k6z ;.

k6z ;. — CS2 Stats

76561198009733857[U:1:49468129]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,656Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,846Top 25% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24840 of 258913 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,846 -2,875 20 Jun – 16 Oct · 19 days played
24,33729,507peak 29,50720 Jun16 Oct
29,664Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,124Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-06-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,124
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 376 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,661 below peak (29,507)
  • -3,814 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 154 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGk6z ;.PREMIER24,846 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,124csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning57
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateLWWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility6.6
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.7
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time514ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 12–12 · overpass, 24 Jun →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 10–0 · office, 8 Jul →
297msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · anubis, 12 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 13 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3013–1743%-0.00
mirageD175–1229%-0.03
ancientB168–850%-0.02
anubisA117–464%0.01
nukeC94–544%0.00
cacheS96–367%0.01
infernoD51–420%-0.01
overpass—21–150%0.03
office—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,019Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
77.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust235451%1.0915.1
Ancient27951%0.9915.1
Mirage27445%0.9714.1
Anubis23650%0.9213.9
Inferno17451%1.0014.0
Nuke11649%0.9414.6
Overpass8450%0.9514.9
Vertigo4551%1.1215.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
515msReaction time
61.2%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.33HE damage / grenade
13.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–160.0516%16 Oct →
mirage13–50.0115%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0220%14 Oct →
cache13–90.0212%14 Oct →
anubis7–130.0112%3 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0021%3 Oct →
ancient13–70.0130%3 Oct →
dust213–30.1119%3 Oct →
nuke8–130.0218%3 Oct →
dust29–130.0319%2 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.109%30 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0032%30 Sept →
mirage9–130.0316%26 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0220%26 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0513%26 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0414%26 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0328%26 Sept →
mirage2–8-0.0314%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0617%20 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0121%20 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0925%15 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0312%13 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0718%12 Sept →
dust24–13-0.028%12 Sept →
anubis0–4-0.020%12 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0426%12 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0516%6 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0612%6 Sept →
mirage4–6-0.0727%24 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0119%22 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0029%21 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0639%21 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0125%21 Jul →
mirage13–50.0221%15 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0318%15 Jul →
dust213–60.0124%14 Jul →
dust24–130.0524%14 Jul →
ancient13–80.0122%13 Jul →
nuke10–130.0323%13 Jul →
nuke13–00.0113%13 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0117%9 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0322%9 Jul →
office10–00.0540%8 Jul →
cache13–30.0333%8 Jul →
mirage13–110.0625%5 Jul →
inferno7–130.0728%5 Jul →
dust23–7-0.028%5 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0133%5 Jul →
ancient13–100.0216%5 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0215%5 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0911%4 Jul →
dust213–10.1216%3 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0120%3 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0510%2 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0420%2 Jul →
ancient0–8-0.1425%1 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.054%1 Jul →
nuke13–110.0222%1 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.1427%30 Jun →
dust215–150.0216%30 Jun →
anubis16–140.0116%29 Jun →
dust213–90.0516%29 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0335%29 Jun →
anubis16–14-0.0013%29 Jun →
dust213–160.0127%28 Jun →
overpass13–8-0.0727%28 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0215%28 Jun →
anubis13–90.0218%28 Jun →
dust213–4-0.0414%28 Jun →
dust213–110.0223%28 Jun →
dust27–130.0124%28 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0416%27 Jun →
anubis13–110.0513%26 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0118%26 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0414%26 Jun →
inferno3–130.0220%26 Jun →
anubis3–130.0727%26 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.029%25 Jun →
dust23–13-0.039%25 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0420%24 Jun →
dust213–70.0623%24 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0419%24 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0114%24 Jun →
overpass12–120.1419%24 Jun →
cache13–50.0521%24 Jun →
mirage13–70.0112%24 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0316%23 Jun →
ancient16–140.0217%22 Jun →
dust216–12-0.0112%22 Jun →
dust27–130.0121%22 Jun →
dust213–50.0220%21 Jun →
ancient13–50.0017%21 Jun →
dust27–13-0.084%21 Jun →
dust213–4-0.0225%21 Jun →
cache12–120.0819%21 Jun →
cache13–5-0.0115%21 Jun →
mirage15–15-0.0419%20 Jun →
cache13–50.0419%20 Jun →
anubis13–90.0113%19 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0416%19 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.