mr — CS2 Stats

76561198004938446[U:1:44672718]✓ No bans

711Tracked matches66%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating24,955Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2029 of 11826 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

24,955Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 24,955
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 45 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning43

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT63–36–1Last 10063%Win rateWWWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim7.2

Aggression2.3

Utility6.4

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch8.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning4.3

Utility6.4

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time538ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms

Headshot accuracy15.8%−3.3%

first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — cache 13–1

13–0Biggest win — inferno

7Longest win streak

W3Current streak

12–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 17infernoWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	21	14–7	67%	-0.02
ancient	A	19	11–8	58%	-0.02
cache	S	17	12–5	71%	0.01
mirage	S	16	11–5	69%	-0.01
nuke	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.03
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.03
overpass	—	4	4–0	100%	0.06
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.05
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches

51%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

60.6ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	6	50%	0.60	10.2
Dust2	6	83%	0.73	10.7
Nuke	4	50%	0.85	14.8
Inferno	3	33%	0.88	16.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.56	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy

34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.9%Spray accuracy

79.3%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

535msReaction time

13.7%T opening success

43.4%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

13.0%Flash assists

8.32HE damage / grenade

7.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 13.7397% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–4	-0.02	6%	27 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.01	24%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.05	9%	26 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.10	10%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	26%	25 Aug →
ancient	6–10	0.01	11%	21 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	16%	20 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.01	26%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	14%	19 Aug →
overpass	13–6	-0.01	16%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	15%	19 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.08	8%	19 Aug →
dust2	2–1	-0.07	25%	19 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	-0.06	13%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	15%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.07	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.00	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	12%	14 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	10%	14 Aug →
overpass	13–7	0.18	14%	9 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.02	23%	6 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.07	10%	6 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	18%	6 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.01	18%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	15%	6 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	19%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	16%	30 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	19%	27 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	8%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.06	23%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.04	17%	27 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	14%	27 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.09	15%	25 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.01	13%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	20%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	11%	24 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.02	12%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	16%	23 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	11%	23 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	8%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	10%	23 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	33%	22 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	15%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	21%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	27%	21 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	18%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	21%	17 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.08	0%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	11%	16 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.05	17%	16 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	24%	16 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	24%	16 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	26%	16 Jul →
nuke	6–2	-0.13	22%	16 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.03	10%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	8%	14 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	32%	13 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	26%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	8%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.03	17%	11 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	16%	10 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	14%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	16%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	16%	10 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.07	19%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.00	18%	9 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.00	10%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	23%	9 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.01	31%	9 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.06	32%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.00	15%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	18%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	20%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	19%	7 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.21	12%	7 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.02	16%	7 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	8%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	13%	5 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.09	40%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–0	0.03	35%	26 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	30%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.08	17%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.04	18%	18 Jun →
nuke	13–6	-0.05	9%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.03	20%	18 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	18%	18 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.02	21%	16 Jun →
dust2	22–19	-0.04	21%	12 Jun →
ancient	14–16	-0.03	22%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	19%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.06	17%	8 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	14%	8 Jun →
mirage	4–0	0.07	11%	8 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.01	25%	8 Jun →
dust2	14–16	-0.06	9%	8 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	18%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	19%	4 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.05	10%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.01	21%	4 Jun →