[k]ermit — CS2 Stats

UM76561198004742657[U:1:44476929]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

895Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 Developing

Premier CS Rating19,523Purple band · top ~10.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4885 of 9993 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,180 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52

Positioning52

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–42–6Last 10052%Win rateTWWLWWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2

Aggression6.8

Utility5.2

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2

Positioning5.2

Utility5.2

Mechanics3.2

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact8.1

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time534ms−41ms

first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms

Headshot accuracy12.9%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — ancient 13–8

13–3Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 11anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	24	13–11	54%	-0.00
mirage	B	18	9–9	50%	0.00
ancient	B	13	6–7	46%	0.00
nuke	B	13	7–6	54%	0.00
anubis	D	12	4–8	33%	0.00
inferno	S	11	9–2	82%	0.02
cache	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.00
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

193Matches

54%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

80.9ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	56	59%	1.14	15.9
Mirage	45	47%	1.16	14.0
Inferno	24	67%	1.25	16.7
Ancient	21	52%	1.10	14.9
Anubis	19	58%	1.02	14.3
Nuke	17	41%	1.07	17.5
Overpass	5	60%	1.23	14.6
Cache	4	25%	1.12	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy

33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.2%Spray accuracy

64.4%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

534msReaction time

40.0%T opening success

36.5%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

2.2%Flash assists

9.40HE damage / grenade

11.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.3551% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 36.5036% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	15–15	0.01	5%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	8%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.07	5%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	19%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.06	13%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	17%	23 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	13%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.08	10%	16 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.06	21%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.05	11%	9 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.04	14%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.08	15%	8 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	9%	8 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	11%	8 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.08	12%	5 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.03	7%	5 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	20%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	11%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	13%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	17%	25 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.01	27%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	14%	21 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.00	26%	21 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	9%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.05	11%	20 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.05	10%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.07	10%	20 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.01	10%	19 Jul →
nuke	16–12	-0.01	6%	19 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.03	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.05	8%	19 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	13%	15 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.01	5%	12 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.01	9%	12 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	9%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.05	7%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–11	-0.01	14%	5 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	11%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	10%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.06	27%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.02	11%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.04	4%	28 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	8%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	10%	27 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.03	6%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.06	6%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	16%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.01	17%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.14	13%	26 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	10%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.03	14%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.05	20%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.07	14%	21 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	17%	21 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.00	14%	21 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.13	10%	21 Jun →
ancient	4–13	0.01	19%	21 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.07	8%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.06	8%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.01	19%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.02	8%	20 Jun →
anubis	6–13	0.07	7%	20 Jun →
mirage	4–2	0.14	13%	20 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.01	12%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.04	10%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	11%	19 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.05	14%	19 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.04	13%	19 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.01	20%	19 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	10%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	16%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.01	10%	15 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.00	20%	14 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	19%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.05	4%	14 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.05	7%	14 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	3%	14 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	10%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	9%	13 Jun →
cache	16–12	0.01	8%	12 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	8%	12 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.09	8%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	11%	10 Jun →
overpass	7–13	0.00	6%	9 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.11	15%	9 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	10%	9 Jun →
inferno	16–13	0.03	17%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	19%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	13%	7 Jun →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	6%	7 Jun →
ancient	0–13	-0.12	0%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.00	13%	5 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.11	14%	4 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	6%	3 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	16%	3 Jun →
dust2	2–13	0.01	16%	30 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	13%	30 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	17%	30 May →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	25%	30 May →