Odexiv

Odexiv — CS2 Stats

SE76561197980099418[U:1:19833690]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

561Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating20,576Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#68389 of 232454 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 561 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 24 Jun 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,576 -2,098 10 Jul15 Sept · 4 days played
20,57622,674peak 22,67410 Jul15 Sept
22,674Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2025-06-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,098 below peak (22,674)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,424 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOdexivPREMIER20,576 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim23
Positioning36
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48493Last 10048%Win rateWWWLLWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 721 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim2.3
Utility3.7
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 66% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.3
Positioning3.6
Utility3.7
Mechanics2.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time613ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 683ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.03Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 14 Jul
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 21 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 13 Jun
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
94In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 37dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA37231462%-0.05
ancientC28111739%-0.05
nukeA116555%-0.03
cacheC83538%-0.06
overpassA74357%-0.04
dust2D51420%-0.05
anubis3030%-0.08
mirage1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

100Matches
56%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
61.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3174%0.8211.4
Ancient1735%0.6210.9
Nuke1765%0.6810.6
Anubis1533%0.6311.8
Train580%0.7615.4
Overpass475%0.629.5
Cache450%0.619.0
Mirage250%0.769.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
24.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
22.8%Spray accuracy
59.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
628msReaction time
20.7%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
9.72HE damage / grenade
4.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.447 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.7308% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.1112%10 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0912%2 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0319%2 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0319%18 Jul
cache8–13-0.0714%18 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0023%18 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0413%17 Jul
cache13–10-0.0815%17 Jul
cache15–15-0.0120%17 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0615%16 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0116%16 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0111%16 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0111%15 Jul
cache3–13-0.110%14 Jul
cache8–6-0.0830%14 Jul
inferno13–30.0319%14 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0820%13 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0230%13 Jul
anubis6–13-0.1411%13 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0216%13 Jul
cache9–13-0.0135%13 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0920%13 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0315%8 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0619%13 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0417%13 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0610%31 May
nuke13–3-0.0013%31 May
nuke8–13-0.1114%14 May
cache7–13-0.0323%14 May
ancient7–13-0.0224%10 May
inferno9–13-0.037%10 May
ancient13–60.000%8 May
inferno16–13-0.0616%8 May
inferno10–13-0.0622%30 Apr
ancient13–8-0.1015%30 Apr
overpass13–5-0.0710%30 Apr
inferno13–8-0.1021%25 Apr
ancient6–13-0.1013%25 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0631%17 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0532%17 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0514%5 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0626%5 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0316%28 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0232%28 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0711%22 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0820%22 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0311%27 Feb
ancient13–4-0.035%22 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0221%15 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0715%15 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0512%31 Jan
overpass13–3-0.0432%25 Jan
ancient1–13-0.0823%16 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0521%16 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0916%5 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0511%5 Jan
inferno13–16-0.0222%2 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0512%2 Jan
ancient12–16-0.0116%13 Dec
overpass13–8-0.0220%13 Dec
nuke14–16-0.0617%21 Nov
ancient6–13-0.064%21 Nov
dust213–6-0.0318%21 Nov
dust27–13-0.1024%10 Nov
inferno18–22-0.0417%8 Nov
dust25–130.0028%8 Nov
inferno6–13-0.1116%3 Nov
overpass13–11-0.0224%16 Oct
overpass4–13-0.0719%16 Oct
ancient8–13-0.1017%10 Oct
ancient13–3-0.0417%10 Oct
inferno13–11-0.0411%10 Oct
inferno7–13-0.0324%26 Sept
overpass6–130.0022%26 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0516%19 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0411%19 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0617%19 Sept
dust28–13-0.0711%14 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0119%14 Sept
inferno6–13-0.128%26 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0613%26 Aug
nuke13–50.0129%15 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0614%15 Aug
nuke13–4-0.049%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0223%14 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0329%14 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0141%21 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0112%14 Jul
inferno13–100.0018%10 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0130%10 Jul
inferno19–17-0.0718%7 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0818%7 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0324%5 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0330%5 Jul
dust23–13-0.036%5 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0625%4 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0622%28 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0621%28 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0327%28 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0124%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →