IceBerg

IceBerg — CS2 Stats

PROjaNNIkXeqtR :)BBL EsportsDenmarkIGLSettings & gear profile →

76561197991000831[U:1:30735103]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,531Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,242 → 3,242
+1Tracked matches · now 3,531
+3.3ppWin rate · 43.3% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 5 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,242 +0 28 Aug18 Sept · 8 observations
3,2423,242peak 3,24228 Aug18 Sept
3,242Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-04-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,242
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 258 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIceBergPEAK ELO3,242csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning41
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateWLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 482ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.5
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.1
Utility6.5
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time473ms−88ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 473ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 9 Sept
52%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · inferno, 25 Jul
344msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 10 Sept
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 24overpassWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2416867%-0.01
mirageA1911858%-0.03
ancientC167944%-0.04
infernoB157847%-0.01
overpassC125742%-0.02
anubisB84450%-0.03
cacheB63350%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,177Matches
59%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
76.8ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
49Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke27666%1.0314.9
Ancient27456%1.0716.0
Mirage24652%0.9815.2
Inferno10661%1.0414.4
Train9461%1.0116.6
Overpass8963%1.0815.6
Anubis8045%0.9615.0
Vertigo6462%1.0215.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$797Inventory value81ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ M9 Bayonet | Rust Coat (Battle-Scarred)$520★ Driver Gloves | King Snake (Field-Tested)$210Galil AR | Eco (Well-Worn)$16Dual Berettas | Melondrama (Minimal Wear)$11AWP | Exoskeleton (Field-Tested)$6Glock-18 | Vogue (Field-Tested)$6

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
484msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
29.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
7.55HE damage / grenade
9.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1251% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0220%18 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0411%13 Sept
cache7–13-0.0824%13 Sept
inferno16–12-0.0239%12 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0316%12 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0512%10 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0520%10 Sept
nuke13–50.0729%9 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0335%9 Sept
ancient12–3-0.0422%9 Sept
ancient1–3-0.020%9 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0832%6 Sept
nuke3–13-0.1238%6 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0218%6 Sept
inferno13–90.0113%5 Sept
cache11–13-0.0012%5 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0728%5 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0222%31 Aug
inferno13–160.0323%31 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0432%24 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0623%9 Aug
nuke13–100.0013%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0621%9 Aug
cache13–50.0424%8 Aug
nuke8–130.0019%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0524%8 Aug
cache13–20.0220%7 Aug
nuke13–10.0523%7 Aug
cache6–13-0.0433%30 Jul
cache13–9-0.0020%30 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0752%25 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0817%25 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0226%24 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0012%24 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0223%23 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0322%23 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0423%22 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0128%22 Jul
anubis13–90.0125%19 Jul
nuke13–80.0223%19 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0017%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0030%28 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0222%28 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0321%27 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0623%27 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0620%27 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0419%25 Jun
mirage13–100.0118%25 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0210%25 Jun
nuke13–9-0.039%24 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0221%24 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0414%23 Jun
overpass13–50.0413%23 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0252%21 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0126%21 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0014%20 Jun
overpass13–4-0.0227%20 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0524%20 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0328%18 Jun
overpass13–16-0.0214%18 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0313%18 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0724%3 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0515%3 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0113%30 May
mirage1–5-0.0325%29 May
nuke13–10-0.0026%29 May
mirage16–9-0.058%29 May
ancient10–13-0.0726%28 May
mirage8–13-0.0418%21 May
inferno5–13-0.0926%21 May
ancient13–8-0.0621%21 May
nuke13–11-0.0428%20 May
inferno13–80.0517%20 May
ancient8–13-0.0817%20 May
mirage13–8-0.0515%18 May
inferno13–30.0022%18 May
overpass13–8-0.0134%13 May
mirage13–70.0442%13 May
overpass13–9-0.0116%10 May
mirage13–8-0.0112%10 May
nuke13–8-0.0226%9 May
inferno13–90.0323%9 May
overpass3–13-0.0123%7 May
inferno6–13-0.0323%7 May
overpass6–13-0.0436%30 Apr
mirage5–130.0231%30 Apr
nuke11–130.0529%28 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0123%28 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0333%24 Apr
nuke22–20-0.0623%24 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0127%23 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0122%23 Apr
mirage13–90.049%20 Apr
ancient13–100.0326%20 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0515%20 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0319%14 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0325%13 Apr
inferno13–90.0110%9 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0231%9 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0123%5 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →