FL

FL — CS2 Stats

FI76561197994252403[U:1:33986675]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,883Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating8.5 ElitePositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,216Top 5% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4907 of 251495 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,493 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,216 +291 2 Aug – 7 Oct · 11 days played
24,88127,216peak 27,2162 Aug7 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,493 +0 4 Sept – 22 Sept · 4 observations
2,4932,493peak 2,4934 Sept22 Sept
27,216Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,493Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,493
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 7 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,216
  • +546 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,784 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFLFACEITLevel 10 · 2,493 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,216 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,493csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning80
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–41Last 10059%Win rateWLWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −7.0pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility7.1
Positioning8.0
Opening Duels7.3
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 71% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 71% on CT to 50% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning8.0
Utility7.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels7.5
Win Impact9.4

Composite 8.5/10 (Elite), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time527ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 3 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 1 Sept →
352msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 31 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
6–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 20cacheWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2515–1060%0.04
infernoA2112–957%0.03
dust2A2011–955%0.04
ancientS2014–670%0.06
cacheC83–538%0.02
nukeS64–267%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

966Matches
56%Win rate
1.46Avg K/D
98.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9562%1.4619.6
Inferno8770%1.8421.8
Nuke6152%1.3519.3
Dust25768%1.6620.8
Mirage5353%1.3517.4
Anubis5153%1.4319.5
Overpass1471%1.6921.8
Vertigo1136%1.3522.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
526msReaction time
50.3%T opening success
71.0%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
12.66HE damage / grenade
13.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis22–180.0524%12 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0418%11 Oct →
dust213–30.1220%11 Oct →
anubis11–130.0512%11 Oct →
anubis13–110.0716%7 Oct →
nuke13–70.0719%7 Oct →
dust213–90.0320%5 Oct →
cache11–130.0116%5 Oct →
inferno11–130.0112%4 Oct →
anubis13–100.0412%29 Sept →
dust211–130.0617%29 Sept →
ancient11–130.1123%29 Sept →
anubis13–90.0522%27 Sept →
inferno13–70.0125%27 Sept →
ancient16–130.0430%27 Sept →
cache13–40.1022%26 Sept →
nuke13–80.0818%24 Sept →
cache13–100.0226%24 Sept →
ancient13–100.0922%24 Sept →
inferno16–130.0133%24 Sept →
ancient22–180.0222%22 Sept →
anubis13–40.1325%22 Sept →
ancient9–130.0118%21 Sept →
cache9–13-0.009%21 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0325%21 Sept →
cache10–130.0523%21 Sept →
anubis13–80.1420%21 Sept →
anubis13–90.1422%20 Sept →
inferno13–10.1136%20 Sept →
inferno7–130.0512%20 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0233%20 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0119%20 Sept →
anubis6–130.0124%18 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0228%18 Sept →
ancient13–90.1324%18 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0431%18 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0412%17 Sept →
ancient13–50.0925%17 Sept →
inferno13–90.0423%17 Sept →
nuke5–130.0815%16 Sept →
anubis13–70.0019%16 Sept →
ancient13–80.0413%16 Sept →
dust213–100.1027%15 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0119%15 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0324%15 Sept →
ancient16–140.0117%15 Sept →
inferno8–130.0117%15 Sept →
inferno17–190.0421%14 Sept →
anubis13–110.0226%14 Sept →
nuke11–130.0419%14 Sept →
anubis13–90.0611%13 Sept →
inferno13–80.1118%13 Sept →
dust213–80.0514%13 Sept →
ancient11–130.0128%13 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0239%10 Sept →
ancient13–100.0729%10 Sept →
nuke13–60.0527%10 Sept →
inferno13–60.0213%8 Sept →
inferno10–130.0434%8 Sept →
ancient16–140.1022%8 Sept →
dust213–70.0529%8 Sept →
inferno13–90.0515%6 Sept →
ancient19–160.0727%6 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0128%6 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0216%6 Sept →
dust216–120.1226%3 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0125%3 Sept →
ancient13–50.1433%3 Sept →
anubis6–130.0629%3 Sept →
ancient13–90.0319%2 Sept →
anubis16–130.0619%2 Sept →
ancient13–40.1215%2 Sept →
ancient13–110.0921%1 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0014%1 Sept →
dust211–130.0940%1 Sept →
anubis13–90.0521%1 Sept →
inferno13–20.1126%31 Aug →
inferno13–80.0320%31 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.059%31 Aug →
inferno11–130.0322%30 Aug →
dust29–130.0318%30 Aug →
dust213–40.0216%30 Aug →
anubis17–190.0320%27 Aug →
inferno13–60.0414%27 Aug →
dust213–80.0715%27 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0319%27 Aug →
ancient8–130.0523%11 Aug →
dust213–50.0220%11 Aug →
anubis13–50.0518%11 Aug →
dust28–130.0625%8 Aug →
inferno11–130.0330%8 Aug →
dust213–40.0522%8 Aug →
inferno10–130.0121%7 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0015%7 Aug →
anubis13–50.0614%2 Aug →
cache13–3-0.008%2 Aug →
nuke13–20.089%2 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0116%2 Aug →
dust213–40.0932%2 Aug →
cache14–160.0520%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.