Gettolasa

Gettolasa — CS2 Stats

FI76561197996064387[U:1:35798659]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,380Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,651 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,651 → 1,651
+6Tracked matches · now 2,380
0.0ppWin rate · 40.0% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 20 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,930 +402 20 Dec3 Apr · 9 days played
17,52819,415peak 19,41520 Dec3 Apr
19,415Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,651Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2025-12-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,651
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 100 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGettolasaFACEITLevel 8 · 1,651 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,651csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning52
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5149Last 10051%Win rateLWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −6.2pp headshot accuracy · +0ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility6.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.2
Utility6.8
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time550ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy14.2%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 20 Jan
32%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · inferno, 9 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 4 Aug
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 19 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
712In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 76% over 25ancientWeakest map · 33% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientD2791833%-0.00
infernoB26131350%0.00
nukeS2519676%-0.01
overpassA95456%-0.02
dust242250%-0.02
anubis3030%-0.03
mirage31233%-0.06
cache220100%-0.03
train1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,428Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
75.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno19448%0.9814.5
Ancient19146%0.9414.1
Nuke18164%1.0115.0
Overpass5654%0.9613.7
Anubis3234%0.8113.2
Mirage2040%1.0213.8
Cache1540%0.8713.1
Train1233%0.719.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.6%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
548msReaction time
23.3%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
11.25HE damage / grenade
13.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.6046% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.2979% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–16-0.048%20 Sept
nuke13–60.0210%20 Sept
dust213–80.029%18 Sept
ancient19–170.008%16 Sept
inferno11–130.0311%10 Sept
inferno8–130.0313%30 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0210%29 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0212%29 Aug
cache13–9-0.0516%29 Aug
nuke13–60.0311%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0111%24 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0123%17 Aug
ancient7–13-0.039%17 Aug
ancient13–30.0321%14 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0432%9 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0219%7 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0622%4 Aug
cache16–13-0.0219%27 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0410%21 Jul
dust27–13-0.095%18 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0517%14 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0913%7 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0417%7 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0516%7 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0320%6 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0317%6 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0415%28 Jun
inferno13–4-0.005%19 Jun
ancient11–13-0.087%14 Jun
dust213–30.0818%6 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0221%6 Jun
ancient10–130.0317%2 Jun
overpass13–10.069%19 May
ancient5–13-0.0213%16 May
ancient5–13-0.053%16 May
nuke11–13-0.0325%16 May
ancient8–13-0.0312%16 May
inferno9–13-0.0416%22 Apr
ancient9–130.0214%22 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0010%9 Apr
ancient13–100.0113%3 Apr
ancient14–16-0.048%3 Apr
inferno13–60.0411%3 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0419%3 Apr
nuke19–16-0.0411%31 Mar
inferno13–80.0216%31 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0411%29 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0215%25 Mar
nuke19–160.0115%22 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0312%22 Mar
overpass10–13-0.039%18 Mar
inferno12–16-0.0315%17 Mar
nuke11–130.017%17 Mar
ancient10–130.119%17 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0314%15 Mar
overpass13–70.0122%5 Mar
nuke13–90.0114%5 Mar
inferno13–4-0.016%5 Mar
ancient13–6-0.0212%4 Mar
nuke11–13-0.046%4 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0116%4 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0516%2 Mar
nuke13–100.0117%2 Mar
inferno13–50.008%1 Mar
ancient13–30.0417%1 Mar
ancient8–130.0216%27 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0811%19 Feb
inferno13–100.1018%19 Feb
ancient13–80.0912%19 Feb
inferno7–90.0523%19 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0316%15 Feb
ancient13–30.0615%15 Feb
inferno16–120.0518%15 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0517%15 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0612%15 Feb
overpass13–16-0.089%1 Feb
nuke13–20.0329%25 Jan
nuke13–11-0.025%25 Jan
overpass9–13-0.042%24 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0215%24 Jan
dust28–13-0.0812%24 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0313%24 Jan
ancient13–5-0.028%24 Jan
ancient6–130.018%22 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0523%20 Jan
nuke13–30.1218%20 Jan
inferno13–80.0316%14 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0530%12 Jan
nuke16–14-0.0210%12 Jan
ancient2–13-0.0122%12 Jan
inferno13–80.0625%8 Jan
overpass13–110.0113%5 Jan
ancient13–40.0425%5 Jan
nuke13–100.0215%5 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0218%4 Jan
overpass13–7-0.039%29 Dec
train6–13-0.0118%29 Dec
inferno10–13-0.029%29 Dec
inferno13–30.0913%20 Dec
nuke13–70.0211%20 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →