k0nfu

k0nfu — CS2 Stats

DE76561198000227737[U:1:39962009]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,050Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating17,549Purple band · top ~18.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,610 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,050 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 11 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,549 -5,108 11 May – 6 Sept · 24 days played
15,73323,247peak 23,24711 May6 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,610 +0 1 Sept – 6 Sept · 2 observations
1,6101,610peak 1,6101 Sept6 Sept
23,515Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,610Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-05-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,610
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 141 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,698 below peak (23,247)
  • +673 over 30 days · improving
  • -3,816 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,451 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGk0nfuFACEITLevel 8 · 1,610 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,549 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,610csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning64
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWWWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch4.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time616ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–9 · dust2, 8 Jul →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 30 Jun →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · anubis, 2 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
2–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 26nukeWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2619–773%0.01
dust2B2210–1245%0.01
nukeD164–1225%0.02
anubisS107–370%0.04
overpassC83–538%-0.00
mirageC73–443%0.01
infernoS64–267%0.02
cache—41–325%0.00
poseidon—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

324Matches
53%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
76.3ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2962%1.0616.1
Dust22741%1.0415.9
Mirage2756%1.0816.7
Anubis2065%1.2518.4
Inferno1833%0.8713.8
Overpass1436%1.0715.5
Nuke862%1.1419.6
Cache367%1.3519.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.3%Spray accuracy
90.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
612msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
62.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
6.58HE damage / grenade
12.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8056% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0122%26 Aug →
ancient13–20.106%25 Aug →
ancient13–90.0310%25 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.073%25 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0014%24 Aug →
mirage8–130.0027%18 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0410%18 Aug →
anubis13–70.1217%16 Aug →
ancient13–70.0623%16 Aug →
mirage11–130.0117%16 Aug →
anubis15–150.0016%16 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0328%13 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0418%13 Aug →
anubis13–80.0823%11 Aug →
nuke13–10.0420%11 Aug →
nuke11–130.0912%11 Aug →
dust28–130.0013%11 Aug →
mirage9–130.0218%6 Aug →
cache13–70.1118%6 Aug →
ancient13–10.0111%6 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0118%6 Aug →
dust213–70.0212%4 Aug →
inferno13–100.0517%4 Aug →
nuke16–140.1024%3 Aug →
dust24–130.0413%3 Aug →
dust27–130.0517%2 Aug →
anubis9–00.0619%2 Aug →
nuke8–130.0217%2 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0123%28 Jul →
ancient13–70.0218%28 Jul →
ancient13–3-0.0118%28 Jul →
nuke13–50.086%28 Jul →
nuke11–130.0516%26 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0513%26 Jul →
ancient13–110.0114%26 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0130%25 Jul →
anubis9–130.0619%25 Jul →
ancient13–40.0133%25 Jul →
ancient10–130.0116%25 Jul →
cache13–16-0.0321%24 Jul →
inferno13–80.108%24 Jul →
dust213–10.1022%24 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0011%19 Jul →
cache5–13-0.099%12 Jul →
dust26–130.017%12 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0721%12 Jul →
dust213–90.1323%8 Jul →
nuke10–130.0510%8 Jul →
ancient9–130.0314%5 Jul →
inferno13–60.0418%5 Jul →
dust213–90.1019%5 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0115%5 Jul →
ancient13–80.0621%4 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0110%4 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0225%4 Jul →
ancient13–50.0928%4 Jul →
overpass15–150.0119%4 Jul →
nuke13–160.0223%2 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0119%2 Jul →
overpass5–13-0.0929%2 Jul →
anubis13–40.0113%2 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.0210%30 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0125%30 Jun →
dust213–70.0741%30 Jun →
anubis13–90.0713%30 Jun →
anubis13–80.068%30 Jun →
ancient13–100.079%28 Jun →
ancient1–13-0.110%28 Jun →
dust24–130.0314%28 Jun →
ancient13–6-0.0214%27 Jun →
overpass10–130.0123%27 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.0416%26 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0118%26 Jun →
ancient13–60.0413%26 Jun →
mirage13–80.0518%26 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0423%12 Jun →
overpass13–10.1031%12 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0219%11 Jun →
ancient16–130.0718%11 Jun →
dust27–13-0.038%11 Jun →
overpass10–130.0127%10 Jun →
cache12–120.0325%10 Jun →
nuke11–130.0921%10 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0914%10 Jun →
nuke15–15-0.0314%31 May →
dust213–4-0.0219%31 May →
overpass11–13-0.0119%31 May →
nuke13–160.0213%31 May →
mirage12–160.0018%19 May →
overpass13–30.0016%19 May →
ancient13–60.0915%19 May →
anubis13–90.016%19 May →
poseidon9–6-0.029%19 May →
ancient8–130.0122%19 May →
ancient13–9-0.0112%17 May →
nuke6–13-0.0515%17 May →
dust29–13-0.0420%14 May →
ancient13–6-0.0618%14 May →
ancient13–7-0.0620%14 May →
dust213–9-0.039%11 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →