qèamer🔥

qèamer🔥 — CS2 Stats

76561197983264180[U:1:22998452]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

758Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,551 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 758 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 21 Apr 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,898 +429 27 Feb25 May · 13 days played
21,53224,118peak 24,11827 Feb25 May
24,234Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,551Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2025-04-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,551
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 200 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGqèamer🔥FACEITLevel 7 · 1,551 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,551csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning52
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateLLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · +78ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility6.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch2.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.2
Utility6.4
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time577ms+22ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · overpass, 16 Dec
33%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · mirage, 5 Apr
391msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · vertigo, 10 May
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 22 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
135In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2691735%-0.01
dust2A1710759%0.00
anubisC145936%0.00
overpassC114736%0.00
ancientD103730%0.01
infernoD62433%-0.00
nukeS65183%-0.00
vertigo43175%0.05
cache31233%-0.04
cache_b21150%-0.04
train1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

860Matches
51%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
90.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3549%1.1016.8
Dust22654%1.2918.2
Anubis2552%1.0214.0
Ancient2454%1.1616.8
Overpass2467%1.5317.3
Inferno2339%1.1716.9
Nuke1443%1.2217.5
Train838%1.2719.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
578msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
14.93HE damage / grenade
8.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2926% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–7-0.0320%7 Aug
cache1–13-0.1020%7 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0222%2 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0220%2 Aug
nuke13–70.0116%25 May
dust213–11-0.0323%25 May
mirage13–50.0514%25 May
mirage3–13-0.0927%20 May
dust213–50.0321%20 May
anubis7–13-0.038%20 May
mirage1–13-0.0920%20 May
vertigo16–140.0115%10 May
vertigo12–160.0313%10 May
vertigo9–70.0711%10 May
mirage2–13-0.058%6 May
dust24–130.0214%6 May
inferno4–9-0.0024%2 May
cache8–130.0115%1 May
cache13–6-0.0429%1 May
cache_b13–6-0.039%26 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0110%26 Apr
overpass4–130.0215%26 Apr
overpass7–130.0122%26 Apr
dust27–13-0.0324%12 Apr
dust26–130.0115%12 Apr
ancient16–140.0923%12 Apr
mirage13–100.0514%11 Apr
nuke13–80.0111%11 Apr
dust213–110.0320%11 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0121%9 Apr
overpass1–13-0.0312%6 Apr
ancient13–110.0012%6 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0333%5 Apr
mirage5–130.017%5 Apr
anubis13–110.0618%5 Apr
mirage13–80.0824%5 Apr
anubis13–90.1015%1 Apr
nuke13–80.0118%1 Apr
dust216–14-0.0111%1 Apr
anubis13–100.0412%31 Mar
mirage13–50.1322%31 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0214%29 Mar
anubis10–130.0216%22 Mar
overpass10–13-0.016%22 Mar
cache_b7–13-0.064%22 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0519%22 Mar
mirage5–11-0.0219%22 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0210%21 Mar
mirage5–130.0615%21 Mar
vertigo13–70.0717%21 Mar
dust213–5-0.0213%20 Mar
anubis13–4-0.047%20 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0821%14 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0512%14 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0515%11 Mar
mirage1–13-0.115%11 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0417%10 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0522%10 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0014%1 Mar
dust25–13-0.0123%1 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0231%1 Mar
anubis13–70.0012%27 Feb
dust216–140.0422%27 Feb
dust213–60.0315%27 Feb
dust27–13-0.0223%26 Feb
ancient8–130.0016%26 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0526%26 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0514%17 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0411%14 Feb
mirage12–12-0.0216%13 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0911%25 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0418%25 Jan
overpass3–13-0.022%25 Jan
ancient15–15-0.0312%25 Jan
dust213–110.0124%24 Jan
ancient10–130.0523%24 Jan
inferno11–130.0116%24 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0420%24 Jan
ancient10–13-0.0021%24 Jan
mirage6–130.0418%22 Jan
overpass13–1-0.0210%22 Jan
nuke13–20.0114%22 Jan
mirage13–50.0613%22 Jan
ancient13–80.0115%22 Jan
dust213–8-0.0314%22 Jan
ancient11–130.0816%11 Jan
overpass13–8-0.0423%6 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0316%19 Dec
overpass13–40.1623%16 Dec
nuke13–9-0.0315%16 Dec
dust25–130.0319%16 Dec
overpass13–30.048%17 Aug
anubis9–130.0210%24 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0310%23 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0512%23 Jun
inferno8–130.0814%22 Jun
dust29–130.0310%18 Jun
ancient3–13-0.049%1 May
dust216–14-0.0223%29 Apr
train2–13-0.0410%21 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →