FLAVOR FLAV

FLAVOR FLAV — CS2 Stats

CO76561198003724030[U:1:43458302]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,155Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,032 → 3,032
+3Tracked matches · now 3,155
0.0ppWin rate · 33.3% → 33.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 26 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,052 +1,626 15 Jan21 Apr · 13 days played
24,37027,032peak 27,03215 Jan21 Apr
Faceit ELO: 3,032 +0 29 Aug4 Sept · 3 observations
3,0323,032peak 3,03229 Aug4 Sept
27,032Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,032Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2025-12-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,032
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 468 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFLAVOR FLAVPEAK ELO3,032csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning53
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43543Last 10043%Win rateLLLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −5.8pp headshot accuracy · −114ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 403ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 423ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.0
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time509ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 9 Mar
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 1 Feb
359msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 1 Feb
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 14 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 48% over 31nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31151648%0.02
mirageB27131448%0.01
ancientC1971237%-0.01
infernoC73443%-0.03
nukeD61517%-0.03
overpass41325%0.01
cache32167%-0.02
anubis31233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,487Matches
58%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
86.6ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
26Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage64858%1.0716.7
Dust238060%1.1316.6
Ancient28752%1.0616.6
Anubis18251%1.0115.9
Inferno8746%1.0817.3
Vertigo6360%1.0516.7
Nuke3633%0.9817.1
Overpass2850%1.1216.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
532msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
8.55HE damage / grenade
8.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0212% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage0–9-0.010%3 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0723%31 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0533%31 Aug
cache13–9-0.0128%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1217%15 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0510%15 Jul
dust213–1-0.0114%14 Jul
dust20–13-0.080%14 Jul
ancient2–130.0318%4 Jul
dust23–130.0114%4 Jul
dust21–130.0021%29 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0320%29 Jun
mirage5–130.0024%28 Jun
dust24–13-0.0125%28 Jun
dust219–170.0527%25 Jun
cache13–90.0116%25 Jun
dust213–90.0820%25 Jun
dust29–13-0.0415%22 Jun
ancient7–130.0232%21 Jun
dust213–9-0.0215%15 Jun
dust213–30.0618%14 Jun
dust213–70.0231%14 Jun
cache10–13-0.0718%31 May
mirage22–18-0.0118%31 May
dust21–13-0.0139%18 May
anubis2–13-0.0825%18 May
overpass8–130.0113%17 May
ancient11–130.0014%16 May
ancient16–140.0221%16 May
ancient8–13-0.0614%16 May
nuke0–13-0.0925%14 May
dust25–13-0.0213%14 May
dust26–13-0.0421%12 May
nuke6–13-0.0431%12 May
mirage7–130.0228%29 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0613%29 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0615%26 Apr
dust29–20.0314%21 Apr
mirage13–50.0522%20 Apr
dust24–13-0.0515%2 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0223%2 Apr
mirage13–110.0529%12 Mar
dust213–20.1326%12 Mar
anubis13–70.0426%12 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0321%9 Mar
dust213–50.1522%9 Mar
mirage12–70.0432%9 Mar
dust215–150.0624%6 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0623%6 Mar
dust213–90.0719%6 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0227%28 Feb
mirage13–50.0129%24 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0625%21 Feb
dust27–13-0.0113%21 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0314%14 Feb
ancient3–13-0.075%14 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0117%13 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0426%13 Feb
dust27–13-0.0224%13 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0415%12 Feb
dust211–13-0.0226%12 Feb
mirage5–13-0.039%7 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0423%7 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0112%6 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0114%6 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0119%5 Feb
dust213–60.1123%5 Feb
overpass13–40.015%5 Feb
ancient13–40.0315%5 Feb
mirage13–50.0622%2 Feb
mirage13–40.0143%1 Feb
mirage0–13-0.058%1 Feb
mirage13–40.0629%1 Feb
mirage13–80.1219%29 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0220%29 Jan
mirage13–50.0422%29 Jan
dust213–11-0.0025%29 Jan
anubis10–130.0113%25 Jan
dust213–110.0724%25 Jan
dust213–90.0320%25 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0019%25 Jan
mirage15–150.0915%25 Jan
mirage13–100.0714%19 Jan
mirage8–130.0321%17 Jan
overpass15–150.0420%17 Jan
overpass3–13-0.0111%15 Jan
nuke13–30.0538%15 Jan
mirage11–130.0818%13 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0114%13 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0012%12 Jan
dust28–130.0424%11 Jan
ancient13–6-0.066%7 Jan
ancient13–110.0520%7 Jan
ancient10–00.1030%7 Jan
dust26–13-0.0330%7 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0524%6 Jan
ancient13–70.1017%4 Jan
dust213–5-0.0113%30 Dec
dust211–13-0.0025%29 Dec
mirage19–160.0215%26 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →