gade

gade — CS2 Stats

PRONickRetiredDenmarkCoachSettings & gear profile →

DK76561197981621332[U:1:21355604]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

911Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+18Tracked matches · now 911
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 28 Oct 2022. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

42Days played since 2022-10-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgadeFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning67
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6337Last 10063%Win rateWLWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.1
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.7
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time610ms+63ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 3 Aug
41%Best headshot accuracy · 8–16 · vertigo, 31 Oct
383msFastest reaction time · 16–8 · overpass, 14 Nov
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
81Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 10vertigoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2014670%0.03
anubisS1813572%0.00
ancientC1771041%0.02
nukeS107370%0.01
overpassS108280%0.05
infernoA95456%0.01
vertigoD72529%-0.01
dust2S64267%0.05
cache220100%0.00
train110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,576Matches
67%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
84.1ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
60Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5161%1.4118.8
Dust23554%1.3016.8
Ancient3551%1.2917.3
Anubis3345%1.1116.0
Nuke2357%1.1116.9
Cache1377%1.5917.6
Inferno933%1.3817.1
Vertigo475%1.3926.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$9Inventory value34ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
PP-Bizon | Lumen (Minimal Wear)$4G3SG1 | Keeping Tabs (Minimal Wear)$3PP-Bizon | Lumen (Battle-Scarred)$1XM1014 | Blue Steel (Field-Tested)$0MP9 | Orange Peel (Field-Tested)$0Five-SeveN | Forest Night (Minimal Wear)$0

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
603msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
11.6%Flash assists
12.27HE damage / grenade
13.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7122% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–11-0.0338%13 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0510%30 Aug
dust213–60.1233%30 Aug
dust26–13-0.0425%8 Aug
cache13–100.0436%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0919%4 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0416%15 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0420%15 Jun
dust216–140.0126%14 Jun
mirage8–130.0822%13 Jun
ancient21–250.0118%17 May
ancient5–130.0138%17 May
mirage13–40.0626%29 May
inferno13–90.0319%7 Mar
dust213–70.0428%7 Mar
train13–100.0628%20 Nov
mirage13–100.0128%4 Oct
dust211–130.0622%10 Aug
mirage13–10.1529%3 Aug
anubis10–30.0216%3 Aug
ancient13–00.1233%3 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0222%5 Dec
nuke16–90.0930%3 Dec
mirage16–110.0525%3 Dec
anubis6–16-0.0118%2 Dec
vertigo9–16-0.1020%2 Dec
anubis16–120.0122%2 Dec
ancient8–16-0.0431%2 Dec
anubis8–160.0331%1 Dec
inferno7–16-0.0328%1 Dec
inferno9–16-0.0324%1 Dec
anubis16–13-0.0221%1 Dec
anubis16–9-0.0417%1 Dec
nuke16–7-0.0021%30 Nov
overpass12–16-0.0031%30 Nov
inferno16–9-0.0121%30 Nov
overpass16–130.0820%30 Nov
anubis16–120.0119%30 Nov
anubis19–17-0.0126%27 Nov
mirage16–12-0.0330%27 Nov
anubis13–160.0513%27 Nov
ancient14–16-0.0231%25 Nov
mirage16–100.1229%25 Nov
anubis16–13-0.0228%25 Nov
nuke16–19-0.0328%25 Nov
overpass16–120.0220%25 Nov
mirage4–160.1118%24 Nov
nuke16–110.0126%24 Nov
mirage16–90.0835%24 Nov
anubis16–140.0815%23 Nov
anubis16–12-0.0125%23 Nov
overpass11–16-0.0017%23 Nov
nuke16–130.0922%23 Nov
anubis16–100.0221%22 Nov
mirage16–80.0230%22 Nov
overpass16–100.0332%22 Nov
anubis16–90.0429%21 Nov
ancient16–70.1229%21 Nov
anubis13–16-0.0019%21 Nov
vertigo16–130.0418%21 Nov
overpass16–80.1125%21 Nov
anubis6–16-0.0323%20 Nov
anubis16–12-0.0712%20 Nov
ancient16–50.0722%20 Nov
ancient15–190.0216%18 Nov
mirage10–16-0.0541%17 Nov
mirage16–140.0223%17 Nov
inferno22–200.0324%17 Nov
ancient17–19-0.0319%16 Nov
ancient16–5-0.0323%15 Nov
inferno16–80.0427%15 Nov
vertigo16–19-0.0220%14 Nov
nuke12–16-0.0317%14 Nov
mirage16–14-0.0321%14 Nov
inferno16–110.0115%14 Nov
nuke19–17-0.0221%14 Nov
ancient11–16-0.0421%14 Nov
overpass16–80.1017%14 Nov
inferno26–280.0118%13 Nov
vertigo16–12-0.0019%13 Nov
dust216–80.1131%13 Nov
nuke16–40.1032%13 Nov
nuke25–23-0.0528%13 Nov
ancient14–160.0235%12 Nov
mirage13–16-0.0323%12 Nov
ancient13–16-0.0225%11 Nov
mirage16–140.0520%5 Nov
overpass16–140.0933%3 Nov
ancient16–100.0416%3 Nov
vertigo12–16-0.0614%3 Nov
mirage16–110.0011%3 Nov
overpass16–100.0216%2 Nov
ancient16–40.1030%2 Nov
overpass16–140.0527%1 Nov
ancient13–160.1128%31 Oct
vertigo10–160.0319%31 Oct
vertigo8–160.0541%31 Oct
mirage16–130.0219%29 Oct
inferno6–160.0223%28 Oct
mirage16–110.0828%28 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →