Odexiv — CS2 Stats

SE76561197980099418[U:1:19833690]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

561Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.5 Learning

Premier CS Rating20,576Pink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim23

Positioning36

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWWWLLWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.3

Aggression3.9

Utility3.7

Positioning3.6

Opening Duels0.1

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.3

Positioning3.6

Utility3.7

Mechanics2.2

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact10.0

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.05

Reaction time613ms−70ms

first ⅓ avg 683ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms

Headshot accuracy16.3%−3.4%

first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.03Best rating — inferno 13–3

13–3Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 37dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	37	23–14	62%	-0.05
ancient	C	28	11–17	39%	-0.05
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.03
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.06
overpass	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.04
dust2	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.05
anubis	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.08
mirage	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

100Matches

56%Win rate

0.74Avg K/D

61.0ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

7%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	31	74%	0.82	11.4
Ancient	17	35%	0.62	10.9
Nuke	17	65%	0.68	10.6
Anubis	15	33%	0.63	11.8
Train	5	80%	0.76	15.4
Overpass	4	75%	0.62	9.5
Cache	4	50%	0.61	9.0
Mirage	2	50%	0.76	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy

24.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

22.8%Spray accuracy

59.7%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

628msReaction time

20.7%T opening success

40.0%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

9.72HE damage / grenade

4.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.447 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 20.7308% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–6	-0.11	12%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.09	12%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.03	19%	2 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	19%	18 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.07	14%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.00	23%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.04	13%	17 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.08	15%	17 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.01	20%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	15%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	16%	16 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	11%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	11%	15 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.11	0%	14 Jul →
cache	8–6	-0.08	30%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.03	19%	14 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	20%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	30%	13 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.14	11%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	16%	13 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	35%	13 Jul →
ancient	16–12	-0.09	20%	13 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.03	15%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.06	19%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	17%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	10%	31 May →
nuke	13–3	-0.00	13%	31 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.11	14%	14 May →
cache	7–13	-0.03	23%	14 May →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	24%	10 May →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	7%	10 May →
ancient	13–6	0.00	0%	8 May →
inferno	16–13	-0.06	16%	8 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	22%	30 Apr →
ancient	13–8	-0.10	15%	30 Apr →
overpass	13–5	-0.07	10%	30 Apr →
inferno	13–8	-0.10	21%	25 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.10	13%	25 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	31%	17 Apr →
inferno	15–15	-0.05	32%	17 Apr →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	14%	5 Apr →
inferno	13–4	-0.06	26%	5 Apr →
inferno	13–5	-0.03	16%	28 Mar →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	32%	28 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	11%	22 Mar →
inferno	10–13	-0.08	20%	22 Mar →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	11%	27 Feb →
ancient	13–4	-0.03	5%	22 Feb →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	21%	15 Feb →
overpass	6–13	-0.07	15%	15 Feb →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	12%	31 Jan →
overpass	13–3	-0.04	32%	25 Jan →
ancient	1–13	-0.08	23%	16 Jan →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	21%	16 Jan →
nuke	10–13	-0.09	16%	5 Jan →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	11%	5 Jan →
inferno	13–16	-0.02	22%	2 Jan →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	12%	2 Jan →
ancient	12–16	-0.01	16%	13 Dec →
overpass	13–8	-0.02	20%	13 Dec →
nuke	14–16	-0.06	17%	21 Nov →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	4%	21 Nov →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	18%	21 Nov →
dust2	7–13	-0.10	24%	10 Nov →
inferno	18–22	-0.04	17%	8 Nov →
dust2	5–13	0.00	28%	8 Nov →
inferno	6–13	-0.11	16%	3 Nov →
overpass	13–11	-0.02	24%	16 Oct →
overpass	4–13	-0.07	19%	16 Oct →
ancient	8–13	-0.10	17%	10 Oct →
ancient	13–3	-0.04	17%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	11%	10 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	24%	26 Sept →
overpass	6–13	0.00	22%	26 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	16%	19 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	11%	19 Sept →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	17%	19 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	11%	14 Sept →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	19%	14 Sept →
inferno	6–13	-0.12	8%	26 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	13%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.01	29%	15 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.06	14%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.04	9%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	23%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	29%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	41%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	12%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.00	18%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.01	30%	10 Jul →
inferno	19–17	-0.07	18%	7 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.08	18%	7 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	24%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	30%	5 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	6%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.06	25%	4 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	22%	28 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	21%	28 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	27%	28 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	24%	24 Jun →