tibawb — CS2 Stats

76561197980854821[U:1:20589093]✓ No bans

913Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,299Pink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13878 of 36590 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,298 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtibawbFACEITLevel 6 · 1,298 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,299 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning51
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48502Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression7.0
Utility6.6
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.1
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time662ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30161453%0.00
infernoA159660%0.01
cacheS128467%0.02
mirageB115645%-0.01
ancientD102820%-0.01
anubisD93633%-0.03
nukeB84450%0.01
overpassD51420%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

333Matches
52%Win rate
1.65Avg K/D
85.5ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1932%1.2717.1
Dust21833%1.3017.8
Mirage1747%1.1718.4
Ancient1040%0.9614.6
Anubis1060%1.1715.2
Nuke743%0.9415.1
Train250%1.5421.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.4%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
659msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
54.0%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
12.72HE damage / grenade
9.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.816% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–130.0114%29 Aug
cache13–11-0.0315%29 Aug
dust21–13-0.1215%24 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0529%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.0317%23 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0721%15 Aug
dust213–100.0418%15 Aug
mirage11–13-0.018%14 Aug
inferno15–150.0112%10 Aug
dust29–13-0.097%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.0411%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0621%31 Jul
dust216–13-0.0115%30 Jul
nuke13–50.0911%29 Jul
dust215–150.0413%29 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0526%29 Jul
dust213–100.0020%28 Jul
cache13–90.0310%27 Jul
cache13–7-0.0112%24 Jul
dust213–30.0927%23 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0314%23 Jul
dust216–140.009%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0122%21 Jul
nuke16–140.0320%21 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0115%20 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0012%20 Jul
cache13–80.0411%19 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0122%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0719%4 Jul
dust213–70.0518%4 Jul
nuke13–40.0420%4 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0123%3 Jul
dust29–130.0119%27 Jun
mirage13–40.0014%27 Jun
ancient13–90.0712%22 Jun
dust213–10.0116%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0519%21 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0015%21 Jun
dust213–30.0515%21 Jun
cache10–13-0.0410%20 Jun
cache6–130.0319%20 Jun
cache10–13-0.0330%19 Jun
overpass12–16-0.0016%15 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0319%15 Jun
inferno13–10.079%14 Jun
dust210–13-0.0214%14 Jun
dust213–110.0218%14 Jun
dust29–130.0117%8 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0129%2 Jun
inferno13–50.018%1 Jun
ancient9–130.0218%18 May
dust23–13-0.0717%18 May
anubis5–13-0.0612%12 May
cache6–130.0223%12 May
cache13–20.0919%10 May
cache13–90.0314%10 May
cache13–70.0616%9 May
cache13–90.0711%4 May
mirage13–8-0.0525%1 Apr
inferno7–130.0011%29 Mar
nuke5–130.0218%15 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0216%15 Mar
overpass13–110.007%15 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0524%14 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0015%9 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0115%9 Mar
dust213–110.0129%8 Mar
inferno6–130.0210%8 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0323%8 Mar
anubis1–13-0.0911%7 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0024%7 Mar
dust213–9-0.0212%7 Mar
ancient6–130.0023%6 Mar
inferno13–70.0310%6 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0212%4 Mar
mirage13–70.1016%4 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0011%3 Mar
dust216–120.0916%3 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0418%1 Mar
overpass3–130.0229%28 Feb
inferno13–100.0721%28 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0211%28 Feb
ancient4–13-0.1124%27 Feb
inferno1–13-0.1029%27 Feb
dust25–13-0.0323%26 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0418%26 Feb
anubis13–70.0224%26 Feb
dust28–4-0.0417%26 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0416%25 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0513%25 Feb
inferno13–60.0720%24 Feb
dust213–110.0213%24 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0711%23 Feb
dust213–70.1423%23 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0113%22 Feb
ancient13–20.0714%22 Feb
dust29–13-0.0319%22 Feb
dust213–60.0417%22 Feb
inferno13–90.0515%22 Feb
inferno11–130.0013%22 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →