BÄRDITO

BÄRDITO — CS2 Stats

WF76561198011281660[U:1:51015932]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,637Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,549Top 1% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1634 of 232031 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,637 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 7 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,549 -438 23 Mar18 Sept · 7 days played
28,54929,322peak 29,32223 Mar18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,665 +0 7 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
2,6652,665peak 2,6657 Sept18 Sept
29,372Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,665Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-03-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,665
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 335 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 773 below peak (29,322)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 1,451 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBÄRDITOPREMIER28,549 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,665csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning64
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateLLLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.7
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time547ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 4 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · inferno, 15 Mar
344msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 13 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 30 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L4Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 19ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB23121152%0.01
nukeB22101245%-0.00
anubisA1911858%0.01
overpassC1661038%-0.01
cacheC73443%-0.00
ancientD62433%-0.01
mirage31233%-0.03
dust232167%0.02
vertigo1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,800Matches
53%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
74.8ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno26055%1.0014.4
Nuke24659%1.0115.0
Anubis16350%0.9915.3
Overpass11856%1.0014.8
Ancient8944%0.9415.8
Vertigo7548%1.0315.1
Mirage5145%1.0516.2
Dust23355%0.9415.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.7%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
547msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.46HE damage / grenade
8.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1676% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–13-0.1012%13 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0544%13 Sept
cache10–13-0.0423%12 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0615%30 Aug
inferno13–80.0223%24 Aug
cache13–80.0726%8 Jul
cache11–13-0.0322%6 Jul
nuke13–70.0320%25 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0125%25 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0118%25 Jun
nuke6–130.0331%25 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0214%24 Jun
nuke5–13-0.049%6 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0610%6 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0021%6 Jun
nuke13–60.0829%3 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0428%2 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0516%1 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0616%30 May
anubis13–10.1113%30 May
nuke11–13-0.0330%20 May
nuke15–190.0118%19 May
nuke13–6-0.0228%13 May
cache12–120.0219%12 May
inferno13–9-0.0015%12 May
anubis13–90.0125%10 May
inferno3–130.0424%10 May
inferno13–80.1610%4 May
cache13–100.0418%4 May
anubis13–100.0222%4 May
cache13–70.0116%4 May
nuke3–130.0022%4 May
nuke1–8-0.0425%4 May
ancient1–13-0.0319%2 May
dust213–80.0427%28 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0113%7 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0218%6 Apr
inferno13–50.0226%4 Apr
anubis22–19-0.0217%3 Apr
overpass11–130.0027%3 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0128%3 Apr
anubis13–60.0722%3 Apr
inferno11–130.0121%3 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0112%2 Apr
overpass6–130.0324%2 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0320%2 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0221%2 Apr
nuke16–140.0621%26 Mar
overpass13–70.0224%26 Mar
inferno13–110.0418%26 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0611%26 Mar
anubis7–13-0.028%26 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0115%25 Mar
overpass13–20.0021%25 Mar
nuke13–80.0923%23 Mar
anubis13–40.0319%23 Mar
dust213–100.0326%21 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0114%21 Mar
anubis13–50.0513%21 Mar
inferno13–50.0439%20 Mar
overpass13–30.0219%19 Mar
anubis13–60.0615%19 Mar
nuke13–16-0.0519%19 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0431%19 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0327%18 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0110%18 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0211%17 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0327%17 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0117%17 Mar
overpass13–16-0.0226%15 Mar
overpass13–16-0.0119%15 Mar
overpass9–7-0.1213%15 Mar
nuke9–3-0.0325%15 Mar
vertigo8–8-0.0624%15 Mar
inferno9–40.0212%15 Mar
inferno6–9-0.0950%15 Mar
ancient13–5-0.0110%14 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0120%14 Mar
inferno13–30.0716%13 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0121%12 Mar
inferno13–100.0520%12 Mar
ancient11–130.0123%12 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0114%12 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0212%12 Mar
dust20–3-0.0120%12 Mar
inferno13–20.1216%11 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0221%11 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0030%10 Mar
anubis16–13-0.0221%10 Mar
overpass9–130.0317%10 Mar
inferno7–13-0.048%9 Mar
overpass11–130.0013%9 Mar
nuke13–80.0027%8 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0220%8 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0918%8 Mar
nuke13–100.0119%8 Mar
nuke16–140.0211%8 Mar
overpass11–130.0318%8 Mar
ancient13–100.0631%7 Mar
mirage13–80.0422%7 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →