Mago Eskeleto

Mago Eskeleto — CS2 Stats

LC76561197995209619[U:1:34943891]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

500Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,709Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#65272 of 226409 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Aug 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 500 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 62 days played since 7 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,709 +5,142 25 Nov31 Aug · 13 days played
15,56720,709peak 20,70925 Nov31 Aug
20,709Peak Premier in tracked matches
62Days played since 2025-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,709
  • +12 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,291 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMago EskeletoFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,709 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning46
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48457Last 10048%Win rateWTWTWWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −47ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 302 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 523 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 893 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.7 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.6
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time603ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · overpass, 24 Sept
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 11 Apr
453msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · train, 22 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
128In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 6infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1910953%-0.01
dust2A1710759%-0.02
anubisC145936%-0.02
infernoD123925%0.00
cacheB115645%-0.00
trainC94544%0.02
ancientC73443%-0.02
overpassS660100%0.06
nuke42250%0.05
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

27Matches
37%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
84.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.4%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
584msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
10.69HE damage / grenade
15.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7005% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.039%27 Aug
train12–120.0210%22 Aug
nuke13–60.0512%21 Aug
inferno15–150.019%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0220%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.0529%19 Aug
dust28–13-0.0421%17 Aug
cache15–150.0418%16 Aug
cache4–13-0.084%15 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0513%15 Aug
anubis9–130.0317%13 Aug
train9–13-0.018%12 Aug
cache13–110.0324%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0413%2 Aug
dust213–40.0823%1 Aug
train8–130.0529%29 Jul
mirage10–130.0419%26 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0710%25 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0118%23 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0113%23 Jul
anubis13–11-0.049%22 Jul
dust212–12-0.0918%22 Jul
mirage13–60.0515%22 Jul
anubis13–8-0.014%22 Jul
anubis9–13-0.079%22 Jul
cache9–13-0.0017%22 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0017%20 Jul
inferno13–90.0413%17 Jul
dust213–70.0220%16 Jul
anubis1–2-0.130%15 Jul
dust29–13-0.0123%14 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0714%13 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0926%13 Jul
cache13–90.0022%13 Jul
mirage13–90.0314%13 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0718%12 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0214%12 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0310%11 Jul
cache16–120.0515%11 Jul
dust216–14-0.057%10 Jul
cache14–160.0513%10 Jul
dust213–40.0733%10 Jul
inferno13–10.0521%9 Jul
mirage12–120.0417%5 Jul
anubis13–20.099%5 Jul
cache13–6-0.0430%3 Jul
cache9–13-0.0320%3 Jul
overpass13–110.0012%24 Jun
train13–100.0412%23 Jun
train13–8-0.0111%23 Jun
anubis11–130.0015%13 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0321%13 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0921%30 May
nuke15–15-0.0519%30 May
anubis13–50.0516%28 May
anubis11–13-0.0115%28 May
anubis5–13-0.0621%28 May
inferno7–13-0.0222%28 May
ancient5–13-0.0712%23 May
inferno11–13-0.0126%17 May
cache1–12-0.1122%15 May
dust213–40.0230%13 May
dust211–13-0.0811%13 May
mirage13–7-0.0211%10 May
dust216–14-0.0118%19 Apr
inferno13–11-0.008%15 Apr
mirage13–100.0413%15 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0314%11 Apr
mirage13–20.0445%11 Apr
inferno11–130.0016%7 Apr
dust28–13-0.1230%7 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0212%5 Apr
nuke13–20.109%27 Mar
overpass13–8-0.0219%12 Mar
anubis12–12-0.0314%12 Mar
train5–13-0.0411%6 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0117%6 Mar
dust213–110.025%25 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0411%25 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0411%16 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0311%24 Dec
inferno11–130.0516%23 Dec
train13–70.0522%25 Nov
ancient13–10.0320%9 Nov
overpass13–20.0418%9 Nov
ancient2–90.0610%3 Nov
mirage3–13-0.078%3 Nov
dust210–13-0.039%3 Nov
vertigo3–13-0.0322%23 Oct
inferno0–13-0.0322%21 Oct
mirage13–20.098%3 Oct
dust213–100.0410%3 Oct
nuke8–130.1114%2 Oct
dust213–9-0.0615%2 Oct
overpass13–30.1212%25 Sept
overpass8–00.0823%25 Sept
overpass13–60.157%24 Sept
train9–13-0.038%13 Sept
train13–40.0916%13 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0910%7 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →