shaker

shaker — CS2 Stats

FI76561197984906456[U:1:24640728]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,151Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating26,660Top 5% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7533 of 230608 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,593 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,151 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 62 days played since 17 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,660 -7 23 Oct19 Sept · 24 days played
26,58928,483peak 28,48323 Oct19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 3,593 +0 29 Aug19 Sept · 5 observations
3,5933,593peak 3,59329 Aug19 Sept
28,483Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,593Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
62Days played since 2025-10-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,593
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 407 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,823 below peak (28,483)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,340 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshakerFACEITLevel 10 · 3,593 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,660 · Red bandPEAK ELO3,593csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning71
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55432Last 10055%Win rateLWWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −134ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility7.8
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.1
Utility7.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time569ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 18 Dec
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · nuke, 27 Dec
305msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · nuke, 27 Dec
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 14 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
29In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 88% over 8mirageWeakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2113862%0.02
mirageC2191243%0.03
nukeA2011955%0.02
anubisC94544%-0.00
ancientS87188%0.05
cacheC73443%0.04
infernoC73443%0.00
overpass21150%0.05
train220100%0.06
italy1010%0.12
office110100%0.14
warden110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,310Matches
57%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
80.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage47658%1.1015.5
Nuke40167%1.2116.1
Dust223353%1.0815.0
Ancient21955%1.0715.4
Anubis15251%1.0715.3
Inferno14359%1.0515.6
Train10856%1.2116.3
Overpass1631%0.9316.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
574msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
64.1%CT opening success
0.80Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
9.45HE damage / grenade
16.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.8438% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–16-0.0510%13 Sept
dust213–70.0021%13 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0522%13 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0113%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.0226%27 Aug
dust213–50.0338%14 Aug
cache8–130.0016%14 Aug
mirage13–00.1016%14 Aug
nuke13–80.0324%14 Aug
anubis13–50.0117%14 Aug
overpass23–25-0.0120%16 Jun
ancient13–50.0113%28 May
italy8–130.1234%25 May
office13–50.1423%25 May
overpass13–30.1242%25 May
cache13–60.0718%25 May
anubis2–13-0.0419%23 May
cache6–130.0413%23 May
nuke10–13-0.0217%23 May
mirage6–130.0620%22 May
anubis6–130.0423%22 May
inferno13–60.0225%17 May
nuke13–30.1539%17 May
dust213–40.0533%14 May
nuke13–60.0514%14 May
nuke13–10-0.0218%13 May
cache6–130.0922%10 May
cache13–110.0622%5 May
cache6–130.0215%5 May
cache13–100.0124%4 May
inferno16–120.0121%3 May
nuke13–40.1124%3 May
inferno13–60.0621%3 May
dust212–16-0.076%27 Apr
nuke9–130.0116%26 Apr
inferno11–130.0116%22 Apr
dust213–40.0422%21 Apr
dust29–130.0623%9 Apr
anubis15–150.0224%9 Apr
anubis13–40.0725%7 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0523%5 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0329%28 Mar
nuke13–100.0219%22 Mar
mirage13–20.1117%22 Mar
nuke13–40.1116%19 Mar
mirage11–130.0010%19 Mar
nuke13–90.0825%12 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0315%12 Mar
dust211–13-0.0232%12 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0113%11 Mar
mirage13–7-0.024%9 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0520%9 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0017%8 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0512%8 Mar
nuke6–130.0227%5 Mar
dust213–9-0.0124%24 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0015%15 Feb
dust213–70.0325%11 Feb
mirage7–130.0614%9 Feb
mirage13–90.0219%7 Feb
anubis13–00.0417%4 Feb
mirage13–00.030%4 Feb
mirage13–80.1128%4 Feb
nuke6–130.0114%3 Feb
dust213–60.0830%26 Jan
warden13–20.0839%21 Jan
dust213–10-0.0224%19 Jan
dust213–80.0528%17 Jan
mirage11–130.0122%15 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0023%14 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0215%10 Jan
mirage13–20.0936%10 Jan
inferno3–13-0.055%31 Dec
dust213–100.0013%30 Dec
dust213–70.0933%30 Dec
dust26–13-0.0636%30 Dec
ancient1–13-0.0415%29 Dec
nuke2–13-0.1050%27 Dec
dust213–60.0915%23 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0116%23 Dec
ancient13–100.0333%23 Dec
ancient13–40.1618%18 Dec
dust210–13-0.0120%17 Dec
mirage9–130.0419%11 Dec
dust215–150.0513%30 Nov
dust213–50.0221%21 Nov
ancient13–60.0820%18 Nov
mirage11–130.0623%17 Nov
ancient5–00.0943%8 Nov
nuke13–50.0823%8 Nov
mirage13–70.0224%4 Nov
mirage9–130.0341%4 Nov
ancient13–110.0733%4 Nov
inferno7–13-0.0118%25 Oct
train13–100.0524%25 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0121%23 Oct
mirage4–13-0.0124%23 Oct
dust210–13-0.045%18 Oct
mirage9–13-0.0328%18 Oct
train13–40.0733%17 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →