Follow recoil Enjoyer

Follow recoil Enjoyer — CS2 Stats

76561197997372351[U:1:37106623]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,985Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,481Top 50% of 205,709 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74717 of 252990 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,657 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,481 -4,273 19 Aug – 10 Oct · 18 days played
18,42824,754peak 24,75419 Aug10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,657 +0 1 Sept – 23 Sept · 4 observations
2,6572,657peak 2,6571 Sept23 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,657Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,657
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 343 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,273 below peak (24,754)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,519 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFollow recoil EnjoyerFACEITLevel 10 · 2,657 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER20,481 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,657csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning63
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.7
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.3
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time494ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 479ms → last ⅓ avg 494ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 17 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–5 · inferno, 6 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 9 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2614–1254%0.05
anubisB209–1145%0.02
mirageC198–1142%0.01
dust2A1710–759%0.03
nukeD91–811%0.01
ancientA53–260%0.04
inferno—32–167%0.05
vertigo—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,988Matches
52%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
85.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust224658%1.3818.7
Mirage19748%1.1817.3
Anubis16849%1.2718.3
Inferno8859%1.3518.2
Nuke8048%1.3616.6
Ancient7552%1.2017.1
Cache5765%1.6820.9
Vertigo4255%1.3117.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
500msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
10.8%Flash assists
7.17HE damage / grenade
19.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9533% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.1116%10 Oct →
cache11–130.1615%10 Oct →
anubis4–130.0616%10 Oct →
cache13–100.0015%7 Oct →
inferno1–5-0.00100%6 Oct →
ancient13–80.0522%4 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0012%4 Oct →
anubis13–40.0310%4 Oct →
cache6–00.1029%4 Oct →
ancient13–110.0411%4 Oct →
dust213–90.0915%4 Oct →
anubis13–100.0521%4 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0312%4 Oct →
mirage11–130.0331%3 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0455%3 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0215%3 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0717%2 Oct →
mirage13–30.1433%2 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0125%2 Oct →
nuke15–190.0217%2 Oct →
cache0–70.0516%1 Oct →
ancient4–130.0112%30 Sept →
cache6–13-0.018%27 Sept →
cache13–60.0820%27 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0215%26 Sept →
anubis13–10.0211%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0120%26 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0026%26 Sept →
cache13–90.1413%25 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0218%24 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0520%23 Sept →
inferno16–130.0324%22 Sept →
cache13–60.0714%20 Sept →
cache13–50.1927%17 Sept →
dust213–80.0741%15 Sept →
cache12–160.0017%15 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0224%15 Sept →
anubis12–120.0823%14 Sept →
dust213–110.1623%14 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0127%12 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0323%11 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0117%10 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0418%10 Sept →
dust213–60.0521%10 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0620%9 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0711%9 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0520%9 Sept →
cache22–200.0725%8 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0016%8 Sept →
mirage25–22-0.0211%8 Sept →
anubis13–50.098%7 Sept →
cache13–70.0124%6 Sept →
cache7–130.0819%6 Sept →
anubis8–130.0327%6 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0824%6 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0219%5 Sept →
mirage8–130.0014%5 Sept →
anubis13–20.0217%5 Sept →
cache13–50.0512%5 Sept →
mirage16–19-0.0316%4 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0116%4 Sept →
dust216–140.0010%4 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0315%2 Sept →
anubis12–160.0221%2 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0124%1 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0720%30 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0110%30 Aug →
dust26–130.0617%28 Aug →
cache13–20.0916%23 Aug →
nuke6–130.0218%23 Aug →
cache13–160.0920%23 Aug →
nuke11–130.0616%23 Aug →
mirage11–130.0632%22 Aug →
inferno16–140.1321%22 Aug →
dust24–130.0113%22 Aug →
cache10–130.0218%22 Aug →
dust213–80.0526%22 Aug →
anubis9–130.1217%22 Aug →
cache13–100.0819%22 Aug →
cache13–100.0120%21 Aug →
nuke13–160.0714%21 Aug →
mirage6–130.0713%21 Aug →
cache5–130.0224%21 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0120%21 Aug →
dust213–50.1119%21 Aug →
nuke13–50.0612%21 Aug →
anubis13–80.1315%21 Aug →
cache5–130.0127%21 Aug →
mirage16–130.0520%21 Aug →
dust21–13-0.080%21 Aug →
cache8–130.0629%20 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.0420%20 Aug →
anubis13–60.0111%20 Aug →
mirage4–130.0623%20 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0411%20 Aug →
dust213–110.0616%20 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0316%19 Aug →
dust213–80.0228%19 Aug →
mirage13–50.0317%19 Aug →
dust213–110.0814%19 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.