RaNDooM

RaNDooM — CS2 Stats

76561197997016352[U:1:36750624]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,264Tracked matches36%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating14,467Blue band · top ~31.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 5 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,467 -1,179 5 Aug12 Sept · 8 days played
14,46716,132peak 16,1325 Aug12 Sept
16,387Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-08-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,665 below peak (16,132)
  • -686 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 533 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRaNDooMFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,467 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning45
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD484210Last 10048%Win rateLLLLTLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 10

  • 181 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 20

  • 5132 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility6.2
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.5
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.2

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time639ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–5 · poseidon, 8 Sept
29%Best headshot accuracy · 5–9 · debris, 8 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · vertigo, 30 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 12 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C23101343%-0.01
mirageD1741324%-0.03
infernoS1410471%-0.01
nukeD93633%-0.00
anubisD82625%-0.02
ancientS65183%-0.00
cacheS54180%0.01
vertigoS550100%0.04
overpassC52340%-0.03
office31233%-0.03
poseidon110100%0.18
debris1010%-0.03
eldorado1010%0.13
italy110100%0.14
train1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches
38%Win rate
0.64Avg K/D
59.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage617%0.6010.0
Inferno333%0.5710.7
Anubis250%0.7610.0
Overpass1100%0.436.0
Dust210%0.4312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
69.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
620msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
14.42HE damage / grenade
6.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.101% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.5303% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.1014%14 Sept
cache7–130.0821%14 Sept
dust25–13-0.0416%14 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0619%14 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0411%14 Sept
dust29–130.0611%12 Sept
dust26–130.0121%12 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0410%12 Sept
inferno13–10.0318%12 Sept
mirage10–13-0.059%12 Sept
cache13–00.1313%12 Sept
office11–130.0015%10 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0517%10 Sept
dust26–130.0113%10 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0013%10 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0817%10 Sept
vertigo13–90.0510%9 Sept
dust27–130.0214%9 Sept
poseidon9–50.1815%8 Sept
debris5–9-0.0329%8 Sept
eldorado6–90.1311%8 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0510%5 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0411%5 Sept
dust210–13-0.0120%4 Sept
overpass0–5-0.080%4 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0617%4 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0411%4 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0116%4 Sept
inferno10–2-0.035%4 Sept
cache13–5-0.0711%3 Sept
dust213–60.0625%3 Sept
nuke13–40.0812%3 Sept
office10–13-0.0611%2 Sept
office5–0-0.0211%2 Sept
inferno13–30.0417%2 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0111%2 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0114%2 Sept
vertigo2–00.010%2 Sept
nuke13–40.0418%2 Sept
italy13–80.1411%1 Sept
mirage13–60.0614%1 Sept
inferno13–80.0511%31 Aug
dust212–120.0017%31 Aug
overpass11–130.0317%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0617%30 Aug
vertigo13–20.046%30 Aug
overpass13–9-0.0616%28 Aug
nuke13–70.0225%28 Aug
vertigo13–40.0513%28 Aug
train4–13-0.0411%28 Aug
ancient13–60.0527%28 Aug
anubis11–13-0.014%28 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0221%28 Aug
cache13–1-0.0511%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.069%28 Aug
dust213–110.0716%28 Aug
dust213–3-0.0311%27 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0412%25 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0112%25 Aug
dust213–9-0.0217%25 Aug
overpass5–13-0.095%25 Aug
vertigo13–50.0411%25 Aug
inferno13–11-0.098%13 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0414%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.0417%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0310%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0422%11 Aug
mirage13–30.0310%11 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0111%10 Aug
inferno13–50.0512%10 Aug
overpass13–60.0713%10 Aug
dust212–12-0.0210%10 Aug
dust216–14-0.0512%10 Aug
ancient6–13-0.086%10 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0316%9 Aug
cache13–9-0.0316%9 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0712%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0714%8 Aug
dust22–13-0.049%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0315%8 Aug
dust213–8-0.029%8 Aug
nuke7–130.0113%8 Aug
inferno13–20.0315%8 Aug
anubis13–70.0310%7 Aug
ancient13–110.0817%7 Aug
dust213–80.028%7 Aug
mirage6–13-0.057%7 Aug
anubis13–40.046%7 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0113%7 Aug
mirage13–100.0315%7 Aug
mirage12–120.0110%6 Aug
mirage15–150.0612%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0619%6 Aug
dust213–2-0.0113%5 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0512%5 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0116%5 Aug
dust213–2-0.024%5 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0712%5 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0810%5 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0215%5 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →