Vasikka — CS2 Stats

76561197998621520[U:1:38355792]

1,929Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,210Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,908 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning50

Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0

Aggression5.3

Utility7.2

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning5.0

Utility7.2

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time593ms−85ms

first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms

Headshot accuracy18.6%+0.5%

first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–2

13–1Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	23	7–16	30%	-0.01
mirage	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.01
inferno	S	15	10–5	67%	0.02
cache	B	14	7–7	50%	0.00
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.00
anubis	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.03
nuke	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

797Matches

51%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

79.9ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

15%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	69	51%	0.91	14.1
Dust2	64	61%	1.04	15.1
Mirage	55	42%	0.88	14.2
Anubis	45	42%	1.07	15.3
Inferno	40	48%	1.09	15.1
Nuke	33	52%	0.96	15.8
Overpass	25	48%	0.97	13.7
Cache	12	58%	0.98	18.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

85.8%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

594msReaction time

25.9%T opening success

48.2%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

10.7%Flash assists

12.49HE damage / grenade

9.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.8527% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	16–13	0.07	21%	27 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.06	8%	26 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	15%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.06	22%	26 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	22%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.00	22%	21 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	18%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	21%	21 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	23%	16 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	24%	16 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	22%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	29%	16 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	14%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	25%	15 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.03	20%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.07	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	27%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.04	13%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	18%	14 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	20%	13 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.08	16%	13 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	18%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	13%	13 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	27%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	13%	11 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	23%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	11%	11 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.01	24%	10 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	12%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	10%	10 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	9%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	11%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.06	9%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	28%	8 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	18%	7 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	15%	1 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	13%	1 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	26%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	25%	1 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.09	25%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	12%	29 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	21%	28 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.07	12%	28 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	16%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	11%	27 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.06	9%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.07	10%	27 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	19%	27 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.09	11%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	9%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	13%	24 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	9%	24 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	26%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	10%	23 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	17%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.01	17%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.08	20%	23 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	19%	23 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	13%	22 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.04	15%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	8%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	20%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.01	14%	22 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.01	15%	22 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	19%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.09	11%	21 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.02	12%	21 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	26%	21 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	19%	21 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	13%	20 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	21%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	18%	19 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	16%	19 Jul →
nuke	4–9	-0.06	6%	19 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.09	21%	18 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	10%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.04	27%	17 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	21%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.04	13%	14 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	21%	14 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	18%	12 Jul →
ancient	2–13	0.02	16%	12 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.13	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	16%	12 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	24%	11 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	15%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	21%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.08	35%	5 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	18%	29 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	30%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.05	19%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.01	10%	15 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.05	28%	15 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.04	15%	13 Jun →
inferno	16–13	0.01	11%	13 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.07	13%	7 Jun →
cache	4–13	-0.10	10%	7 Jun →