LMH

LMH — CS2 Stats

76561197987708380[U:1:27442652]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,291Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating6,900Light Blue band · top ~69.7% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,900 -2,343 30 Sept – 27 Oct · 19 days played
5,4729,833peak 9,83330 Sept27 Oct
9,833Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-09-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,933 below peak (9,833)
  • -2,343 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 3,100 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLMHPREMIER6,900 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning56
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–53–1Last 10046%Win rateLLWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility7.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.1

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.6
Utility7.4
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time577ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 17 Oct →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · mirage, 5 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 9 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 23 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
3–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C218–1338%-0.01
mirageB189–950%-0.04
infernoC177–1041%-0.01
nukeB168–850%0.02
anubisC114–736%0.01
cacheC94–544%-0.01
ancientS86–275%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
576msReaction time
59.6%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
11.44HE damage / grenade
13.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0115%27 Oct →
dust214–160.0430%26 Oct →
ancient13–50.0411%26 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0717%26 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0324%26 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0435%25 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0238%25 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0525%25 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0621%24 Oct →
nuke13–80.079%24 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0319%23 Oct →
inferno13–90.0717%23 Oct →
cache13–20.038%23 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0230%23 Oct →
nuke13–80.0220%20 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0419%20 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0127%20 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0129%20 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0324%20 Oct →
nuke6–130.0225%20 Oct →
dust213–60.0116%20 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0325%18 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0022%18 Oct →
inferno13–90.0413%18 Oct →
cache13–6-0.1023%18 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0215%18 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0128%18 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0520%18 Oct →
ancient13–100.0418%17 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.047%17 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0714%17 Oct →
anubis13–90.1335%17 Oct →
inferno11–130.0024%17 Oct →
nuke11–130.0436%17 Oct →
dust29–130.0237%16 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0916%16 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0740%16 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0218%16 Oct →
cache13–100.0124%16 Oct →
mirage13–40.0140%10 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0722%10 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.1125%10 Oct →
dust29–130.0620%10 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0116%10 Oct →
dust213–100.0033%10 Oct →
dust213–60.0224%10 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0216%10 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0425%10 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0712%9 Oct →
anubis13–70.0322%9 Oct →
cache13–50.0718%9 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0317%9 Oct →
anubis13–50.0328%9 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0714%9 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0618%9 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.1116%9 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0528%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0311%9 Oct →
nuke10–130.0127%8 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0228%8 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0629%8 Oct →
mirage13–30.0635%8 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0418%8 Oct →
ancient13–50.0311%8 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0215%7 Oct →
anubis9–130.0119%7 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.009%7 Oct →
mirage11–130.0027%7 Oct →
cache5–130.0129%5 Oct →
dust27–130.0219%5 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0555%5 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0821%5 Oct →
nuke13–90.0622%5 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0320%5 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0920%4 Oct →
inferno16–140.0018%4 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0620%4 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0731%4 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0326%4 Oct →
ancient13–50.0123%4 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0131%4 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0435%4 Oct →
nuke9–130.0045%3 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0815%3 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0317%3 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0233%3 Oct →
nuke13–90.0245%3 Oct →
dust213–100.0552%3 Oct →
cache5–130.0525%3 Oct →
cache0–10-0.010%3 Oct →
inferno5–130.0112%3 Oct →
anubis8–130.0812%3 Oct →
dust28–130.0138%3 Oct →
anubis13–110.0719%2 Oct →
nuke13–60.1022%2 Oct →
inferno13–100.0322%1 Oct →
nuke10–130.0414%1 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0219%1 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0328%1 Oct →
nuke12–160.0423%30 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.