EMPTYANER — CS2 Stats

LI76561197990362685[U:1:30096957]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,334Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating16,367Purple band · top ~23% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim97

Positioning73

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateWLLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.7

Aggression10.0

Utility5.3

Positioning7.3

Opening Duels7.0

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 97 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.7

Positioning7.3

Utility5.3

Mechanics9.1

Opening Duels7.0

Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time534ms−83ms

first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms

Headshot accuracy39.6%+4.2%

first ⅓ avg 35.4% → last ⅓ avg 39.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 9–13

13–0Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	36	22–14	61%	0.04
inferno	A	17	10–7	59%	0.02
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	0.01
mirage	C	12	5–7	42%	0.03
nuke	D	8	2–6	25%	0.01
cache	S	7	5–2	71%	0.01
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.00
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,078Matches

50%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

79.8ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	317	54%	1.20	17.5
Anubis	251	51%	1.16	17.0
Ancient	225	48%	1.09	16.4
Inferno	157	43%	1.05	15.8
Mirage	142	44%	1.10	16.7
Nuke	60	57%	1.02	16.2
Vertigo	22	36%	1.25	18.6
Overpass	12	67%	1.06	15.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

39.6%Headshot accuracy

35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.4%Spray accuracy

90.8%Counter-strafing

6.4°Preaim

533msReaction time

52.1%T opening success

63.9%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

10.44HE damage / grenade

9.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4508 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–11	0.06	39%	28 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.18	50%	28 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	40%	27 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.09	36%	27 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.04	47%	27 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	34%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.11	29%	24 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.09	56%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	35%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.00	28%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	40%	23 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.00	35%	23 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.02	38%	23 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.05	40%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	28%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	40%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	33%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	47%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.11	53%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	54%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.00	19%	20 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.08	32%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.15	52%	20 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	35%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	41%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.06	36%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–0	-0.01	35%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.09	52%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.08	48%	13 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	36%	12 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	43%	12 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.02	46%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	30%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.07	45%	11 Aug →
inferno	5–0	-0.04	33%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–0	-0.00	29%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.06	32%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–3	-0.01	44%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	75%	10 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.02	77%	9 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.00	27%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	35%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	29%	8 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	44%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.10	41%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.08	33%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.10	47%	5 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	55%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.11	32%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.10	31%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.04	50%	5 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	50%	4 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.00	39%	4 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.02	50%	4 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	35%	4 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	52%	4 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.02	48%	4 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	13%	4 Aug →
inferno	3–6	-0.08	40%	4 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.02	25%	28 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	48%	27 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.04	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	36%	26 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	47%	26 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	22%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.10	58%	26 Jul →
inferno	9–2	0.12	52%	26 Jul →
poseidon	6–9	-0.04	31%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.07	36%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.05	50%	24 Jul →
anubis	12–12	-0.03	50%	24 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.04	30%	23 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.10	40%	23 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	35%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	53%	22 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	38%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.01	28%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	36%	20 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	46%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	38%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.09	39%	18 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.04	20%	18 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	48%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.07	23%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.09	31%	16 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	33%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.02	33%	16 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	35%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.00	38%	16 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	26%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.12	22%	16 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	41%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	52%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.05	35%	15 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	48%	15 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	39%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.07	15%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.05	37%	15 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	25%	14 Jul →