PORMESTARI

PORMESTARI — CS2 Stats

76561197990560996[U:1:30295268]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,569Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,182Purple band · top ~23.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,554 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,569 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 1 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,182 +1,271 1 Aug19 Sept · 24 days played
14,60218,847peak 18,8471 Aug19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,554 +0 10 Sept19 Sept · 3 observations
1,5541,554peak 1,55410 Sept19 Sept
18,847Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,554Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-08-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,554
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 197 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,665 below peak (18,847)
  • -2,665 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,818 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPORMESTARIFACEITLevel 6 · 1,554 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,182 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,554csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning53
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateLLWWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.3
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time501ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 501ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 14–16 · inferno, 1 Aug
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · mirage, 1 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 9 Sept
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 1 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 54% over 28infernoWeakest map · 21% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%0.03
infernoD1941521%0.01
nukeB168850%0.01
ancientC1661038%0.00
dust2B105550%-0.00
cacheB63350%0.01
anubis330100%0.02
vertigo110100%-0.02
overpass110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

590Matches
50%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
85.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12253%1.2316.5
Inferno9561%1.3116.5
Nuke9453%1.2817.4
Mirage8251%1.1917.0
Anubis5040%1.1215.3
Vertigo2138%1.0216.5
Dust21932%1.1114.5
Overpass60%1.0617.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
501msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
9.49HE damage / grenade
9.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.0953% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–130.0422%18 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0227%18 Sept
mirage16–140.039%17 Sept
ancient16–140.1119%17 Sept
nuke3–130.0313%15 Sept
nuke13–60.1214%15 Sept
dust213–10-0.0311%15 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0319%14 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0719%14 Sept
mirage8–130.0716%13 Sept
ancient9–130.0014%13 Sept
inferno9–13-0.067%12 Sept
mirage16–130.0326%11 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0113%9 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0112%9 Sept
inferno9–130.0517%8 Sept
cache13–110.0417%7 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0229%7 Sept
overpass13–80.0515%7 Sept
mirage13–160.0919%6 Sept
ancient7–130.023%6 Sept
nuke13–90.0219%6 Sept
inferno14–160.0416%5 Sept
mirage13–90.0520%5 Sept
inferno11–130.0520%4 Sept
nuke13–30.0318%4 Sept
ancient10–130.0115%3 Sept
mirage7–130.0115%3 Sept
cache10–13-0.0414%3 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0421%2 Sept
ancient11–130.0920%1 Sept
nuke13–110.0110%1 Sept
dust29–13-0.0410%1 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0116%1 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0213%31 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0220%31 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0420%31 Aug
nuke15–150.0213%30 Aug
ancient16–130.0611%30 Aug
inferno9–00.0231%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0118%30 Aug
dust214–160.0322%29 Aug
anubis16–130.0421%29 Aug
mirage15–150.0421%29 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0619%28 Aug
inferno1–13-0.075%28 Aug
nuke2–130.0035%28 Aug
mirage8–13-0.098%28 Aug
mirage13–90.0336%28 Aug
inferno11–130.0630%28 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0413%28 Aug
inferno15–190.0921%23 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0813%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0112%23 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0614%23 Aug
mirage13–90.0219%22 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0222%22 Aug
mirage13–70.0928%22 Aug
inferno13–50.0613%22 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0118%22 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0117%19 Aug
dust213–40.0729%19 Aug
nuke13–80.0414%19 Aug
ancient13–30.0222%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0320%19 Aug
inferno13–90.1015%18 Aug
dust216–140.0819%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0618%16 Aug
mirage13–40.0816%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.076%16 Aug
anubis13–110.0110%16 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0530%16 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0341%16 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0417%15 Aug
dust210–13-0.0714%15 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0118%15 Aug
cache8–130.0235%15 Aug
mirage13–30.0533%13 Aug
dust213–70.0532%12 Aug
cache16–120.0217%12 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0211%12 Aug
cache2–13-0.0324%6 Aug
mirage5–130.0920%6 Aug
dust212–16-0.0822%5 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0132%5 Aug
mirage13–60.1521%4 Aug
dust213–90.059%4 Aug
ancient16–140.0417%4 Aug
cache13–100.0714%3 Aug
anubis13–100.027%3 Aug
nuke15–150.0412%3 Aug
mirage10–130.0416%2 Aug
mirage13–90.0229%2 Aug
mirage16–140.0118%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0215%2 Aug
mirage10–130.069%2 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0121%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0542%1 Aug
inferno14–160.1735%1 Aug
nuke13–10.0114%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →