table

table — CS2 Stats

76561197985951074[U:1:25685346]Steam profile ↗

3,272Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,956Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.7%44.0%44.7%above
Shot accuracy3.2%11.6%11.9%8.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.121.031.04above
Match win rate46.7%45.1%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtableFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning44
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateWWLWLLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim3.6
Aggression6.1
Utility4.2
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch10.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 728ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning4.4
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time731ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 704ms → last ⅓ avg 731ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — office 13–2
132Biggest win — office
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
72In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A1810856%-0.01
ancientC146843%-0.03
nukeC114736%-0.01
anubisD102820%-0.03
infernoA85363%-0.01
overpassC73443%-0.03
officeC73443%0.05
wardenA53260%0.03
trainA53260%-0.01
mirage43175%-0.00
cache41325%-0.02
poseidon31233%0.01
sanctum21150%-0.04
alpine1010%0.01
stronghold110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,950Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
4,934Matches
46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
48.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
3.2%Shot accuracy
8,079MVPs
1,956Hours (in match)
5,730Bombs planted
1,215Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,894
AWP6,514
MAC-102,556
MP92,255
SSG 081,764

Lifetime map wins

5,338nuke
5,337dust2
5,309inferno
3,198vertigo
1,219train
815office
215italy
164lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches
58%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
103.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage650%1.0412.5
Nuke4100%0.9112.8
Anubis333%0.8713.7
Vertigo250%0.5612.0
Inferno2100%1.0618.0
Dust210%0.6813.0
Overpass10%1.6226.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
27.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.1%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
728msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
10.85HE damage / grenade
5.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 728.4057ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4892 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.024% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–7-0.0410%28 Aug
mirage13–30.0714%23 Jun
cache5–13-0.0020%14 Jun
dust213–5-0.0117%12 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0626%7 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0920%31 May
mirage16–14-0.0813%31 May
cache13–7-0.0323%19 May
cache10–13-0.0112%12 May
cache12–12-0.0529%12 May
anubis7–130.0115%15 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0629%15 Mar
dust28–13-0.0419%18 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0214%17 Feb
dust213–100.0319%17 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0826%17 Feb
dust26–13-0.0710%16 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0215%16 Feb
nuke13–40.1112%16 Feb
dust213–110.0122%16 Feb
ancient16–140.0130%16 Feb
dust213–10-0.0419%16 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0132%16 Feb
anubis11–130.0415%15 Feb
dust213–30.0318%15 Feb
dust210–13-0.0322%14 Feb
mirage6–130.0135%14 Feb
nuke8–130.0029%14 Feb
overpass3–13-0.0919%14 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0223%14 Feb
overpass13–70.0119%13 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0727%13 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0317%13 Feb
ancient13–40.0316%13 Feb
office7–130.0025%13 Feb
warden13–60.1517%12 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0512%11 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0511%11 Feb
dust213–100.0125%10 Feb
office13–90.0920%10 Feb
warden13–40.0137%9 Feb
office13–11-0.0227%9 Feb
train7–130.0213%9 Feb
office6–130.0321%9 Feb
train5–130.0523%8 Feb
dust210–130.0120%8 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0223%8 Feb
anubis13–90.0112%8 Feb
office6–130.0330%8 Feb
train13–9-0.0623%8 Feb
office12–120.0533%7 Feb
office13–20.1718%7 Feb
train13–6-0.0619%7 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0416%7 Feb
dust29–130.0111%7 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0314%7 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0623%7 Feb
nuke6–9-0.188%7 Feb
poseidon9–00.01100%7 Feb
inferno5–90.0218%7 Feb
sanctum9–20.0724%7 Feb
poseidon8–80.0425%7 Feb
inferno13–80.0924%7 Feb
overpass13–20.0419%6 Feb
train13–90.0126%6 Feb
inferno13–60.0230%6 Feb
warden8–13-0.0319%6 Feb
warden5–130.0420%6 Feb
sanctum3–9-0.1422%6 Feb
poseidon6–9-0.0217%6 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0814%5 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0222%5 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0123%4 Feb
dust29–13-0.0312%4 Feb
ancient13–110.0030%3 Feb
nuke13–90.0925%2 Feb
inferno3–13-0.1026%1 Feb
inferno13–40.0114%1 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0515%1 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0333%1 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0330%1 Feb
dust27–13-0.0430%1 Feb
inferno13–90.0228%31 Jan
nuke13–50.0214%31 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0626%31 Jan
ancient13–8-0.0526%31 Jan
alpine12–120.0116%31 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0818%30 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0513%30 Jan
anubis10–13-0.1313%28 Jan
dust213–5-0.0021%28 Jan
dust210–13-0.0421%27 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0720%26 Jan
anubis6–13-0.0615%26 Jan
dust213–100.0126%25 Jan
nuke13–70.0329%25 Jan
dust213–80.0326%25 Jan
stronghold13–70.0525%25 Jan
warden13–7-0.029%25 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0013%24 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →