blesa — CS2 Stats

76561197990609267[U:1:30343539]

3,671Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,270Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3369 of 28392 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,187 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning62

Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWLLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression7.1

Utility7.7

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning6.2

Utility7.7

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time574ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms

Headshot accuracy21.4%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — vertigo 9–4

13–0Biggest win — anubis

10Longest win streak

3–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 72% over 18mirageWeakest map · 18% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	18	13–5	72%	0.03
nuke	C	18	8–10	44%	0.03
dust2	B	17	8–9	47%	0.04
cache	D	15	5–10	33%	0.03
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	0.04
mirage	D	11	2–9	18%	0.03
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	0.05
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.24

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,449Matches

53%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

86.4ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	147	57%	1.33	18.8
Inferno	133	58%	1.39	19.2
Nuke	102	65%	1.44	18.4
Ancient	96	52%	1.25	18.4
Anubis	84	51%	1.25	18.4
Mirage	76	50%	1.24	17.1
Overpass	54	50%	1.49	18.5
Train	27	63%	1.56	20.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.5%Spray accuracy

80.7%Counter-strafing

11.6°Preaim

571msReaction time

33.7%T opening success

49.1%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

19.0%Flash assists

7.31HE damage / grenade

15.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.7117% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–8	0.02	18%	26 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.08	20%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.00	31%	23 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.07	7%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.20	30%	19 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.00	15%	19 Aug →
nuke	10–1	0.06	22%	19 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.00	36%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	22%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	24%	18 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	15%	16 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.05	25%	16 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	15%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	10%	16 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	27%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.09	14%	16 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.00	26%	16 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.08	16%	16 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.01	10%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.08	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	19%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.04	44%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	19%	14 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	15%	14 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.01	12%	14 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	37%	14 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.04	13%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.09	29%	13 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.09	20%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.03	17%	12 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	29%	12 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.03	28%	12 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.09	27%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–0	0.11	16%	12 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	30%	7 Aug →
ancient	11–3	0.06	19%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	13%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.16	28%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	28%	7 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	11%	6 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.02	5%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.09	27%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.02	28%	6 Aug →
inferno	6–2	-0.04	27%	6 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	19%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.06	20%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.05	30%	5 Aug →
dust2	11–9	0.12	24%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.09	16%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.08	15%	3 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.11	26%	3 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.02	8%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.09	34%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–1	0.07	29%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.04	20%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	25%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	3–0	0.23	27%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.04	16%	28 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.05	14%	28 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	10%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	26%	27 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	24%	27 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	30%	26 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.06	20%	23 Jul →
nuke	4–9	0.05	33%	23 Jul →
inferno	9–7	0.12	17%	23 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.10	32%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.07	16%	22 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.03	18%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.05	14%	13 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	17%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.08	17%	6 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	5%	6 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	19%	3 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.00	27%	3 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.04	11%	30 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.05	9%	29 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.04	22%	29 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.13	20%	29 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.03	26%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.10	35%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.08	24%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.04	28%	24 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	16%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.08	23%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.01	19%	24 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	29%	23 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	9%	23 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.05	25%	23 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.05	20%	23 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	19%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.03	16%	17 Jun →
poseidon	8–8	0.01	11%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.09	25%	16 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	25%	16 Jun →
dust2	2–13	0.01	21%	16 Jun →
vertigo	9–4	0.24	16%	16 Jun →
inferno	3–9	-0.00	31%	16 Jun →