JigglyBeef

JigglyBeef — CS2 Stats

GB76561198013713455[U:1:53447727]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,404Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
4,241Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,072 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,072 → 1,072
+4Tracked matches · now 2,404
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 55 days played since 13 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,902 -2,054 13 May1 Jul · 17 days played
12,63116,151peak 16,15113 May1 Jul
16,151Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,072Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,072
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 129 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches4
Win rate50%
K/D0.92
Headshot %36%

Measured 18 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,275), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.7%44.8%45.7%3.0% short
Shot accuracy0.6%12.5%12.7%12.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.031.050.17 short
Match win rate45.0%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJigglyBeefFACEITLevel 6 · 1,072 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,072csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning42
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateWTLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 41% on T to 24% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.2
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time590ms−78ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy13.1%−5.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 23 Jun
45%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · inferno, 22 May
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 28 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 23 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 54% over 24dust2Weakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB24131154%-0.02
infernoB178947%-0.02
nukeB147750%-0.03
dust2D134931%-0.02
mirageB136746%-0.01
cacheC94544%-0.05
ancientB63350%-0.02
overpass31233%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,385Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
2,771Matches
45.0%Match win rate
42.7%Headshot %
0.6%Shot accuracy
4,661MVPs
1,148Hours (in match)
5,340Bombs planted
744Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,126
AWP3,172
AUG1,571
XM10141,410
FAMAS1,242

Lifetime map wins

4,282inferno
3,857dust2
3,849nuke
1,937vertigo
307train
95office
29italy
8ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

555Matches
54%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
66.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11855%1.0113.6
Inferno10455%0.9211.8
Anubis8753%0.9113.5
Dust26656%0.9012.8
Nuke5349%0.9014.6
Ancient4850%0.9014.1
Cache4151%0.8612.3
Vertigo2259%0.9411.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
584msReaction time
41.0%T opening success
24.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
4.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0693% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 24.0463% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–11-0.0319%20 Sept
anubis15–150.0316%15 Sept
dust27–13-0.0314%13 Sept
cache8–13-0.0319%13 Sept
inferno13–100.0116%13 Sept
anubis13–10-0.085%13 Sept
dust23–13-0.080%13 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0817%6 Sept
cache6–13-0.105%6 Sept
dust24–130.0019%5 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0110%4 Sept
vertigo13–70.018%4 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0413%2 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0114%30 Aug
anubis13–60.0318%28 Aug
inferno13–50.006%24 Aug
anubis15–15-0.058%21 Aug
inferno10–13-0.047%20 Aug
anubis13–20.0710%19 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0417%18 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0311%17 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0011%17 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0912%13 Aug
nuke6–13-0.1220%8 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0315%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0718%7 Aug
anubis13–7-0.044%7 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0321%1 Aug
cache13–10-0.0625%28 Jul
anubis14–16-0.069%28 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0619%27 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0912%26 Jul
cache19–22-0.0414%25 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0313%23 Jul
cache9–13-0.0521%23 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0311%22 Jul
anubis17–190.0615%22 Jul
nuke13–70.0211%19 Jul
inferno13–30.0119%19 Jul
ancient13–10-0.004%18 Jul
cache11–13-0.0624%10 Jul
anubis13–50.0018%10 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0213%10 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0012%8 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0111%5 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0019%5 Jul
ancient14–16-0.016%1 Jul
anubis13–60.0511%1 Jul
inferno13–50.0215%30 Jun
dust213–40.0119%29 Jun
anubis8–130.0017%28 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0118%28 Jun
nuke9–130.018%28 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0215%26 Jun
inferno13–70.0316%26 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0526%26 Jun
anubis13–90.0327%24 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0716%24 Jun
overpass13–5-0.079%23 Jun
cache16–12-0.0216%23 Jun
mirage13–00.1020%23 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0316%22 Jun
anubis13–6-0.054%21 Jun
nuke13–40.043%20 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0712%14 Jun
dust213–100.0624%4 Jun
mirage1–13-0.074%4 Jun
inferno5–13-0.047%3 Jun
cache13–8-0.0310%3 Jun
mirage1–130.0230%3 Jun
inferno13–40.0321%3 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0614%2 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0212%2 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0414%2 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0315%31 May
nuke13–11-0.0611%30 May
mirage13–80.0013%29 May
dust213–4-0.013%29 May
inferno8–13-0.0112%26 May
mirage6–13-0.0614%26 May
dust25–13-0.0719%26 May
mirage5–13-0.0533%22 May
inferno0–13-0.1245%22 May
mirage6–13-0.0321%21 May
nuke9–13-0.0514%21 May
mirage11–13-0.0115%21 May
nuke13–90.0324%20 May
ancient13–110.0210%20 May
overpass8–130.0224%19 May
anubis11–13-0.0621%19 May
mirage13–30.0623%15 May
dust213–40.0328%15 May
mirage13–50.0331%15 May
anubis14–16-0.0513%14 May
dust210–13-0.0517%14 May
nuke9–13-0.0111%14 May
dust23–13-0.0516%13 May
mirage13–7-0.0823%13 May
dust27–13-0.0320%13 May
dust27–130.0018%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →