htdgmp3

htdgmp3 — CS2 Stats

PL76561198000305725[U:1:40039997]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,663Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 4,663 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 5 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 30,120 +2,577 5 Nov7 Jan · 5 days played
27,00630,120peak 30,1205 Nov7 Jan
Faceit ELO: 3,113 +0 29 Aug18 Sept · 5 observations
3,1133,113peak 3,11329 Aug18 Sept
30,120Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,113Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2025-11-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,113
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 387 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhtdgmp3PEAK ELO3,113csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning49
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57421Last 10057%Win rateLLWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 453ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 465ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility6.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning4.9
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time488ms−126ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 488ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 3–0 · mirage, 7 Jan
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · mirage, 7 Jan
383msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 1 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 2 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 74% over 19anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA34201459%-0.01
nukeS1914574%0.01
ancientA148657%0.01
dust2B137654%0.00
anubisD93633%-0.00
overpassC52340%-0.03
cache32167%-0.01
inferno2020%-0.02
train110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10,500Matches
55%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
90.0ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
24Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient71258%1.2117.8
Mirage71058%1.2217.7
Anubis44155%1.1316.8
Nuke30960%1.2617.8
Dust222043%1.0517.4
Vertigo19965%1.2817.8
Overpass4850%1.1416.3
Inferno1547%1.1517.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.7%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
480msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
8.19HE damage / grenade
9.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7341% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage0–7-0.0820%12 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0410%21 Aug
nuke13–70.0219%5 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0127%5 Aug
ancient10–130.0025%5 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0719%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0530%3 Aug
mirage13–90.0120%3 Aug
nuke22–18-0.0219%3 Aug
nuke13–20.0824%2 Aug
cache13–30.0313%2 Aug
ancient13–70.0216%2 Aug
anubis13–70.0018%2 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0430%1 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0323%1 Aug
nuke13–90.0120%31 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0217%30 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0614%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0113%30 Jul
dust216–12-0.0216%30 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0325%29 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0426%29 Jul
nuke13–110.0931%29 Jul
dust213–4-0.0438%29 Jul
ancient7–130.0432%28 Jul
mirage22–20-0.0030%28 Jul
cache10–13-0.0814%28 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0432%27 Jul
cache13–60.0035%27 Jul
dust210–130.0031%26 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0019%26 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0020%24 Jul
dust28–13-0.0231%17 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0613%17 Jul
anubis5–130.0217%4 Jul
nuke16–130.0220%10 Jun
mirage13–70.0225%2 May
anubis16–14-0.0024%27 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0315%23 Apr
nuke8–130.0624%23 Apr
train13–60.0936%22 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0512%22 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0715%20 Apr
dust213–16-0.0215%17 Apr
anubis16–14-0.0216%15 Apr
dust213–80.0531%13 Apr
dust213–80.0619%9 Apr
mirage13–110.0423%3 Apr
mirage13–10.0448%2 Apr
dust24–00.0046%2 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0421%19 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0122%18 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0122%18 Mar
mirage13–60.0826%16 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0122%12 Mar
dust213–110.0322%12 Mar
inferno1–130.0121%11 Mar
mirage13–50.0831%11 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0726%11 Mar
ancient10–130.0320%6 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0223%26 Feb
mirage13–30.0220%25 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0220%14 Feb
dust25–13-0.0153%14 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0125%12 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0419%6 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0228%1 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0227%1 Feb
nuke8–130.0223%31 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0221%28 Jan
anubis4–130.0423%27 Jan
dust213–80.0443%22 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0019%18 Jan
anubis6–13-0.0131%18 Jan
dust212–16-0.0329%15 Jan
nuke13–60.0319%7 Jan
overpass13–8-0.0824%7 Jan
ancient13–10.0918%7 Jan
nuke13–4-0.0014%7 Jan
ancient13–110.0125%7 Jan
mirage3–00.10100%7 Jan
mirage13–30.0726%7 Jan
mirage13–7-0.1019%7 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0515%6 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0321%6 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0415%6 Jan
mirage13–40.0137%6 Jan
dust26–13-0.0125%6 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0126%6 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0017%6 Jan
ancient13–70.0630%5 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0119%5 Jan
nuke13–40.0429%5 Jan
ancient13–60.0721%4 Jan
mirage13–160.0023%4 Jan
nuke13–4-0.0236%4 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0110%28 Nov
mirage13–80.0026%20 Nov
overpass5–130.0321%5 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0119%5 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →