Ike Sarkin(Selling XM's Rounds)

Ike Sarkin(Selling XM's Rounds) — CS2 Stats

IL76561197997439737[U:1:37174009]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,058Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,382Blue band · top ~37% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIke Sarkin(Selling XM's R…FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,382 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning61
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–49–8Last 10043%Win rateLTLWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +8.1pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility6.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning6.1
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time534ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–0 · vertigo, 1 Nov →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · italy, 10 Nov →
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · anubis, 9 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 1 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 24overpassWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC2710–1737%0.00
cacheA2414–1058%-0.00
vertigoD155–1033%-0.01
anubisB137–654%-0.00
italyD62–433%-0.02
overpassD60–60%-0.03
dust2—32–167%0.02
ancient—20–20%-0.06
train—22–0100%-0.03
nuke—10–10%-0.07
inferno—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
42%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
—ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage30%1.2021.0
Inferno20%1.0721.5
Ancient1100%1.8018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
68.9%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
538msReaction time
51.7%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
13.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
italy7–13-0.0732%10 Nov →
vertigo12–12-0.0313%10 Nov →
cache10–130.0119%10 Nov →
cache7–9-0.0126%5 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.0722%5 Nov →
dust22–13-0.0316%5 Nov →
vertigo9–13-0.0119%2 Nov →
cache13–80.0732%2 Nov →
vertigo13–00.1021%1 Nov →
anubis13–90.0215%1 Nov →
cache8–0-0.036%1 Nov →
cache12–120.0317%1 Nov →
overpass11–13-0.0313%31 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.029%31 Oct →
italy13–90.0414%31 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0217%31 Oct →
italy13–11-0.0111%31 Oct →
cache13–30.0511%30 Oct →
dust213–60.0719%29 Oct →
cache13–100.0817%29 Oct →
office10–13-0.088%28 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0522%26 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0329%25 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0121%15 Oct →
office5–13-0.0130%15 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0119%15 Oct →
office11–130.0412%15 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0918%15 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0713%15 Oct →
dust213–80.0122%14 Oct →
office13–10.0918%14 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0314%14 Oct →
office6–13-0.0328%12 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0316%12 Oct →
cache13–70.067%8 Oct →
train13–5-0.0212%8 Oct →
office10–130.0324%30 Sept →
office10–13-0.0128%26 Sept →
office11–130.0921%24 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0021%24 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0711%24 Sept →
office8–130.0412%22 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0424%22 Sept →
office3–13-0.0421%18 Sept →
anubis13–40.0419%18 Sept →
office11–13-0.0519%14 Sept →
italy12–12-0.0118%14 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0913%10 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0721%9 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0317%9 Sept →
overpass10–13-0.068%9 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0611%8 Sept →
cache13–50.0510%8 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0214%7 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0212%6 Sept →
italy12–12-0.0716%6 Sept →
office13–80.0114%6 Sept →
cache5–120.0213%6 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0416%4 Sept →
office9–13-0.0318%3 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0518%3 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0123%2 Sept →
office8–13-0.0011%2 Sept →
anubis13–40.0621%1 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0220%26 Aug →
overpass6–9-0.104%26 Aug →
office6–13-0.0320%26 Aug →
italy3–13-0.0230%25 Aug →
vertigo13–8-0.0229%24 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0429%16 Aug →
vertigo13–1-0.0525%16 Aug →
office13–11-0.0023%16 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0014%5 Aug →
anubis12–12-0.0316%5 Aug →
overpass4–9-0.038%27 Jul →
anubis13–90.038%27 Jul →
vertigo3–13-0.0011%17 Jul →
office13–80.0618%16 Jul →
vertigo2–13-0.0719%16 Jul →
overpass6–90.0221%6 Jul →
office13–8-0.029%6 Jul →
cache7–130.0220%2 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0416%2 Jul →
office13–9-0.0220%28 Jun →
cache6–130.0411%28 Jun →
office4–13-0.0032%27 Jun →
train13–7-0.0411%19 Jun →
overpass7–9-0.0024%14 Jun →
cache4–5-0.0424%14 Jun →
office13–100.0411%10 Jun →
cache13–50.0014%10 Jun →
office10–13-0.0518%9 Jun →
vertigo7–130.0014%9 Jun →
office13–40.0317%29 May →
anubis13–90.0811%29 May →
office13–70.0311%26 May →
office10–130.0419%21 May →
office13–9-0.0624%20 May →
office9–130.0119%17 May →
vertigo12–12-0.0116%6 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.