Antalas

Antalas — CS2 Stats

76561197986706189[U:1:26440461]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,841Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,647Top 50% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60807 of 258952 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,768 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,647 +3,058 23 Aug – 29 Oct · 23 days played
18,58921,647peak 21,64723 Aug29 Oct
21,647Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,768Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-08-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,768
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 233 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,647
  • +2,617 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,353 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAntalasFACEITLevel 10 · 1,768 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,647 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,768csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning50
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateWWWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility7.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.4

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.0
Utility7.6
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time495ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 505ms → last ⅓ avg 495ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 11 Oct →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · inferno, 28 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · inferno, 10 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 28 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 65% over 17nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113–862%0.02
cacheB2010–1050%0.01
ancientS1711–665%0.01
anubisB157–847%0.01
dust2A106–460%0.02
nukeD103–730%0.01
mirage—42–250%-0.01
overpass—22–0100%0.09
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

631Matches
54%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
79.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8561%1.2716.2
Anubis7256%1.2217.5
Ancient5452%1.0514.6
Dust23148%1.0514.3
Nuke2948%1.0212.6
Cache2948%1.0815.2
Overpass2763%1.2717.9
Mirage128%0.8913.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
66.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
498msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
8.87HE damage / grenade
20.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9247% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10-0.0413%29 Oct →
inferno13–70.0121%29 Oct →
inferno13–20.0434%28 Oct →
dust213–20.1418%26 Oct →
dust213–5-0.058%26 Oct →
mirage16–130.0420%25 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0023%24 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0413%22 Oct →
nuke13–50.0518%22 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0222%22 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0316%21 Oct →
ancient13–70.0211%21 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0014%21 Oct →
inferno4–130.0827%20 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0720%20 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0214%17 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0313%17 Oct →
ancient6–130.1123%15 Oct →
ancient22–20-0.0617%14 Oct →
overpass13–40.0921%11 Oct →
inferno13–90.0121%11 Oct →
cache13–20.1624%11 Oct →
inferno2–130.0323%11 Oct →
inferno13–40.1622%11 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0126%10 Oct →
overpass13–60.0910%10 Oct →
cache13–80.0412%10 Oct →
inferno13–80.0420%10 Oct →
inferno9–1-0.060%10 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0327%6 Oct →
inferno13–60.0518%6 Oct →
nuke13–60.058%6 Oct →
inferno9–130.0122%5 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0816%3 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0232%3 Oct →
nuke4–130.0226%2 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0212%1 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0118%1 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0619%29 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0123%25 Sept →
ancient13–70.1624%25 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0112%25 Sept →
ancient13–60.0315%21 Sept →
dust26–130.0111%20 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0117%20 Sept →
ancient7–130.0919%20 Sept →
nuke4–130.008%19 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0122%19 Sept →
inferno13–60.0420%16 Sept →
ancient13–50.0218%15 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0230%13 Sept →
anubis11–130.0418%13 Sept →
inferno16–120.0211%12 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0216%11 Sept →
dust211–130.0116%11 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0316%9 Sept →
inferno0–1-0.110%9 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0218%9 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0315%9 Sept →
anubis13–50.0722%6 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0228%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0118%5 Sept →
anubis8–130.0224%5 Sept →
cache13–100.0122%5 Sept →
cache13–70.028%5 Sept →
anubis13–60.0723%5 Sept →
cache16–130.0023%2 Sept →
dust213–110.0218%2 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0011%1 Sept →
cache9–130.0117%1 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0122%1 Sept →
inferno10–130.0821%30 Aug →
cache13–70.1320%28 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0211%26 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0714%25 Aug →
anubis13–90.0123%25 Aug →
ancient13–60.0427%23 Aug →
ancient13–40.0414%23 Aug →
dust213–30.0320%23 Aug →
cache8–130.0515%23 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0211%21 Aug →
nuke9–130.0413%21 Aug →
dust28–130.0019%21 Aug →
inferno8–130.0318%21 Aug →
mirage2–60.000%21 Aug →
cache13–100.0611%19 Aug →
nuke13–90.1116%16 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0830%12 Aug →
inferno13–100.0215%12 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0521%12 Aug →
anubis13–90.0214%11 Aug →
cache21–25-0.0115%11 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0424%7 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0315%7 Aug →
dust213–50.0924%7 Aug →
inferno12–120.0622%4 Aug →
anubis10–130.0720%4 Aug →
anubis16–140.0625%1 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0222%1 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0327%1 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.