Stone

Stone — CS2 Stats

76561197980504048[U:1:20238320]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,805Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating21,311Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#63324 of 251243 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,485 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (36 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,311 -1,532 17 Apr – 5 Sept · 28 days played
18,43023,286peak 23,28617 Apr5 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,485 +0 30 Aug – 1 Sept · 2 observations
1,4851,485peak 1,48530 Aug1 Sept
23,366Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,485Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-04-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,485
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 46 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,975 below peak (23,286)
  • +808 over 30 days · improving
  • -962 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,689 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStoneFACEITLevel 7 · 1,485 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,311 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,485csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning41
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWLLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +12.1pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility5.1
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.1
Utility5.1
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time602ms+44ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 5 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 4–10 · nuke, 22 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · cache, 28 May →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 10 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 10dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2815–1354%-0.00
nukeC2511–1444%-0.02
mirageA116–555%-0.01
dust2D103–730%-0.01
infernoA106–460%-0.03
ancientC83–538%-0.02
anubisA74–357%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,002Matches
50%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
71.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke16555%0.9314.1
Ancient15050%0.9114.1
Mirage14644%0.8112.9
Inferno12947%0.8812.6
Anubis4945%0.8413.5
Dust24842%0.7412.3
Vertigo2744%0.7813.1
Train2662%0.8912.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
67.5%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
606msReaction time
19.9%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
11.03HE damage / grenade
5.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3918 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.9259% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.0917%5 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0533%5 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0037%4 Sept →
nuke4–10-0.1667%22 Aug →
ancient3–30.0413%19 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0213%19 Aug →
nuke13–20.0218%15 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0424%11 Aug →
inferno13–00.0250%10 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0211%3 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0428%3 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0220%3 Aug →
cache12–4-0.0516%25 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0224%25 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.038%25 Jul →
anubis13–90.0110%24 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0810%24 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.039%24 Jul →
cache13–70.0123%24 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.1313%21 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0411%21 Jul →
dust213–50.0419%20 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0014%19 Jul →
cache12–120.0111%19 Jul →
cache9–130.0118%18 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0310%18 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0421%18 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.044%18 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0215%17 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0521%14 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0812%13 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0410%13 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0417%12 Jul →
dust27–130.0529%10 Jul →
inferno13–70.0121%10 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.0228%10 Jul →
cache5–130.0015%10 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0113%10 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0014%6 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0021%5 Jul →
nuke3–5-0.0225%4 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0115%4 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0727%4 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0115%3 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0116%3 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0320%3 Jul →
anubis13–90.0121%28 Jun →
inferno16–14-0.0312%28 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0022%28 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0314%27 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0321%27 Jun →
cache13–70.0323%27 Jun →
cache13–9-0.0515%27 Jun →
mirage13–90.0123%24 Jun →
ancient1–13-0.049%22 Jun →
mirage13–80.0216%22 Jun →
nuke13–110.0420%22 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0213%22 Jun →
cache9–13-0.0421%19 Jun →
nuke7–2-0.0335%18 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0910%11 Jun →
cache13–5-0.0113%11 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0330%11 Jun →
cache13–50.0423%11 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0422%11 Jun →
cache12–120.0112%28 May →
dust212–12-0.0518%28 May →
cache11–130.0220%28 May →
nuke11–13-0.0324%27 May →
nuke10–13-0.0313%26 May →
anubis6–13-0.0414%26 May →
ancient3–13-0.0415%26 May →
dust213–40.0122%26 May →
mirage3–13-0.1018%25 May →
cache13–100.0713%24 May →
dust213–16-0.0332%23 May →
cache9–130.0618%19 May →
cache13–20.0017%15 May →
mirage13–80.0223%8 May →
cache13–11-0.0426%8 May →
mirage13–110.0624%7 May →
cache13–80.0820%6 May →
cache13–10-0.0316%5 May →
cache13–3-0.0013%3 May →
cache13–10.0021%3 May →
cache8–130.0210%3 May →
cache3–13-0.0713%30 Apr →
cache13–100.0626%30 Apr →
nuke10–130.0011%26 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0517%26 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0417%25 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0311%22 Apr →
nuke13–100.0224%22 Apr →
mirage13–4-0.0314%19 Apr →
nuke2–13-0.1221%18 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0516%18 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0110%17 Apr →
ancient13–70.0110%17 Apr →
dust213–80.0513%17 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0211%17 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.