xsayy

xsayy — CS2 Stats

DE76561197995119077[U:1:34853349]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,637Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,549Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62436 of 259041 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,681 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,549 → 21,549
+10Tracked matches · now 1,637
+1.6ppWin rate · 51.7% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,549 -301 16 Aug – 26 Oct · 14 days played
20,74221,850peak 21,85016 Aug26 Oct
21,850Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,466Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • 785 below peak (2,466)
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 70 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 301 below peak (21,850)
  • +453 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,451 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxsayyFACEITLevel 10 · 1,681 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,549 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,466csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning64
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–41–1Last 10058%Win rateLWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +6.1pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility6.3
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.4
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time527ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 502ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 16 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 3 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 23 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 50% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2514–1156%0.01
cacheS2315–865%0.01
dust2A2112–957%-0.02
nukeS118–373%0.02
anubisB84–450%-0.01
ancientB84–450%0.00
mirage—41–325%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

775Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
81.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210957%1.0715.5
Inferno10064%1.1516.4
Cache6959%1.1716.6
Anubis6040%1.0515.8
Ancient5551%1.0715.8
Nuke4852%1.0616.0
Mirage2236%0.9616.2
Overpass2264%1.0817.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
533msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
13.66HE damage / grenade
6.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.7676% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.0121%29 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0731%29 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0518%29 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0217%29 Oct →
inferno13–60.0525%26 Oct →
nuke13–60.0522%26 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0319%23 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0317%23 Oct →
inferno10–130.0223%23 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0521%23 Oct →
cache16–140.0121%23 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0415%22 Oct →
dust213–90.0216%22 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0521%22 Oct →
ancient13–80.0117%22 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.036%21 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0227%18 Oct →
dust211–13-0.078%18 Oct →
dust213–60.029%18 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0814%16 Oct →
cache13–90.0720%16 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0319%14 Oct →
inferno13–160.0118%13 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0328%13 Oct →
ancient11–130.0117%13 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0419%10 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0323%10 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0313%8 Oct →
inferno11–130.0221%8 Oct →
dust213–110.0121%8 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0214%5 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.0223%5 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0313%5 Oct →
inferno15–150.0327%5 Oct →
cache13–50.0711%5 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0216%5 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0722%4 Oct →
inferno13–70.0220%4 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0426%4 Oct →
ancient9–130.0312%4 Oct →
anubis16–130.0120%4 Oct →
inferno13–30.0125%4 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0716%3 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0119%3 Oct →
dust25–130.0112%3 Oct →
cache13–80.0324%3 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0317%3 Oct →
anubis9–130.0727%3 Oct →
dust24–130.0541%3 Oct →
inferno13–70.0526%2 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0123%28 Sept →
cache9–130.0214%28 Sept →
inferno13–50.0313%28 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0118%28 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0521%24 Sept →
dust213–90.0216%24 Sept →
cache13–50.0014%24 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0515%22 Sept →
nuke2–130.0020%21 Sept →
cache13–80.0316%21 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0215%14 Sept →
anubis13–80.0411%13 Sept →
dust216–130.0016%13 Sept →
inferno9–130.0213%13 Sept →
dust20–13-0.1211%13 Sept →
cache13–80.0820%13 Sept →
cache11–130.0511%13 Sept →
nuke13–50.0633%12 Sept →
cache13–110.0815%12 Sept →
dust213–20.0718%12 Sept →
nuke13–100.0111%12 Sept →
ancient13–100.0426%8 Sept →
dust210–130.0028%7 Sept →
inferno13–80.0719%7 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0322%7 Sept →
cache10–130.0026%7 Sept →
nuke13–70.0120%5 Sept →
ancient16–130.0210%5 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0214%5 Sept →
cache13–40.0129%5 Sept →
nuke13–90.0221%5 Sept →
dust219–170.0016%5 Sept →
mirage16–130.0522%4 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0420%4 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0726%2 Sept →
dust213–90.0131%31 Aug →
cache13–40.0313%31 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0115%31 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0020%31 Aug →
cache13–80.0419%31 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0423%27 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0432%26 Aug →
mirage13–160.0610%23 Aug →
inferno9–70.0422%23 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0315%23 Aug →
inferno13–110.0115%22 Aug →
inferno16–130.0616%16 Aug →
nuke13–80.1014%16 Aug →
cache16–120.0413%16 Aug →
inferno13–100.0621%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.