♔ Sandmann ♔

♔ Sandmann ♔ — CS2 Stats

DE76561197991008198[U:1:30742470]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

835Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,407Purple band · top ~22.8% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,407 +747 11 Sept – 1 Oct · 18 days played
14,05817,533peak 17,53311 Sept1 Oct
17,650Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,126 below peak (17,533)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,593 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♔ Sandmann ♔PREMIER16,407 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning58
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateLLWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +159ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility5.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 67% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning5.8
Utility5.7
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time566ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−5.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 23 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 22 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 14 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2210–1245%0.04
infernoD216–1529%0.00
nukeA2011–955%0.02
mirageC156–940%0.01
cacheA117–464%-0.01
anubisD82–625%0.02
ancient—31–233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
66.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
572msReaction time
66.6%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
10.74HE damage / grenade
6.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0121%1 Oct →
anubis9–130.0319%1 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0121%30 Sept →
dust213–90.0324%30 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0111%30 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0614%29 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0512%28 Sept →
nuke13–80.1122%28 Sept →
mirage13–00.0120%28 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0111%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0418%27 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0214%27 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0033%27 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0211%27 Sept →
mirage11–130.0218%27 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0917%27 Sept →
nuke13–70.0514%27 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0614%26 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0016%26 Sept →
nuke13–60.0427%26 Sept →
cache16–12-0.0117%26 Sept →
nuke13–50.0215%26 Sept →
mirage10–130.0516%26 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0619%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0421%26 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0619%26 Sept →
cache9–13-0.058%26 Sept →
anubis16–140.0718%26 Sept →
dust211–130.0634%26 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0428%25 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.094%25 Sept →
inferno13–60.028%25 Sept →
nuke13–110.0213%25 Sept →
mirage8–130.0323%25 Sept →
nuke13–40.1018%25 Sept →
inferno7–90.0327%25 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0124%25 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0826%25 Sept →
inferno8–130.0626%25 Sept →
dust28–130.1029%24 Sept →
nuke13–50.0517%24 Sept →
dust216–120.0919%24 Sept →
dust212–160.0321%24 Sept →
cache13–30.0117%24 Sept →
nuke16–130.1115%24 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0630%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.0321%23 Sept →
mirage13–80.0621%23 Sept →
inferno6–130.0331%23 Sept →
cache5–13-0.119%23 Sept →
dust213–50.1222%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0736%23 Sept →
cache13–50.0419%23 Sept →
dust24–130.0129%22 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0619%22 Sept →
cache13–50.1042%22 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0021%22 Sept →
cache5–130.0820%22 Sept →
mirage10–130.0823%22 Sept →
dust213–50.1224%20 Sept →
nuke12–160.0119%20 Sept →
dust213–30.0429%20 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0216%20 Sept →
dust215–150.0316%20 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0211%20 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0220%19 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0423%19 Sept →
anubis13–160.0424%19 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0218%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0117%19 Sept →
dust211–130.0427%19 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0419%19 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0119%18 Sept →
mirage13–80.0218%18 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0125%18 Sept →
mirage14–160.0222%18 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0220%18 Sept →
nuke13–40.1020%18 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0641%18 Sept →
inferno13–100.0815%17 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0219%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0118%17 Sept →
dust213–90.0629%17 Sept →
anubis15–150.0417%16 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0017%16 Sept →
inferno15–150.0223%15 Sept →
dust25–130.0221%15 Sept →
dust213–70.0828%15 Sept →
anubis8–130.0415%14 Sept →
inferno5–130.0528%14 Sept →
dust213–50.0320%14 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0020%14 Sept →
mirage11–130.0531%13 Sept →
dust27–130.0030%13 Sept →
inferno8–130.0723%13 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0329%13 Sept →
nuke14–160.0012%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0138%11 Sept →
dust24–130.0125%11 Sept →
nuke12–120.0124%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.