Bajas

Bajas — CS2 Stats

76561197988248027[U:1:27982299]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,610Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,063 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,610 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 30 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,063 +0 12 Sept15 Sept · 3 observations
2,0632,063peak 2,06312 Sept15 Sept
2,063Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-03-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,063
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 437 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-12
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-12

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBajasFACEITLevel 9 · 2,063 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,063csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning48
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6238Last 10062%Win rateWWLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility6.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.8
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time577ms+22ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy25.5%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.05Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 16 Apr
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 8 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · anubis, 29 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1014In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
22Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 78% over 18nukeWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2619773%-0.02
anubisS2416867%-0.02
cacheC2191243%-0.02
dust2S1814478%-0.02
nukeC52340%-0.04
inferno32167%-0.00
mirage2020%-0.06
vertigo1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,221Matches
51%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
65.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis21455%0.8313.3
Ancient21459%0.8212.9
Dust216255%0.8513.4
Inferno10948%0.7211.5
Mirage7238%0.8013.0
Nuke6840%0.7011.6
Vertigo5145%0.7412.9
Cache3139%0.7712.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
570msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
9.78HE damage / grenade
12.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.7533% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–7-0.0218%9 Sept
dust213–6-0.0830%9 Sept
cache14–16-0.0027%2 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0527%29 Aug
cache11–13-0.0213%29 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0428%29 Aug
cache13–8-0.0037%28 Aug
cache7–13-0.0320%28 Aug
ancient9–130.0138%28 Aug
dust213–60.0430%28 Aug
dust211–130.0122%28 Aug
dust213–20.0121%26 Aug
cache16–14-0.0116%25 Aug
ancient13–40.0425%23 Aug
cache13–10-0.0840%10 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0521%10 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0224%10 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0817%9 Aug
cache13–60.0221%9 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0415%9 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0344%8 Aug
cache13–70.0227%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0214%8 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0729%8 Aug
ancient15–19-0.0526%7 Aug
anubis19–150.0334%7 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0022%6 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0813%6 Aug
cache14–16-0.0121%5 Aug
cache9–130.0243%5 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0725%4 Aug
inferno13–10.0230%25 Jul
anubis13–50.0222%25 Jul
ancient13–10-0.037%23 Jul
dust211–13-0.0433%23 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0514%23 Jul
cache11–13-0.0617%23 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0622%22 Jul
ancient16–140.008%22 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0510%7 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0117%7 Jul
dust211–13-0.0738%7 Jul
ancient13–10.0430%7 Jul
cache7–13-0.0021%29 Jun
ancient13–8-0.029%29 Jun
dust213–10-0.0119%29 Jun
dust213–60.0038%28 Jun
anubis13–90.0224%28 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0314%25 Jun
ancient19–17-0.0523%25 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0327%24 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0113%24 Jun
cache10–130.0124%15 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0617%15 Jun
dust27–13-0.0710%12 Jun
dust213–10-0.0516%1 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0319%30 May
ancient16–13-0.0318%30 May
ancient9–13-0.0427%26 May
dust213–80.0023%14 May
mirage13–16-0.0527%14 May
dust213–10-0.0527%14 May
nuke2–13-0.0621%14 May
dust213–3-0.1033%13 May
nuke5–130.0018%10 May
dust213–10-0.0728%9 May
ancient19–17-0.0214%9 May
cache13–6-0.0119%9 May
ancient8–13-0.0413%3 May
anubis13–11-0.0124%3 May
cache14–16-0.0432%3 May
cache13–10-0.0118%30 Apr
anubis13–60.0133%30 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0017%30 Apr
dust213–50.0130%30 Apr
cache16–19-0.0422%30 Apr
cache10–13-0.0234%28 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0124%26 Apr
anubis20–22-0.0014%26 Apr
cache10–13-0.0814%24 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0022%24 Apr
cache16–13-0.0320%24 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0338%23 Apr
dust213–80.0223%23 Apr
ancient0–50.000%23 Apr
ancient19–16-0.0115%19 Apr
anubis17–19-0.0720%19 Apr
ancient13–90.0119%19 Apr
inferno13–70.0517%16 Apr
dust219–15-0.0415%16 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0026%15 Apr
dust213–50.0240%15 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0325%15 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0429%15 Apr
anubis13–2-0.0023%12 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0218%12 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0223%12 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0218%8 Apr
mirage17–19-0.0620%30 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0324%30 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →