Azzap

Azzap — CS2 Stats

76561198015562497[U:1:55296769]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,161Tracked matches21%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,129Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,572 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,572 → 1,572
+8Tracked matches · now 3,161
−1.5ppWin rate · 22.2% → 20.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 15 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

23,569Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,572Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-06-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,572
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 179 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-12
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches8
Win rate13%
K/D0.88
Headshot %50%

Measured 12 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.9%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy17.6%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.821.061.070.25 short
Match win rate45.7%46.3%46.9%1.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAzzapFACEITLevel 8 · 1,572 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,572csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning52
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD29629Last 10029%Win rateLLLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time605ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–0 · dust2, 7 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · dust2, 10 Jul
344msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · dust2, 10 Jul
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 2 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 31% over 62cacheWeakest map · 20% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D62194331%0.00
cacheD2041620%0.00
mirageD92722%-0.01
inferno42250%-0.03
nuke31233%0.02
anubis1010%0.02
ancient110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

158,065Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
6,721Matches
45.7%Match win rate
50.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
16,328MVPs
4,129Hours (in match)
9,423Bombs planted
1,878Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4760,223
AWP18,382
P2502,830
MP92,011
FAMAS1,875

Lifetime map wins

11,250inferno
11,230dust2
3,086nuke
2,068train
1,127vertigo
884cbble
199office
60lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

985Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
75.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1030%0.8213.2
Dust2757%1.2018.0
Ancient540%0.9615.2
Inferno475%1.3416.8
Overpass1100%0.9314.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
88.8%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
609msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
6.45HE damage / grenade
14.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.9135% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0228%17 Sept
dust29–13-0.0420%17 Sept
mirage9–13-0.034%15 Sept
dust213–110.0320%15 Sept
nuke2–130.0013%14 Sept
dust26–130.1124%14 Sept
dust28–130.0333%13 Sept
dust210–13-0.0323%13 Sept
dust28–130.0525%11 Sept
dust210–130.0731%11 Sept
cache3–130.0322%10 Sept
dust213–9-0.0420%10 Sept
dust213–11-0.0222%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.0026%9 Sept
dust211–130.0128%9 Sept
dust213–70.0332%9 Sept
cache12–120.0118%8 Sept
mirage6–2-0.070%8 Sept
dust213–110.0027%7 Sept
cache11–130.0220%7 Sept
dust210–13-0.0327%6 Sept
dust26–13-0.0131%6 Sept
dust29–13-0.0233%5 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0626%5 Sept
cache5–130.0633%5 Sept
dust26–13-0.0134%2 Sept
dust211–130.0419%31 Aug
anubis5–130.0223%31 Aug
dust28–130.0033%30 Aug
dust25–130.0437%28 Aug
dust213–110.0730%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0223%20 Aug
cache9–130.0339%19 Aug
dust28–130.1131%19 Aug
dust26–13-0.0727%4 Aug
dust212–12-0.0327%4 Aug
mirage12–120.1319%3 Aug
mirage1–3-0.0320%3 Aug
dust212–120.0338%3 Aug
dust213–90.0240%31 Jul
dust29–130.0158%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0217%29 Jul
dust26–130.0439%24 Jul
dust213–11-0.0622%24 Jul
dust213–30.0032%23 Jul
cache7–13-0.0115%23 Jul
dust213–9-0.0331%22 Jul
dust25–13-0.0222%20 Jul
dust210–130.0147%20 Jul
dust28–130.0032%19 Jul
dust213–70.0114%19 Jul
dust28–13-0.0332%17 Jul
dust213–10-0.0229%15 Jul
dust213–80.0327%15 Jul
dust213–70.0220%14 Jul
dust213–100.0728%13 Jul
cache13–6-0.0321%13 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0027%13 Jul
cache11–13-0.0226%12 Jul
cache12–120.0030%12 Jul
dust23–13-0.0715%11 Jul
dust210–13-0.0144%11 Jul
cache3–13-0.0723%10 Jul
dust213–11-0.0230%10 Jul
dust22–13-0.0511%10 Jul
dust20–3-0.03100%10 Jul
cache13–80.0436%9 Jul
cache13–80.0223%9 Jul
dust29–130.0332%9 Jul
cache5–130.0332%9 Jul
dust212–120.0018%8 Jul
cache10–130.0030%7 Jul
dust29–00.1350%7 Jul
dust212–12-0.0132%7 Jul
cache13–11-0.0532%6 Jul
dust210–130.0322%6 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0121%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0420%5 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0321%5 Jul
mirage6–130.0033%3 Jul
cache7–130.0335%3 Jul
dust213–6-0.0240%3 Jul
dust24–13-0.0614%2 Jul
dust26–13-0.0220%2 Jul
mirage0–8-0.0629%2 Jul
dust23–13-0.0436%2 Jul
nuke13–10.0426%2 Jul
nuke5–80.0127%1 Jul
cache10–13-0.0325%1 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0514%21 Jun
cache3–13-0.0330%21 Jun
cache12–12-0.0044%20 Jun
dust26–13-0.0724%20 Jun
dust213–11-0.0223%20 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0628%19 Jun
dust26–13-0.0439%19 Jun
dust212–120.0925%17 Jun
dust29–13-0.0137%16 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0332%15 Jun
cache2–130.0423%15 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →