skotnes

skotnes — CS2 Stats

NO76561197976915687[U:1:16649959]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,970Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,639Purple band · top ~21.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,029 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,639 +2,329 14 Aug – 26 Sept · 21 days played
14,31016,900peak 16,90014 Aug26 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,029 +0 29 Aug – 3 Sept · 2 observations
2,0292,029peak 2,02929 Aug3 Sept
16,960Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,029Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,029
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 471 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 261 below peak (16,900)
  • +1,435 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,361 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGskotnesFACEITLevel 8 · 2,029 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER16,639 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,029csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning57
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–55–3Last 10042%Win rateLWLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.1pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility7.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.7
Utility7.2
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time600ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 26 Aug →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 25 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · inferno, 28 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 12ancientWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2410–1442%0.01
dust2C188–1044%-0.00
infernoC167–944%0.01
anubisC146–843%0.01
nukeB126–650%0.03
cacheB84–450%0.03
ancientD81–713%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,814Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
72.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10444%0.9113.6
Inferno9162%1.0715.9
Dust28243%0.8813.9
Nuke5343%0.9614.7
Ancient5048%1.0215.3
Anubis2654%1.0815.7
Overpass2560%1.0015.0
Cache1560%1.1616.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
86.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
599msReaction time
43.9%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
12.44HE damage / grenade
13.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.4821% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0317%26 Sept →
dust216–130.0016%26 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0028%26 Sept →
nuke13–40.0925%26 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0325%26 Sept →
dust216–140.0118%25 Sept →
inferno11–130.0217%25 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0417%25 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0014%23 Sept →
anubis13–40.0510%20 Sept →
dust213–10.0513%20 Sept →
mirage13–20.0129%20 Sept →
nuke13–00.1526%18 Sept →
mirage5–130.0117%18 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0425%18 Sept →
anubis9–130.0119%10 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0021%9 Sept →
inferno13–40.0933%9 Sept →
anubis3–130.0536%8 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0319%8 Sept →
nuke13–20.0414%8 Sept →
mirage13–60.0012%8 Sept →
nuke13–10.1122%7 Sept →
cache13–110.0322%7 Sept →
mirage11–130.0129%7 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0018%7 Sept →
cache11–130.0031%5 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0924%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0236%4 Sept →
inferno10–130.0422%4 Sept →
mirage13–40.0614%4 Sept →
dust27–130.0325%1 Sept →
ancient13–90.058%1 Sept →
mirage10–130.0421%1 Sept →
cache13–110.0020%1 Sept →
anubis7–130.1437%1 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0416%31 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0127%31 Aug →
inferno13–60.0127%31 Aug →
inferno13–160.0028%28 Aug →
cache13–50.0831%28 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0225%26 Aug →
dust210–130.0314%26 Aug →
anubis14–160.0416%26 Aug →
mirage13–40.1716%26 Aug →
nuke13–110.0934%24 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0029%24 Aug →
anubis13–40.0721%23 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0324%20 Aug →
mirage13–80.0429%20 Aug →
inferno11–130.0224%20 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0327%20 Aug →
anubis15–150.0015%16 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0022%16 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0730%16 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0421%16 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0222%16 Aug →
dust216–130.0324%16 Aug →
inferno22–19-0.0314%16 Aug →
ancient11–130.0213%15 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0312%15 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0023%15 Aug →
cache6–130.0119%15 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0121%15 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0522%14 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0821%14 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0311%14 Aug →
inferno13–90.0126%14 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0117%14 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0215%14 Aug →
mirage12–160.0613%14 Aug →
cache7–130.0523%10 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0521%10 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0026%6 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0226%6 Aug →
dust213–60.0924%5 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0023%5 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0414%5 Aug →
inferno10–130.0211%5 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0125%4 Aug →
cache7–20.1325%4 Aug →
anubis15–150.0218%4 Aug →
nuke11–130.0525%4 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0611%4 Aug →
dust29–130.0330%3 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0226%3 Aug →
ancient10–130.0429%3 Aug →
inferno13–110.0420%3 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.067%3 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0514%27 Jul →
inferno13–80.0616%27 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0123%27 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0226%27 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0226%27 Jul →
mirage13–20.1139%27 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0322%27 Jul →
anubis12–16-0.0220%27 Jul →
anubis19–17-0.0325%25 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0656%25 Jul →
mirage13–40.0824%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.