miiRz. — CS2 Stats

JM76561197998506184[U:1:38240456]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,576Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,337Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3430 of 29959 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning50

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–38–7Last 10055%Win rateTLWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6

Aggression5.2

Utility6.8

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning5.0

Utility6.8

Mechanics4.3

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time591ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms

Headshot accuracy26.6%+6.4%

first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — shelter 13–10

13–2Biggest win — train

6Longest win streak

7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 25% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	0.00
mirage	S	15	10–5	67%	0.01
ancient	S	15	10–5	67%	0.02
anubis	S	12	8–4	67%	0.00
dust2	D	12	3–9	25%	-0.01
nuke	C	11	4–7	36%	0.02
cache	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.01
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.11
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

164Matches

51%Win rate

1.00Avg K/D

—ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy

32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.7%Spray accuracy

69.5%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

586msReaction time

30.4%T opening success

44.2%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

8.2%Flash assists

10.13HE damage / grenade

10.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.4189% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	15–15	-0.02	31%	28 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	26%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.05	18%	28 Aug →
ancient	6–0	0.04	38%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	26%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	27%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	32%	26 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	24%	26 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	19%	25 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.03	27%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	19%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	19%	22 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	25%	22 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	33%	18 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	39%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	37%	17 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	36%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	15%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	20%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	31%	15 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.03	26%	14 Aug →
train	13–2	0.04	24%	13 Aug →
train	10–13	0.04	37%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	18%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.14	32%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	17%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	23%	11 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.04	23%	10 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	26%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	20%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	36%	5 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	17%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.05	39%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.01	23%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.10	16%	4 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.07	26%	4 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	-0.05	20%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	41%	31 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.07	19%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	36%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.03	25%	30 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	30%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.01	26%	28 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	13%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.10	23%	25 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.08	18%	25 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	12%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.04	11%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	17%	24 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.01	30%	24 Jul →
cache	16–12	-0.02	14%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.09	24%	24 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.02	22%	24 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.01	30%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	17%	23 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.08	29%	23 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	22%	21 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.04	28%	21 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	28%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	26%	21 Jul →
dust2	8–4	-0.02	26%	21 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.08	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	13%	20 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	28%	20 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	25%	20 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	33%	20 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	9%	20 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	20%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	11%	18 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.04	24%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	21%	17 Jul →
cache	13–2	-0.01	21%	17 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.03	20%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	22%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.07	11%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	18%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	18%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	25%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	36%	14 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	31%	13 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.05	27%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	14%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	24%	13 Jul →
office	13–8	0.02	12%	13 Jul →
office	7–13	0.02	30%	13 Jul →
fachwerk	9–13	-0.11	0%	10 Jul →
boulder	13–5	0.05	27%	10 Jul →
shelter	13–10	0.14	35%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.03	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.00	23%	9 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	12%	9 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	26%	6 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	16%	6 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	14%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	12%	5 Jul →
ancient	3–13	0.03	22%	5 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.05	9%	4 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.07	24%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	24%	30 Jun →