♛ crlhnZ.

♛ crlhnZ. — CS2 Stats

76561197977696284[U:1:17430556]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,726Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,497Purple band · top ~22.4% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−384Premier CS Rating · 16,881 → 16,497

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,497 +1,497 28 May – 1 Oct · 26 days played
13,39117,254peak 17,25428 May1 Oct
17,601Peak Premier in tracked matches
878Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-05-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 878
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 23 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-25
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 757 below peak (17,254)
  • +1,123 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,582 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,503 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♛ crlhnZ.PREMIER16,497 · Purple bandPEAK ELO878csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning58
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateLWLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time583ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 27 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · inferno, 4 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 30 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 2 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 15infernoWeakest map · 37% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC3011–1937%-0.01
dust2C197–1237%-0.01
ancientC167–944%-0.00
anubisA159–660%-0.02
nukeA74–357%0.01
cacheC73–443%0.02
overpass—42–250%0.03
mirage—11–0100%0.00
vertigo—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

128Matches
49%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
81.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2065%1.2015.9
Anubis1547%1.0014.9
Mirage1233%1.3114.5
Dust21118%1.1318.8
Ancient862%1.2014.5
Nuke757%1.0114.7
Vertigo450%1.3021.5
Cache10%0.8713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
579msReaction time
51.8%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
10.34HE damage / grenade
9.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.83% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0814%1 Oct →
anubis13–100.0436%1 Oct →
dust23–13-0.1114%1 Oct →
nuke8–130.0427%30 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0522%30 Sept →
inferno13–30.0038%30 Sept →
inferno13–10.2123%27 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0614%27 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0817%23 Sept →
mirage13–100.0024%23 Sept →
ancient13–110.0119%23 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.0035%23 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0219%20 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0423%20 Sept →
ancient16–130.0229%17 Sept →
inferno13–80.0328%17 Sept →
anubis13–30.0619%17 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0024%15 Sept →
dust213–80.0316%15 Sept →
anubis13–100.0323%15 Sept →
inferno13–100.0226%15 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0328%15 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0518%15 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0418%15 Sept →
inferno13–50.0627%15 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0124%15 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0115%6 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0715%6 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0414%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0318%6 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0219%6 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0222%3 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0220%3 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0830%3 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0329%3 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0224%30 Aug →
dust213–90.0324%30 Aug →
ancient13–90.0416%30 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0520%27 Aug →
inferno15–150.0330%27 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0514%21 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0120%21 Aug →
dust213–30.0421%21 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0519%16 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0720%16 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0134%16 Aug →
nuke13–100.0224%16 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0422%16 Aug →
inferno13–50.0123%16 Aug →
cache13–110.0630%13 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0134%13 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0026%13 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0228%9 Aug →
anubis13–110.0114%9 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0128%9 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0523%9 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0510%4 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0040%4 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0120%4 Aug →
cache13–70.0318%2 Aug →
nuke13–00.1227%2 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0621%27 Jul →
cache15–150.0131%27 Jul →
nuke16–13-0.0118%26 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0318%26 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0615%26 Jul →
dust213–60.0622%26 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0222%26 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0417%26 Jul →
ancient13–60.0037%12 Jul →
anubis13–70.0823%12 Jul →
cache11–130.0120%12 Jul →
cache10–130.0421%10 Jul →
ancient13–80.0318%10 Jul →
inferno13–110.017%10 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0015%10 Jul →
inferno13–2-0.0233%10 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0316%5 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0218%5 Jul →
dust213–80.0829%5 Jul →
dust26–130.0526%4 Jul →
ancient16–120.0814%4 Jul →
inferno0–13-0.0614%2 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.0218%2 Jul →
overpass16–130.0415%2 Jul →
ancient9–130.0421%2 Jul →
overpass8–13-0.0025%21 Jun →
inferno13–8-0.0124%21 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.0422%14 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0323%10 Jun →
ancient10–130.0433%10 Jun →
inferno13–110.0724%10 Jun →
overpass16–140.0622%7 Jun →
dust28–130.0314%7 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0521%31 May →
anubis13–20.0314%31 May →
ancient8–13-0.0522%31 May →
anubis4–13-0.099%31 May →
overpass15–150.0324%28 May →
dust210–13-0.0316%28 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.