Iqpl

Iqpl — CS2 Stats

GA76561198007664742[U:1:47399014]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

589Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,289Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 10 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,749 +507 10 May6 Jun · 19 days played
16,54619,307peak 19,30710 May6 Jun
19,407Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2025-05-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning49
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateWLLWWTLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · −43ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility5.6
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning4.9
Utility5.6
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time585ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 15 May
29%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 6 Feb
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 6 Mar
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 23 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 14ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC31112035%-0.01
overpassC2071335%-0.01
anubisA149564%0.00
dust2A148657%0.01
ancientD93633%-0.00
nukeA85363%-0.00
inferno43175%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,384Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
4,664Matches
42.0%Match win rate
35.6%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
8,981MVPs
2,121Hours (in match)
5,844Bombs planted
1,164Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,989
AWP12,330
P2504,929
SSG 082,751
Tec-92,048
P901,977

Lifetime map wins

8,738dust2
5,827inferno
2,707nuke
1,024train
947cbble
190vertigo
122lake
70shorttrain

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

299Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
88.3ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage786%1.2715.7
Nuke667%1.1817.0
Anubis580%1.3421.6
Dust25100%1.3815.4
Ancient3100%1.0423.3
Cache10%0.7213.0
Inferno1100%1.4320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
67.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
586msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
7.96HE damage / grenade
8.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.6523% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8168% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0220%27 Aug
anubis3–13-0.114%18 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0219%17 Aug
anubis13–70.0219%17 Aug
inferno13–100.059%13 Aug
dust215–150.0217%22 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0725%22 Jul
inferno16–120.046%22 Jul
ancient10–130.0114%22 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0712%6 Jun
dust22–13-0.0321%6 Jun
mirage10–130.029%6 Jun
anubis16–130.0412%6 Jun
overpass13–50.0218%12 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0710%20 Mar
overpass13–9-0.029%20 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0427%14 Mar
anubis11–13-0.004%14 Mar
overpass13–80.0210%14 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0211%14 Mar
mirage13–50.0721%14 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0220%6 Mar
nuke13–40.014%6 Mar
overpass10–130.009%6 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0520%6 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0218%20 Feb
anubis13–110.088%20 Feb
nuke16–12-0.0016%14 Feb
dust213–50.037%13 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0620%13 Feb
dust213–50.0110%13 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0411%13 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0615%13 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0219%12 Feb
anubis11–13-0.065%12 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0316%10 Feb
nuke15–15-0.029%7 Feb
dust27–13-0.0120%7 Feb
anubis13–160.025%7 Feb
mirage13–50.0313%7 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0529%6 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0310%6 Feb
nuke13–70.0316%6 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0011%6 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0314%30 Jan
dust213–100.0519%30 Jan
mirage13–110.0112%30 Jan
anubis13–110.0211%24 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0313%24 Jan
dust213–3-0.054%23 Jan
overpass13–16-0.048%23 Jan
anubis13–10.0818%23 Jan
mirage9–13-0.028%20 Dec
ancient13–80.0316%6 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0718%6 Dec
nuke13–70.0718%29 Nov
mirage10–4-0.0617%29 Nov
dust213–100.037%22 Nov
mirage9–130.0011%21 Nov
overpass13–100.0117%21 Nov
dust29–130.019%31 Oct
mirage13–50.0013%31 Oct
overpass8–130.0421%25 Sept
overpass6–13-0.0510%19 Sept
mirage12–160.0411%18 Sept
overpass16–130.0319%18 Sept
ancient13–80.0911%18 Sept
overpass13–90.0210%17 Sept
mirage10–13-0.067%17 Sept
overpass14–160.0422%13 Sept
overpass16–14-0.0020%12 Sept
dust213–20.0724%12 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0614%19 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0115%19 Jul
dust213–60.033%19 Jul
mirage16–14-0.028%4 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0310%4 Jul
mirage13–40.0618%4 Jul
overpass11–13-0.0223%14 Jun
mirage8–130.0114%14 Jun
nuke13–50.0413%14 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0511%14 Jun
anubis13–50.0711%6 Jun
dust28–13-0.074%30 May
mirage13–16-0.0313%28 May
anubis13–70.0019%28 May
nuke11–13-0.065%23 May
mirage13–30.1110%23 May
mirage16–13-0.0312%17 May
anubis13–9-0.047%17 May
mirage15–15-0.038%17 May
mirage13–50.0416%16 May
dust25–13-0.0624%16 May
ancient13–6-0.0310%16 May
nuke2–13-0.077%15 May
dust213–100.1117%15 May
ancient5–100.025%15 May
mirage10–13-0.0311%10 May
inferno2–13-0.0719%10 May
anubis4–13-0.0411%10 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →