Clavis — CS2 Stats

76561198010177888[U:1:49912160]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,514Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,288Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4224 of 23140 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,069 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning50

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateWTLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2

Aggression6.3

Utility7.0

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning5.0

Utility7.0

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time580ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms

Headshot accuracy21.4%+1.5%

first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–2

13–2Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 13ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	26	10–16	38%	0.01
inferno	C	17	6–11	35%	-0.02
anubis	B	13	6–7	46%	0.02
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	0.03
cache	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.01
overpass	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
mirage	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.02
ancient	D	5	1–4	20%	0.04
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07
warden	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

375Matches

55%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

73.4ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	61	54%	1.12	14.2
Dust2	33	58%	0.92	12.9
Inferno	28	68%	1.02	14.7
Nuke	24	29%	0.76	12.5
Overpass	13	54%	0.82	12.6
Ancient	13	46%	1.25	18.0
Anubis	9	44%	0.97	12.1
Train	8	25%	0.83	10.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy

36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.5%Spray accuracy

83.1%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

571msReaction time

28.4%T opening success

54.8%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

7.9%Flash assists

10.28HE damage / grenade

12.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.422% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–7	0.01	33%	20 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.02	26%	20 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.05	20%	20 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.03	27%	20 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.08	17%	20 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.01	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	19%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	14%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.07	23%	18 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	28%	15 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.02	21%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	29%	14 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	21%	13 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.05	15%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.05	21%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	16%	12 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	13%	12 Aug →
train	4–13	0.07	25%	12 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	37%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	13%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.09	23%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	17%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	23%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.04	26%	2 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	20%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	21%	26 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	23%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	21%	26 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	22%	23 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.00	25%	23 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.11	15%	20 Jul →
inferno	0–13	-0.06	0%	20 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.02	42%	19 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.00	22%	19 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.06	11%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	13%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.04	25%	19 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.11	20%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.07	22%	16 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	23%	16 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	5%	14 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.04	17%	14 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.02	13%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	13%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	13%	13 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	15%	13 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.02	13%	13 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	11%	12 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.05	24%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	20%	11 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.01	16%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.16	23%	11 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	38%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.04	27%	11 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	11%	6 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.00	13%	6 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	26%	6 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	16%	6 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	32%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	14%	5 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.08	12%	5 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.10	29%	5 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.05	24%	5 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.09	26%	5 Jul →
nuke	16–13	0.05	20%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.06	21%	5 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.02	15%	3 Jul →
warden	9–13	0.01	16%	3 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	9%	2 Jul →
overpass	14–16	0.00	22%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.03	16%	2 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.00	35%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	7%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	9%	30 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.07	17%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.05	29%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.05	6%	27 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	27%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	19%	27 Jun →
overpass	4–13	-0.09	18%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.02	18%	27 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.02	27%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.05	19%	27 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.01	38%	26 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.04	28%	25 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	15%	24 Jun →
overpass	2–13	-0.06	24%	24 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.02	22%	24 Jun →
overpass	4–13	-0.03	23%	24 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.04	22%	24 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	11%	24 Jun →
inferno	11–2	-0.05	11%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.00	20%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	17%	23 Jun →
overpass	13–8	-0.02	21%	23 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	33%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.04	21%	23 Jun →