Lystr1x

Lystr1x — CS2 Stats

RU76561197992521739[U:1:32256011]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,928Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,654 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,654 → 1,654
+11Tracked matches · now 1,928
−6.7ppWin rate · 50.0% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 29 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,882 -1,413 30 May21 Jun · 5 days played
22,88224,295peak 24,29530 May21 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,654 +0 3 Sept11 Sept · 3 observations
1,6541,654peak 1,6543 Sept11 Sept
24,434Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,654Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-05-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,654
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 97 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLystr1xFACEITLevel 10 · 1,654 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,654csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning59
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5149Last 10051%Win rateLWLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.1
Utility5.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch5.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.9
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time541ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 7 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 13 Jun
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 1 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 100% over 5anubisWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2012860%0.00
anubisC156940%0.00
dust2C146843%-0.01
cacheB147750%0.01
infernoB115645%0.01
mirageC94544%-0.01
overpassA74357%0.02
nukeC52340%0.01
vertigoS550100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

732Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
92.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29944%1.0918.4
Ancient8660%1.1518.1
Mirage8345%0.9816.4
Anubis5252%1.0117.1
Inferno4848%0.9715.9
Overpass3661%1.0716.1
Nuke3148%0.9915.7
Cache2446%1.1919.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
537msReaction time
40.9%T opening success
58.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
12.32HE damage / grenade
3.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4968 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0222%13 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0217%13 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0521%13 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0819%13 Sept
inferno13–60.1027%13 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0010%12 Sept
dust213–70.0826%4 Sept
dust21–10-0.0714%4 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0617%1 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0010%30 Aug
dust216–140.0722%30 Aug
cache1–13-0.084%30 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0322%30 Aug
cache13–30.0119%30 Aug
anubis13–90.058%30 Aug
anubis9–130.0111%29 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0435%29 Aug
ancient13–100.0119%23 Aug
dust210–13-0.0320%23 Aug
ancient13–80.0519%23 Aug
cache6–130.0411%23 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0316%23 Aug
dust28–13-0.0424%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0121%22 Aug
mirage6–130.0021%22 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0215%22 Aug
inferno5–130.0437%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0417%22 Aug
vertigo13–100.0528%22 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0526%19 Aug
inferno13–60.0825%18 Aug
anubis13–40.1018%18 Aug
ancient6–130.0223%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0528%15 Aug
vertigo13–20.0319%15 Aug
cache11–130.0019%14 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0213%14 Aug
dust213–80.0632%14 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0016%14 Aug
vertigo13–80.0611%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.0420%14 Aug
cache13–8-0.0731%9 Aug
anubis9–13-0.028%9 Aug
ancient13–90.0021%9 Aug
cache6–130.0119%9 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0517%9 Aug
ancient22–190.0520%8 Aug
dust213–7-0.0517%7 Aug
ancient13–10.1121%7 Aug
cache13–80.0819%7 Aug
dust219–16-0.0317%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0721%6 Aug
nuke11–130.0126%6 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0123%6 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0016%6 Aug
cache9–130.0120%6 Aug
ancient13–60.0519%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.0321%2 Aug
ancient11–130.0416%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0120%1 Aug
cache13–100.0216%1 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0314%1 Aug
cache13–110.0715%11 Jul
overpass0–6-0.0522%21 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0914%13 Jun
ancient13–90.0328%13 Jun
overpass13–60.0511%13 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0614%13 Jun
dust213–100.0038%13 Jun
dust26–13-0.0417%8 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0615%8 Jun
overpass8–130.0125%6 Jun
dust28–130.0119%6 Jun
anubis13–110.1027%6 Jun
cache7–13-0.0317%6 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0522%6 Jun
inferno16–120.0318%6 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0521%6 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0714%6 Jun
cache13–80.0713%5 Jun
nuke13–80.0819%5 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0626%5 Jun
inferno13–50.0518%5 Jun
ancient13–90.0120%5 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0519%5 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0817%5 Jun
anubis12–16-0.0114%4 Jun
overpass13–90.0214%4 Jun
dust26–13-0.0426%3 Jun
overpass13–110.0216%3 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0612%31 May
mirage13–110.0316%31 May
anubis7–13-0.0212%31 May
mirage10–13-0.0319%30 May
overpass13–70.0926%30 May
ancient13–110.0426%30 May
nuke13–40.039%30 May
overpass13–160.0315%30 May
cache13–110.0519%29 May
cache8–13-0.0123%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →