xfxf

xfxf — CS2 Stats

76561197985260831[U:1:24995103]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

306Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#42398 of 251438 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,946 -757 12 Sept – 20 Sept · 2 days played
22,94623,703peak 23,70312 Sept20 Sept
23,703Peak Premier in tracked matches
64Days played since 2021-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxfxfFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning45
Utility11

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateLLLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility1.1
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch0.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 29% on CT to 12% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.5
Utility1.1
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time569ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 12 Jan →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · overpass, 15 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · anubis, 18 Sept →
16–1Biggest win · ancient, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
75Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC156–940%0.01
nukeA159–660%-0.00
vertigoB158–753%0.00
dust2A148–657%-0.01
mirageC125–742%-0.00
ancientA117–464%-0.01
anubisA74–357%-0.02
overpassS75–271%0.04
train—32–167%0.00
memento—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,152Matches
57%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
71.1ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2540%1.2412.4
Anubis367%0.9618.0
Mirage250%1.0614.5
Train10%0.8319.0
Overpass1100%1.809.0
Inferno10%1.0018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
563msReaction time
12.3%T opening success
29.3%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
6.44HE damage / grenade
15.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 12.3492% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–130.1627%16 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.105%9 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0627%7 Jul →
nuke10–20.0123%6 Jul →
train11–130.0118%4 Jul →
nuke11–130.0314%4 Jul →
nuke13–100.0415%3 Jul →
ancient16–14-0.0522%2 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0532%1 Jul →
nuke13–30.0327%1 Jul →
nuke5–130.0223%30 Jun →
inferno13–4-0.0520%20 Sept →
memento5–9-0.0521%18 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0119%12 Sept →
overpass11–00.027%19 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0314%19 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0340%18 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0321%18 Sept →
anubis13–10.0430%18 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0531%15 Sept →
overpass11–13-0.0346%15 Sept →
overpass13–00.1021%15 Sept →
nuke13–70.0033%14 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0014%14 Sept →
inferno25–220.0117%5 Sept →
mirage11–16-0.0227%5 Sept →
anubis6–16-0.0214%4 Sept →
mirage14–160.0321%30 Aug →
anubis5–16-0.0422%26 Aug →
mirage16–100.0925%26 Aug →
overpass16–120.0420%26 Aug →
vertigo16–90.0215%26 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0619%26 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0414%26 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.039%11 May →
dust210–16-0.0817%11 May →
vertigo16–11-0.0514%11 May →
dust216–19-0.0411%9 May →
vertigo8–16-0.0319%5 May →
mirage7–160.0422%5 May →
ancient12–160.0212%5 May →
vertigo16–120.0113%4 May →
overpass16–120.0219%3 May →
dust216–40.0417%27 Apr →
dust216–30.0725%27 Apr →
ancient16–10-0.0012%27 Apr →
dust216–14-0.0112%26 Apr →
mirage16–6-0.0010%25 Apr →
inferno9–16-0.0513%25 Apr →
overpass8–160.0125%19 Apr →
anubis16–10-0.0214%19 Apr →
nuke13–16-0.0611%18 Apr →
mirage16–40.0421%24 Mar →
ancient16–60.057%8 Mar →
mirage7–16-0.0510%8 Mar →
nuke16–110.0421%22 Feb →
vertigo19–16-0.0416%31 Jan →
dust216–10-0.0226%31 Jan →
anubis16–14-0.0312%29 Jan →
inferno17–19-0.0021%15 Jan →
mirage16–90.1129%15 Jan →
dust219–17-0.0517%13 Jan →
nuke16–90.1110%13 Jan →
ancient12–16-0.0413%13 Jan →
vertigo16–10-0.0718%12 Jan →
ancient16–14-0.0121%12 Jan →
dust216–13-0.0614%14 Nov →
nuke16–9-0.0722%23 Aug →
vertigo10–16-0.069%23 Aug →
mirage9–16-0.0512%23 Aug →
dust216–80.0518%18 Mar →
inferno9–16-0.067%3 Mar →
ancient8–16-0.0918%18 Feb →
ancient16–70.0112%17 Feb →
vertigo14–160.0425%1 Feb →
inferno11–160.0916%13 Jan →
vertigo9–30.2638%12 Jan →
vertigo7–16-0.0224%8 Jan →
dust214–16-0.0436%31 Dec →
inferno16–130.0217%24 Dec →
dust216–19-0.0019%23 Dec →
dust212–160.0230%14 Dec →
nuke13–160.0314%13 Dec →
inferno16–110.0016%9 Dec →
vertigo7–160.0113%9 Dec →
train16–110.0118%29 Nov →
nuke11–16-0.0212%18 Nov →
vertigo8–16-0.0724%17 Nov →
inferno10–16-0.0113%11 Nov →
inferno8–160.0019%10 Nov →
dust212–1-0.0013%10 Nov →
inferno16–100.0119%31 Oct →
overpass16–50.0821%31 Oct →
mirage10–16-0.0912%31 Oct →
train16–10-0.0013%31 Oct →
inferno15–190.0018%29 Oct →
dust28–16-0.039%19 Oct →
ancient16–10.0314%6 Oct →
vertigo16–120.0726%6 Oct →
vertigo10–17-0.019%19 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.