æksjN

æksjN — CS2 Stats

NO76561197979639806[U:1:19374078]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

795Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,134 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 795 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 10 Apr 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,664 +2,907 10 Apr2 Jun · 16 days played
21,75725,456peak 25,45610 Apr2 Jun
26,054Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,134Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2025-04-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,134
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 366 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGæksjNFACEITLevel 10 · 2,134 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,134csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning57
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55432Last 10055%Win rateLWLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.7
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time585ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–4 · overpass, 29 Apr
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · anubis, 3 May
391msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 22 Apr
13–2Biggest win · train, 27 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 19mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1913668%0.05
ancientA149564%0.01
anubisB136746%0.01
infernoB105550%0.05
mirageD103730%0.01
dust2C104640%0.00
trainA85363%0.03
overpassC73443%0.08
vertigoA53260%0.09
palais220100%0.16
grail110100%-0.07
whistle110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,316Matches
52%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
87.1ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis5450%1.2317.4
Ancient4443%1.2216.1
Mirage3938%1.2117.6
Nuke3476%1.5419.6
Dust21765%1.2817.6
Inferno1567%1.3217.5
Vertigo1242%1.2916.9
Overpass1225%1.2221.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.1%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
578msReaction time
43.2%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
9.12HE damage / grenade
8.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–160.0814%26 May
nuke13–30.0724%26 May
inferno11–130.1417%26 May
nuke11–130.078%26 May
mirage7–130.0916%26 May
overpass13–160.0713%13 Jan
mirage13–110.0321%13 Jan
overpass4–130.0419%1 Oct
nuke9–130.0221%1 Oct
mirage7–130.0622%28 Aug
ancient13–40.0917%28 Aug
overpass7–130.0216%28 Aug
grail13–7-0.077%28 Aug
train13–20.114%27 Aug
dust214–160.0327%27 Aug
nuke13–80.1316%27 Aug
overpass14–160.0213%24 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0415%24 Aug
train8–130.0113%24 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0714%24 Aug
overpass16–140.0313%22 Aug
train14–160.0214%22 Aug
overpass13–40.058%22 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0311%22 Aug
nuke16–130.0117%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0319%12 Aug
ancient13–20.0710%2 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0115%2 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0413%2 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0514%9 May
dust29–130.0124%9 May
anubis13–70.0215%9 May
nuke13–90.0121%9 May
vertigo9–50.2522%4 May
nuke1–9-0.2524%4 May
inferno8–80.0120%4 May
train9–13-0.0313%4 May
inferno13–110.0324%4 May
nuke13–70.0611%4 May
nuke12–160.1020%3 May
anubis13–70.0120%3 May
dust213–30.0711%3 May
ancient13–9-0.0110%3 May
train13–50.0317%3 May
ancient9–130.0421%3 May
inferno10–30.068%3 May
anubis0–13-0.10100%3 May
mirage13–60.0220%2 May
ancient13–110.0116%2 May
nuke6–10.1840%2 May
anubis3–13-0.0617%1 May
anubis9–130.029%30 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0519%30 Apr
dust28–13-0.0229%30 Apr
ancient4–13-0.078%30 Apr
anubis11–130.0318%30 Apr
overpass9–40.3015%29 Apr
palais9–50.1210%29 Apr
vertigo3–90.0912%29 Apr
whistle9–60.0718%29 Apr
inferno9–20.1418%29 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0314%28 Apr
dust212–16-0.0317%28 Apr
anubis13–100.0416%28 Apr
nuke13–80.0219%28 Apr
dust213–7-0.0924%26 Apr
nuke5–130.0425%25 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0122%25 Apr
anubis0–13-0.0542%25 Apr
anubis13–80.1013%23 Apr
mirage13–50.0328%23 Apr
ancient16–140.0118%23 Apr
dust26–13-0.0018%23 Apr
inferno2–9-0.085%22 Apr
mirage3–50.0324%20 Apr
ancient16–130.0520%20 Apr
dust213–110.0014%20 Apr
anubis13–40.0618%20 Apr
vertigo3–9-0.1024%19 Apr
nuke9–50.1723%18 Apr
nuke13–30.1816%17 Apr
train13–40.1118%17 Apr
anubis0–13-0.0525%17 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0126%17 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0420%13 Apr
ancient6–13-0.057%13 Apr
inferno7–90.0922%13 Apr
vertigo9–10.1437%13 Apr
palais9–40.1921%13 Apr
nuke9–70.0418%12 Apr
vertigo9–30.0913%12 Apr
inferno9–70.0914%12 Apr
nuke9–30.1217%12 Apr
train16–130.0120%11 Apr
anubis16–120.1317%11 Apr
dust213–16-0.0119%11 Apr
train13–8-0.0412%11 Apr
ancient16–120.1025%11 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0414%10 Apr
dust213–80.0821%10 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →