lprc. — CS2 Stats

76561197988749871[U:1:28484143]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,116Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning53

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateLLLWWLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression6.9

Utility4.8

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning5.3

Utility4.8

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time631ms−1ms

first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–2Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

L3Current streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 45% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	22	12–10	55%	0.03
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.00
inferno	A	18	10–8	56%	0.02
anubis	B	15	7–8	47%	0.00
ancient	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.01
nuke	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.00
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	0.04
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,311Matches

50%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

80.2ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	147	47%	1.04	16.0
Inferno	102	64%	1.25	16.9
Ancient	100	52%	1.16	16.0
Dust2	95	46%	1.04	15.9
Anubis	82	44%	1.00	15.9
Nuke	15	33%	0.95	15.0
Vertigo	12	42%	0.83	13.7
Overpass	5	40%	0.85	12.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy

34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.0%Spray accuracy

80.6%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

630msReaction time

32.9%T opening success

46.9%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

9.28HE damage / grenade

8.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.9397% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	16–19	-0.03	20%	29 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	16%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	16%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	13%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.00	26%	25 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	23%	24 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	30%	23 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.03	34%	23 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	20%	23 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	12%	23 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	27%	22 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	13%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.05	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	28%	22 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.04	16%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.00	20%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.07	25%	26 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.01	13%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.05	17%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.08	21%	26 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	33%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	22%	25 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.05	18%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.14	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	9%	25 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.00	18%	5 Apr →
inferno	13–3	-0.05	26%	2 Mar →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	23%	28 Feb →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	20%	27 Feb →
inferno	13–4	0.09	22%	27 Feb →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	19%	27 Feb →
dust2	11–13	0.02	25%	25 Feb →
dust2	13–3	0.06	25%	25 Feb →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	35%	25 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.01	15%	25 Feb →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	32%	25 Feb →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	35%	25 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.07	19%	15 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.01	20%	15 Feb →
dust2	13–4	0.10	17%	15 Feb →
ancient	13–7	0.01	27%	15 Feb →
inferno	14–16	0.01	22%	9 Feb →
nuke	13–3	0.04	22%	7 Feb →
inferno	13–2	0.03	11%	7 Feb →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	24%	5 Feb →
dust2	13–8	0.02	26%	5 Feb →
train	13–2	0.09	35%	5 Feb →
italy	13–6	0.06	19%	5 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	24%	4 Feb →
mirage	13–8	0.04	20%	1 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.01	20%	29 Jan →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	28%	28 Jan →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	18%	27 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	10%	27 Jan →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	33%	25 Jan →
anubis	13–16	-0.06	23%	23 Jan →
office	13–7	0.05	21%	21 Jan →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	17%	21 Jan →
anubis	13–5	0.03	18%	21 Jan →
ancient	13–6	0.05	20%	21 Jan →
inferno	11–13	0.06	36%	19 Jan →
dust2	13–10	0.11	28%	19 Jan →
dust2	13–2	0.12	23%	19 Jan →
ancient	13–5	0.02	22%	19 Jan →
ancient	16–14	-0.06	36%	17 Jan →
anubis	16–13	-0.03	18%	17 Jan →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	19%	17 Jan →
anubis	13–9	0.05	23%	17 Jan →
overpass	13–6	0.03	19%	15 Jan →
dust2	10–13	0.07	20%	14 Jan →
vertigo	7–13	0.06	25%	14 Jan →
ancient	13–10	0.02	30%	14 Jan →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	22%	13 Jan →
anubis	7–13	0.02	23%	12 Jan →
dust2	9–13	0.06	28%	10 Jan →
vertigo	13–16	0.02	29%	10 Jan →
ancient	13–10	0.00	12%	10 Jan →
mirage	13–9	0.03	22%	9 Jan →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	23%	8 Jan →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	31%	8 Jan →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	20%	8 Jan →
dust2	13–9	0.03	27%	7 Jan →
inferno	13–9	0.08	23%	6 Jan →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	15%	5 Jan →
anubis	10–13	0.06	22%	5 Jan →
inferno	13–9	0.03	18%	5 Jan →
ancient	13–5	0.04	25%	4 Jan →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	23%	3 Jan →
inferno	13–11	0.03	31%	2 Jan →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	19%	2 Jan →
mirage	13–16	0.01	18%	30 Dec →
inferno	13–7	0.05	21%	30 Dec →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	16%	30 Dec →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	20%	29 Dec →
anubis	19–15	0.02	28%	28 Dec →
anubis	16–14	0.03	18%	21 Dec →
inferno	13–2	0.09	45%	21 Dec →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	16%	21 Dec →
dust2	3–13	0.00	35%	21 Dec →