smesh

smesh — CS2 Stats

76561197998557511[U:1:38291783]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,046Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating17,682Purple band · top ~17.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,579 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,682 -2,171 15 Jul – 24 Oct · 33 days played
17,68223,836peak 23,83615 Jul24 Oct
23,836Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,579Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-07-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,579
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 172 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 6,154 below peak (23,836)
  • -2,318 over 30 days · declining
  • -4,166 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,318 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsmeshFACEITLevel 8 · 1,579 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,682 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,579csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning53
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateLLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch6.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.3
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time588ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 16 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 6 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 11 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
3–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2610–1638%-0.01
mirageA2313–1057%-0.01
infernoD123–925%-0.01
ancientC114–736%-0.01
anubisB105–550%-0.02
nukeS107–370%0.03
cacheD82–625%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

222Matches
53%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
76.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

54%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4161%0.9713.9
Dust24045%1.0516.4
Inferno3650%1.0615.5
Ancient3554%1.0815.9
Nuke3355%1.1615.4
Anubis1759%0.8412.5
Cache771%1.0315.3
Overpass650%0.9712.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
584msReaction time
38.2%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
10.2%Flash assists
8.96HE damage / grenade
14.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.1689% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0215%24 Oct →
anubis11–130.0118%13 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0113%13 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0813%9 Oct →
cache8–13-0.056%30 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0515%30 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0714%23 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0311%23 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0525%23 Sept →
dust29–13-0.036%22 Sept →
ancient13–40.073%16 Sept →
nuke13–10.1520%16 Sept →
dust29–130.0126%16 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0118%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.086%13 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.075%9 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0412%8 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0611%6 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0832%6 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0312%2 Sept →
cache13–80.0619%2 Sept →
dust213–70.0426%2 Sept →
dust219–160.0417%29 Aug →
nuke13–110.0526%26 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0617%26 Aug →
mirage10–130.0115%26 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0215%26 Aug →
dust27–130.0823%26 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0613%25 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.056%24 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0419%24 Aug →
dust28–13-0.055%24 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0118%23 Aug →
cache13–70.0717%23 Aug →
anubis13–30.0513%23 Aug →
nuke11–130.0415%23 Aug →
dust210–130.0113%21 Aug →
dust210–130.0216%21 Aug →
dust27–130.0216%21 Aug →
inferno13–40.0721%20 Aug →
nuke4–130.0119%20 Aug →
cache11–130.0417%20 Aug →
nuke13–70.0418%20 Aug →
mirage13–100.0411%19 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0316%19 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0423%18 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0214%18 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0316%18 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0710%17 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0013%16 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0513%14 Aug →
inferno0–130.0116%14 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.037%14 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0114%12 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0318%12 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.074%11 Aug →
ancient13–100.0519%6 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0212%6 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0118%6 Aug →
cache12–16-0.0020%6 Aug →
inferno13–40.0110%5 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0617%5 Aug →
dust213–50.0219%5 Aug →
mirage15–150.0014%4 Aug →
dust23–13-0.064%4 Aug →
mirage10–20.0712%4 Aug →
dust213–80.0331%3 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.120%3 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0412%3 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.048%3 Aug →
anubis13–80.0213%3 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0113%3 Aug →
mirage16–130.0422%29 Jul →
ancient4–7-0.048%29 Jul →
mirage13–90.0616%25 Jul →
inferno11–130.0120%25 Jul →
dust213–70.0020%25 Jul →
nuke16–130.0215%24 Jul →
dust213–60.0514%23 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0019%17 Jul →
inferno13–60.138%16 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.049%16 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0912%16 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0316%16 Jul →
ancient13–80.0411%16 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0818%16 Jul →
inferno15–150.0314%15 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.036%15 Jul →
nuke13–30.0517%15 Jul →
dust20–13-0.0627%15 Jul →
mirage13–60.0310%14 Jul →
ancient13–40.0114%14 Jul →
mirage13–90.0115%14 Jul →
mirage2–130.036%13 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0010%13 Jul →
mirage13–30.0215%13 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.059%13 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0516%13 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0112%13 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0222%13 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.