24–13-0.0616%28 Jul
ancient10–130.0212%28 Jul
cache5–13-0.0112%27 Jul
dust213–20.0314%27 Jul
ancient13–10.1718%27 Jul
nuke13–80.0012%23 Jul
cache13–9-0.009%22 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0327%22 Jul
anubis9–130.0318%18 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0121%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0120%17 Jul
nuke11–130.0417%16 Jul
ancient13–50.0715%16 Jul
dust213–80.1216%16 Jul
mirage13–20.1120%15 Jul
inferno11–130.0416%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.0110%15 Jul
dust213–50.0517%14 Jul
cache13–80.048%14 Jul
cache16–120.0814%14 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0129%13 Jul
ancient13–20.1721%13 Jul
dust213–100.1319%13 Jul
cache13–100.0615%9 Jul
cache6–130.0018%9 Jul
inferno13–100.0720%9 Jul
cache13–90.1026%8 Jul
cache13–20.0523%7 Jul
cache13–60.0618%7 Jul
cache7–130.1024%7 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0424%3 Jul
ancient13–90.0614%2 Jul
inferno13–80.0036%2 Jul
dust213–20.0731%2 Jul
mirage13–90.0216%29 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0520%29 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0216%25 Jun
anubis10–130.0014%23 Jun
dust25–130.0116%17 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0324%17 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0726%11 Jun
anubis13–6-0.018%9 Jun
nuke13–70.1116%4 Jun
mirage11–130.0119%4 Jun
anubis16–140.0611%3 Jun
mirage13–90.0331%2 Jun
ancient5–00.0167%2 Jun
inferno13–50.0326%27 May
overpass13–7-0.0718%27 May
inferno13–100.1223%26 May
overpass13–80.0524%26 May
anubis13–80.1022%26 May
ancient6–13-0.0417%25 May
inferno16–12-0.0320%25 May
mirage11–13-0.0211%25 May
anubis11–130.0118%24 May
nuke13–50.1030%24 May
nuke11–130.0419%14 May
ancient13–20.0818%14 May
mirage13–10-0.0113%14 May
dust213–40.0417%13 May
mirage4–130.0117%13 May
ancient5–13-0.0813%11 May
mirage2–13-0.0630%11 May
mirage13–80.0315%8 May
inferno13–40.1531%8 May
ancient10–13-0.0119%8 May
inferno13–110.1321%8 May
mirage13–10.0114%7 May
ancient9–130.0426%7 May
mirage4–13-0.0122%6 May
inferno7–130.0114%5 May
nuke8–130.0022%5 May
anubis13–40.0921%5 May
dust213–50.0621%24 Apr
inferno13–60.1415%24 Apr
nuke13–10.1124%22 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0024%21 Apr
anubis13–110.049%21 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0016%20 Apr
mirage13–70.0319%18 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0320%17 Apr
inferno13–3-0.0616%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →