Dildo Beggins

Dildo Beggins — CS2 Stats

76561197984221834[U:1:23956106]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

899Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,423Purple band · top ~18.8% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,423 +1,309 9 Apr – 24 Oct · 26 days played
16,11419,280peak 19,2809 Apr24 Oct
19,331Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-04-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,857 below peak (19,280)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,577 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDildo BegginsPREMIER17,423 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning75
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.6
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 74% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning7.5
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels9.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 11 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · nuke, 22 Apr →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 22 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 21 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD185–1328%0.02
anubisA1811–761%0.02
nukeC188–1044%0.01
ancientC135–838%0.02
infernoA116–555%0.03
cacheB105–550%0.03
dust2A85–363%-0.02
overpass—43–175%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,208Matches
51%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
87.1ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3954%1.3119.3
Nuke2871%1.4018.5
Anubis1729%1.2219.4
Mirage1741%1.3619.7
Train1587%1.5122.0
Ancient944%0.9714.0
Overpass729%1.1316.3
Dust2540%1.2116.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
556msReaction time
73.7%T opening success
66.6%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
7.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0210%24 Oct →
mirage3–130.0812%22 Oct →
inferno13–70.0525%22 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0524%22 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0817%22 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0217%21 Oct →
dust27–130.0312%21 Oct →
cache16–130.0125%21 Oct →
anubis13–110.0220%21 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0212%17 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0515%17 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.042%17 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0114%17 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0410%17 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0321%17 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0223%17 Oct →
inferno13–110.0324%16 Oct →
inferno13–110.0914%11 Oct →
cache13–60.1417%11 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0224%11 Oct →
mirage5–130.0611%11 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0312%5 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0129%5 Oct →
mirage13–110.1213%5 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0413%4 Oct →
cache13–110.0426%4 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0015%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0616%2 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0011%10 Sept →
nuke15–150.0311%10 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0114%10 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.057%9 Sept →
cache13–90.0921%9 Sept →
mirage5–130.0221%8 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0521%8 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0128%8 Sept →
inferno7–130.0228%8 Sept →
anubis13–110.0721%5 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0010%5 Sept →
nuke13–110.1018%5 Sept →
cache16–130.089%5 Sept →
inferno13–40.0311%5 Sept →
mirage10–130.0311%5 Sept →
anubis13–60.017%5 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0125%5 Sept →
nuke13–100.0130%5 Sept →
ancient13–40.0826%4 Sept →
inferno13–50.1213%4 Sept →
ancient13–70.082%4 Sept →
nuke13–160.0226%4 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0019%4 Sept →
cache10–130.0212%7 Jul →
dust210–13-0.058%21 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0121%21 Jun →
nuke13–20.0619%21 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0313%18 Jun →
mirage15–150.0614%18 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0710%18 Jun →
anubis13–70.0317%17 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0421%17 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0017%16 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0124%16 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.055%16 Jun →
mirage13–100.0815%14 Jun →
ancient8–130.0418%14 Jun →
anubis13–60.0518%14 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.0219%14 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0718%8 Jun →
ancient13–100.0418%8 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0321%8 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0619%8 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0213%8 Jun →
overpass13–110.0516%8 Jun →
nuke15–150.0324%4 Jun →
anubis13–110.0526%4 Jun →
overpass13–100.0522%4 Jun →
anubis13–90.0514%4 Jun →
nuke5–130.0421%1 Jun →
nuke9–130.0213%1 Jun →
anubis11–130.0629%1 Jun →
ancient13–40.0123%24 May →
mirage15–150.0927%24 May →
nuke13–110.0126%15 May →
ancient8–130.0421%14 May →
ancient13–80.0429%14 May →
mirage13–60.0513%14 May →
anubis16–130.0715%14 May →
nuke13–80.0722%14 May →
overpass7–13-0.0323%22 Apr →
nuke13–60.0035%22 Apr →
anubis14–16-0.0015%22 Apr →
nuke13–50.0719%17 Apr →
inferno13–40.0819%17 Apr →
anubis13–60.0711%17 Apr →
overpass13–100.0124%17 Apr →
ancient10–130.0724%17 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0322%9 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.033%9 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0615%9 Apr →
ancient3–130.0124%9 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.