Gjøs ☕

Gjøs ☕ — CS2 Stats

76561198010504383[U:1:50238655]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

629Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 629 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 24 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,877 +2,378 29 Nov6 Jul · 21 days played
17,23519,886peak 19,88629 Nov6 Jul
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,395Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2025-11-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,395
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 136 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGjøs ☕PEAK ELO1,395csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning43
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53434Last 10053%Win rateWWWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility6.8
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.3
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time612ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 2 Dec
55%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · ancient, 19 May
422msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 3 Jul
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 2 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA29161355%-0.01
nukeA2113862%-0.01
anubisS1511473%0.01
mirageD113827%-0.01
overpassD103730%0.00
cacheS54180%-0.01
infernoC52340%-0.04
poseidon2020%-0.05
train21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

127Matches
57%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
83.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3057%1.2017.7
Ancient2467%1.1417.5
Nuke1953%1.2117.4
Inferno1759%1.0114.3
Mirage1560%1.4617.5
Vertigo560%1.2116.4
Dust2333%0.6410.3
Overpass367%1.1319.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
603msReaction time
18.9%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
8.23HE damage / grenade
15.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.9157% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–130.0013%1 Sept
ancient22–18-0.0318%30 Aug
ancient13–110.0033%30 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0222%30 Jul
cache13–6-0.0510%25 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0016%25 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0821%25 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0334%21 Jul
cache13–10-0.0519%21 Jul
nuke13–8-0.039%21 Jul
anubis13–110.0329%15 Jul
anubis13–50.0212%13 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0522%13 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0326%13 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0616%13 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0514%13 Jul
mirage11–130.0325%9 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0438%9 Jul
ancient13–30.0325%8 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0332%8 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0316%6 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0318%6 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0417%6 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0629%6 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0336%6 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0417%3 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0131%3 Jul
cache13–30.0326%1 Jul
anubis13–90.0616%1 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0020%7 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0113%7 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0710%3 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0121%3 Jun
poseidon0–5-0.190%3 Jun
cache13–60.0418%19 May
ancient0–13-0.0455%19 May
nuke6–10.0045%19 May
anubis13–6-0.0118%19 May
overpass10–10.0517%7 May
nuke3–13-0.0611%5 May
anubis13–60.0223%5 May
ancient8–13-0.0322%4 May
cache8–13-0.0118%4 May
nuke13–10-0.0119%21 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0242%22 Mar
poseidon8–80.0834%22 Mar
mirage5–130.0022%22 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0812%16 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0024%16 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0125%16 Mar
ancient13–30.1022%12 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0529%11 Mar
anubis13–60.0519%11 Mar
nuke13–80.0022%11 Mar
ancient6–130.0225%11 Mar
ancient13–80.0516%5 Mar
ancient13–70.0919%5 Mar
anubis13–2-0.0232%26 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0325%26 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0331%22 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0315%22 Feb
mirage13–100.0317%22 Feb
anubis13–30.0025%22 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0126%22 Feb
ancient13–50.0726%15 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0121%10 Feb
anubis7–130.0618%10 Feb
ancient13–4-0.0115%9 Feb
ancient13–70.0221%3 Feb
overpass1–13-0.100%3 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0321%3 Feb
anubis6–130.0321%2 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0426%2 Feb
mirage15–15-0.0140%1 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0018%1 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0124%20 Jan
anubis13–90.0032%20 Jan
nuke13–100.0714%18 Jan
overpass11–130.0118%18 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0439%18 Jan
mirage5–130.0127%15 Jan
ancient10–130.0229%15 Jan
train5–13-0.0523%15 Jan
ancient16–120.0016%12 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0116%3 Jan
inferno12–16-0.0714%3 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0615%3 Jan
nuke13–50.0033%3 Jan
ancient16–140.0113%3 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0027%14 Dec
overpass11–20.0925%14 Dec
mirage13–16-0.0220%14 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0323%7 Dec
train13–80.0222%2 Dec
nuke13–10.1723%2 Dec
ancient13–10-0.0430%2 Dec
overpass10–130.0021%1 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0429%29 Nov
overpass7–13-0.0421%29 Nov
overpass13–20.0919%24 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →