tonj ⛴

tonj ⛴ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198004468043[U:1:44202315]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,960Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating22,358Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#47055 of 231786 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,580 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Jul 2026 (78 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 3 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,358 -398 3 Jan4 Jul · 13 days played
20,40122,867peak 22,8673 Jan4 Jul
22,867Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,580Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2026-01-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,580
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 420 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8

Premier CS Rating

  • 509 below peak (22,867)
  • -165 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,642 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtonj ⛴FACEITLevel 10 · 2,580 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,358 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,580csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning58
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46531Last 10046%Win rateWWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +6.7pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility7.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.4

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.8
Utility7.6
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time575ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 9 Jan
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 6 Sept
398msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 27 Jan
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 9 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 21ancientWeakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C32141844%0.02
infernoS2114767%0.05
ancientD2061430%0.03
nukeB137654%0.03
mirage41325%0.04
overpass43175%0.04
cache3030%-0.06
anubis2020%0.03
train110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,546Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
77.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient32448%1.0115.8
Dust230649%1.0415.9
Inferno28952%1.0114.9
Nuke27557%1.0115.3
Overpass9253%1.0115.4
Anubis7332%0.8514.7
Mirage3847%0.8813.2
Train2642%0.9916.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
581msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
10.23HE damage / grenade
19.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9346% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.0016%8 Sept
dust219–16-0.0026%7 Sept
nuke13–90.0347%6 Sept
dust213–6-0.0138%6 Sept
inferno13–20.0632%24 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0122%20 Aug
ancient13–40.0622%20 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0119%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0133%11 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0122%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0626%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0417%29 Jul
inferno13–2-0.0219%27 Jul
inferno13–50.0636%23 Jul
dust26–13-0.0213%22 Jul
cache2–13-0.0715%21 Jul
ancient17–19-0.0514%19 Jul
inferno13–90.0821%4 Jul
mirage7–130.0424%4 Jul
dust213–110.0325%4 Jul
inferno13–30.0324%2 Jul
cache6–13-0.0516%2 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0313%2 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0414%2 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0019%28 Jun
ancient10–130.0137%27 Jun
inferno13–60.0516%26 Jun
ancient13–160.0418%25 Jun
dust216–140.0928%23 Jun
inferno13–60.2035%23 Jun
nuke13–110.0139%17 Jun
inferno13–10.1727%7 Jun
dust213–10-0.0224%7 Jun
cache10–13-0.068%24 May
nuke13–60.1947%21 May
ancient7–130.1136%21 May
dust210–130.0427%21 May
ancient7–13-0.0522%19 May
inferno13–70.1328%17 May
dust212–160.0841%17 May
nuke8–130.0320%17 May
inferno10–130.0522%6 May
ancient6–13-0.0828%6 May
dust213–7-0.0226%3 May
ancient2–13-0.0326%22 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0116%22 Apr
dust26–130.0526%22 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0121%7 Apr
ancient13–80.0028%7 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0219%5 Apr
dust26–13-0.0328%4 Apr
nuke10–130.0626%28 Mar
inferno13–50.2024%27 Mar
nuke14–160.0423%27 Mar
inferno13–160.0520%26 Mar
dust29–13-0.0333%23 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0422%15 Mar
dust213–8-0.0621%13 Mar
ancient8–130.0124%11 Mar
dust28–130.0028%11 Mar
overpass13–8-0.0314%11 Mar
dust29–13-0.0324%11 Mar
dust24–13-0.054%7 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0322%7 Mar
ancient13–100.0033%6 Mar
dust213–90.1126%6 Mar
ancient13–40.0930%6 Mar
inferno7–130.0423%6 Mar
dust26–130.0429%6 Mar
ancient15–150.0623%27 Feb
dust210–13-0.0418%21 Feb
dust213–30.0628%15 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0129%9 Feb
ancient9–130.0427%31 Jan
inferno10–130.0242%30 Jan
dust27–130.0326%30 Jan
dust213–110.0133%28 Jan
ancient11–130.0645%28 Jan
nuke13–90.0116%28 Jan
overpass16–130.1121%27 Jan
ancient13–50.1331%27 Jan
dust26–130.0329%27 Jan
anubis5–130.0627%27 Jan
dust28–130.0232%25 Jan
mirage9–130.0226%24 Jan
dust213–90.0818%24 Jan
nuke13–100.0033%24 Jan
overpass2–13-0.0121%24 Jan
inferno7–130.0128%24 Jan
mirage13–80.0827%24 Jan
dust213–10-0.0317%24 Jan
dust213–16-0.0041%18 Jan
overpass16–140.1122%17 Jan
nuke13–90.0724%17 Jan
ancient13–90.2028%17 Jan
mirage7–130.0324%17 Jan
train13–100.0421%15 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0131%15 Jan
dust213–00.2727%9 Jan
dust211–130.0930%3 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →