Snax

Snax — CS2 Stats

PRO_-GamerLegionPolandIGLSettings & gear profile →

76561197982141573[U:1:21875845]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,160Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongSupport
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,160 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 23 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,627 -401 22 Apr2 Jul · 6 days played
26,40727,651peak 27,65122 Apr2 Jul
Faceit ELO: 3,678 +0 27 Aug17 Sept · 11 observations
3,6783,678peak 3,67827 Aug17 Sept
27,651Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,678Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-03-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,678
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 322 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnaxPEAK ELO3,678csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning68
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5644Last 10056%Win rateLLWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.3pp headshot accuracy · −84ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 465ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 421ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility7.9
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.8
Utility7.9
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time490ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 490ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–11 · inferno, 25 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–2 · overpass, 15 May
219msFastest reaction time · 1–2 · mirage, 13 May
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 15 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1413In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 23anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26131350%-0.00
infernoS2316770%-0.00
ancientS1913668%0.01
nukeC145936%-0.02
dust2C52340%0.03
overpassA53260%-0.02
anubisD51420%-0.06
cache330100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,092Matches
59%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
79.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10764%1.2515.8
Ancient5969%1.2015.9
Nuke4674%1.2916.6
Dust24674%1.1515.4
Anubis2662%1.1515.0
Vertigo1765%1.1715.8
Overpass1675%1.1017.3
Train1346%1.0515.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$36,958Inventory value249ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
AWP | Medusa (Minimal Wear)$1,866★ Butterfly Knife | Doppler (Factory New)$1,828★ Butterfly Knife | Gamma Doppler (Factory New)$1,808★ Butterfly Knife | Marble Fade (Factory New)$1,746★ StatTrak™ Karambit | Gamma Doppler (Factory New)$1,726M4A1-S | Welcome to the Jungle (Minimal Wear)$1,716

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
42.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.3%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
474msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
49.6%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
14.3%Flash assists
8.88HE damage / grenade
15.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.049% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–130.0329%12 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0613%2 Sept
mirage5–10.0646%2 Sept
cache16–14-0.0015%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0131%25 Aug
inferno13–110.1618%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0118%22 Aug
ancient7–30.0932%22 Aug
mirage13–90.1214%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0110%19 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0414%19 Aug
ancient22–19-0.019%19 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0311%13 Aug
dust213–30.0620%13 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0221%12 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0418%22 Jul
dust211–13-0.0513%22 Jul
mirage13–20.1221%3 Jul
ancient13–60.0412%2 Jul
nuke7–130.0323%2 Jul
dust214–160.0317%2 Jul
cache13–50.0627%30 Jun
mirage3–130.0323%30 Jun
inferno16–140.0617%30 Jun
ancient14–160.0115%24 Jun
nuke10–130.0018%24 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0311%23 Jun
mirage10–13-0.067%23 Jun
ancient13–50.037%23 Jun
inferno13–70.1510%18 Jun
cache13–90.0824%16 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0314%16 Jun
ancient13–80.0914%16 Jun
inferno13–70.0524%15 Jun
nuke13–10.1523%15 Jun
mirage6–130.0826%15 Jun
inferno9–5-0.0315%13 Jun
inferno9–1-0.0111%13 Jun
mirage13–110.0222%11 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0018%7 Jun
mirage13–80.0612%7 Jun
inferno11–12-0.0612%7 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0417%6 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0419%6 Jun
ancient13–110.0514%4 Jun
overpass16–140.0417%4 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0316%3 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0914%3 Jun
inferno13–110.0224%2 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0019%2 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0914%17 May
anubis9–13-0.1017%17 May
mirage3–13-0.0630%17 May
ancient13–90.0214%16 May
mirage3–13-0.0814%16 May
inferno13–6-0.0626%16 May
overpass2–11-0.0814%15 May
overpass4–2-0.0450%15 May
nuke13–6-0.0424%15 May
inferno13–8-0.0325%15 May
mirage13–3-0.0024%14 May
ancient13–80.0113%14 May
mirage12–70.0215%13 May
mirage1–2-0.0130%13 May
nuke13–6-0.0318%13 May
ancient2–0-0.070%12 May
ancient11–1-0.0119%12 May
inferno4–13-0.0219%12 May
mirage11–13-0.019%12 May
inferno13–9-0.0114%12 May
mirage9–7-0.084%12 May
overpass14–16-0.0015%2 May
mirage1–13-0.0410%2 May
inferno16–140.0415%2 May
overpass13–8-0.0032%2 May
mirage10–13-0.0410%1 May
ancient4–13-0.0525%1 May
nuke13–5-0.0135%30 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0939%30 Apr
mirage13–100.0233%30 Apr
ancient13–10.1622%22 Apr
inferno13–80.0425%22 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0311%22 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0736%4 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0813%4 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0523%3 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0111%3 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0413%2 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0824%2 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0219%1 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0528%27 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0411%27 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0411%27 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0528%27 Mar
dust213–60.1020%23 Mar
ancient13–40.0323%23 Mar
inferno19–17-0.048%23 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0311%23 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0311%23 Mar
inferno19–17-0.048%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →